To: xzins; LucyT; Brown Deer; PghBaldy; In Maryland; pabianice; txrangerette; stephenjohnbanker; ...
I have been waiting for a link to Scalia’s Bench Statement on Arizona v. United States-—and it doesn’t disappoint. It deserved its own thread.
posted on 06/25/2012 11:11:39 AM PDT
” As my opinion describes in more detail, however, most of the provisions challenged here do not even impose additional penalties or consequences for violation of federal immigration laws; they merely apply stricter enforcement. The federal government would have us believe (and the Court today agrees) that even that is forbidden. “
Scalia nails it.
posted on 06/25/2012 11:19:44 AM PDT
(God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
To: thouworm; TheOldLady; WildHighlander57; netmilsmom; tomdavidd; Freeper; Gvl_M3; Flotsam_Jetsome; ...
Arizona v. United States--- Scalia's Dissenting Bench Statement
Article, and # 1.
Thank you, thouworm.
posted on 06/25/2012 11:49:44 AM PDT
See Scalia’s dissent above at article and post #1.
posted on 06/25/2012 12:44:54 PM PDT
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson