Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg

This is incorrect - on the one provision that was upheld, the vote was unanimous, which means that provision would have been upheld regardless of how the other provisions turned out. Those votes went either 5-3 or 6-2, a 4-4 decision on any of them would have simply upheld the 9th circuit’s decision on that particular provision.


10 posted on 06/25/2012 4:39:06 PM PDT by Echo4C (We have it in our power to begin the world over again. --Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Echo4C

The bottom-line, it still would not have made any difference


14 posted on 06/25/2012 4:43:03 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Echo4C
’ the one provision that was upheld, the vote was unanimous, which means that provision would have been upheld regardless of how the other provisions turned out. Those votes went either 5-3 or 6-2, a 4-4 decision on any of them would have simply upheld the 9th circuit’s decision on that particular provision.’

Good analysis.
My bet now is that Roberts folds like soggy cardboard on Obamacare.

By Friday, we will know.
TWB

g

31 posted on 06/25/2012 5:48:42 PM PDT by TWhiteBear (Sarah Palin...The Flame of the North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson