Skip to comments.Rush Limbaugh Show,M-F,12NOONPM-3PM,EDT,WABC AM, June 25, 2012
Posted on 06/25/2012 8:33:59 AM PDT by Biggirl
Call The Rush Limbaugh Show program line between 12 Noon and 3PM Eastern Time at: 1-800-282-2882
E-mail Rush: ElRushbo@eibnet.com
Fax Rush at: 212-445-3963
Write a letter to Rush and mail it to:
The Rush Limbaugh Show
1270 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020
Join This Ping List Now! Click Here To Join this Ping List!
Giant PING List.
Giant PING List.
Howdy! Lurking mode on.
Being able to check on immigration status should be a big win for Sherif Joe and a big FU to Eric Holder. IMHO
All the talking heads are spinning this as a win for the WH.
Janet Brewer won’t be invited to the White Hut anytime soon.
LOLing Rush: “If 0bama was pulled over in Kenya for speeding could they check his immigration status”?
survived out patient surgery......stitches were leakin blood
super sore but tired of my balls swingin Dixie at will...
Oh, my. Hope you are taking it easy.
I ‘ve had 8 kneee surgeries, 2 majors to save the leg....7 broke into ribs...4 broke arms and various stitches for whatver....
...this surgery was 100 times more pain that
I ever felt....EVER
Hope you are well medicated.
OW! I can’t even imagine any kind of pokey things going on down there.
Hope you heal soon.
Jeez..why so many surgeries??
How did it happen so I never do it?
add my surgeon is 6ft 9, hands big enuf to palm a volkswagen
well...it just happens as a hernia is hereditary..
3...one in hospital emergency settin...2 out patient
The President said at a news conference that the new program is "the right thingto do" in light of Congress's failure to pass the Administration's proposed revision of the Immigration Act. Perhaps it is, though Arizona may not think so. But to say, as the Court does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforcing applications of the Immigration Act that the President declines to enforce boggles the mind.
The Court opinion's looming specter of inutterable horror--"[i]f §3 of the Arizona statute were valid, every State could give itself independent authority to prosecute federal registration violations," seems to me not so horrible and even less looming. But there has come to pass, and is with us today, the specter that Arizona and the States that support it predicted: A Federal Government that does not want to enforce the immigration lawsas written, and leaves the States' borders unprotected against immigrants whom those laws would exclude. So the issue is a stark one. Are the sovereign States at themercy of the Federal Executive's refusal to enforce the Nation's immigration laws?
Re: Rubio. He jumped the shark yesterday on Meet The Greggy not supporting the Arizona immigration law.
SB1070 got it right on the head soup to nuts....
Doesn’t Feceral law trump State law?
no.”feceral law” says when ya gotta go,ya gotta go
Why is this guy calling in a show to tell us he is frustrated with this ruling jeopardizing his job??
He’s a Border Patrol Agent.
You said the same thing I did. Feceral law RULES over state law.
Rush gave away another Apple laptop. It’s hilarious when he does it. The caller was a Border Agent and he was refusing to take it, but sanity prevailed
I realize that. I would assume all BPAgents would be frrustrated...it’s a given. That’s why I’m confused why this guy would risk a 25 yr career just expressing what all the agents would express.
..and I guess signed by Rushbo. Totally worth it then...lol
Also, comments from live ScotusBlog:
Justice Scalia would uphold the Arizona statute in toto.
Justice Scalia began his dissent by saying that he would uphold all parts of the Arizona law.
Justice Scalia is not only dissenting from the bench, but he has produced a written copy of the bench statement for the press. It is 7 pages long.
And he read it sitting on the bench which is unusual.
Usually the Supremes write their opinion and let everyone read it for themselves.
Obama has already ordered the Feds to refuse the calls on cases from Arizona.
Yup. Scalia feels strongly about this!!! Some saying he read an angry statement, but is it a criticism from the Dums or an objective observation? Don't know.
I knew of his statement from the live ScotusBlog and that Scalia was making a copy available to the press.
What took so long for a link? It's still hard to find.
It sent a tingle up my leg when I read it. :-)
BTW: In the full court opinion, Thomas also wrote a dissenting opinion. I haven't read it yet.:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.