In danger. The California condor is threatened by lead poisoning from bullets in scavenged carcasses.
Credit: Joe Burnett
Posted on 06/25/2012 5:28:56 PM PDT by neverdem
Spreading its wings to a 3-meter span, flying at a speed of up to 96 kph, and living as long as 60 years, the California condor (Gymnogyps californianus) is one of the world’s most magnificent birds. It’s also one of the rarest. Only 22 condors were alive in 1982, due to poaching, habitat destruction, DDT poisoning, and shooting by cattle ranchers who mistakenly believed that the carrion-eating birds were killing young calves. An intensive captive breeding program has increased the condors’ numbers to almost 400, about half of which are free flying. But the birds still suffer from lead poisoning caused by scavenging the carcasses of animals shot with lead-based ammunition. Unless this source of lead is eliminated, the birds will never survive without human help, a new study finds.
Unlike many other carrion eaters, condors feed predominantly on the remains of large animals, which are more likely to have been shot than roadkill or small animals partially eaten by larger ones. Even small amounts of lead can affect the nervous system and kidneys of birds, mammals, and humans. In condors, high levels of lead can shut down the digestive system, causing the birds to starve.
Ironically, the success of captive breeding and releasing programs may be masking the continuing danger of lead, says research toxicologist Myra Finkelstein of the University of California, Santa Cruz. Condors’ numbers have increased because captive birds have been released into the wild; only a few chicks have been “born free.” And even after release, the birds receive massive assistance from biologists, she explains. For example, condors are caught twice a year and tested for lead; those with excessive lead levels are taken to one of several zoos, treated, and released again. “This revolving door effect keeps us from seeing whether condors can survive without human help,” she says.
To get a better handle on the impact of lead poisoning, Finkelstein and colleagues checked over 1000 blood samples taken from 150 condors between 1997 and 2010. About 70% of birds had telltale signs of lead exposure, while nearly half of free-flying condors met the standard for lead poisoning, the researchers report online today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
By checking the lead levels in the birds’ feathers, which grow over a period of several months, the researchers also got an idea of how long the condors had been exposed. Analysis of 18 feathers showed the birds had lead exposure for 75% of the feather-growing period and lead poisoning for 30% of that time.
Finkelstein and colleagues verified that bullets were indeed the source of the lead. By analyzing “isotope ratios,” a sort of mineral fingerprint made of different forms of lead, the team found that the majority of free-flying condors had ratios that matched those found in ammunition. The same technique is used to identify sources of lead poisoning in humans, Finkelstein says.
To see whether the birds could cope with lead poisoning unassisted, the researchers constructed a population model that factored in various scenarios of lead exposure. “If current management efforts go on basically forever, the condor population will remain stable,” says Finkelstein. If lead ammunition is eliminated, she says, the birds can also survive without human help. On the other hand, with no human intervention and with lead exposure as it is now, the birds will go extinct, the model predicts.
“The science is solid and the conclusions inescapable—the condor will never be a free-living species as long as exposure to lead from ammunition continues,” says raptor biologist Patrick Redig of the University of Minnesota, St. Paul, who has served on condor recovery programs but was not involved in the new study.
In 2008, California banned the use of leaded bullets in the eight counties in which condors are found. But although lead levels have since declined in other birds with smaller territories and more varied diets, such as golden eagles and turkey vultures, the condors have not yet benefited from the limited ban. Condors can fly 240 kilometers in a day (far beyond the counties in which lead is banned). Throughout their long lives they eat 75 to 100 carcasses per year, and even a single exposure to lead is potentially fatal.
Efforts to ban lead-based ammunition throughout the United States have met with stiff resistance from gun users, according to toxicologist Michael Fry, who is now with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Honolulu but previously worked on condor issues with the American Bird Conservancy in Washington, D.C. In April, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill that prevents the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating toxic components of ammunition. “Lead-free versions are available for just about every type of ammunition, and many gun users like them better,” says Fry. The bullets are more expensive, he admits. However, condor-protection programs cost an estimated $5 million per year, most of it paid for by state and federal taxes, according to the study authors. Fry notes that although lead alternatives cost just two or three cents more, a box of lead-free bullets is currently 50% higher, probably more expensive because they’re not yet in widespread use.
Finkelstein is hopeful that communication may succeed where legislation fails. Some condor-protection groups are conducting outreach programs that invite hunters to use nontoxic bullets, and Finkelstein says the hunters’ responses are encouraging.
*This item was updated to add that Michael Fry previously worked at the American Bird Conservancy in Washington, D.C, and to provide further explanation about the price of lead-free bullets.
Let me just start off by saying this sounds like a bunch of politically motivated ... Bull.
Adapt or die.
Condors don’t even look very smart.
Is it a coincidence that we have learned in ONE week that shooting caused the wildfires in the west AND that shooting kills endangered species.
If Zero is reelected, they are going to close down public lands for shooting. That will include Forest Service and BLM lands. This PR campaign is the start of that effort.
The alternative plan to ‘Fast & Furious’?
EPA back door approach to g bullet control.
Hey epa,,,,F you
Plus they'll glow in the dark so they'll be pretty at night.
It is the Condor’s job to adapt to its environment. If its environment includes things it might eat that are toxic, it should learn not to eat those things.
More agenda driven junk science to take away your bullets.
Pray for America
I say BS.
My dog could eat a piece of cheese and drop the embedded medicine pill on the floor every time.
Vultures and birds of prey rip the flesh away from the carcass. The likelihood of ingesting a bullet is about zero.
The whole issue of waterfowl ingesting lead is another bogus claim.
Probably more condors are killed by windmills than lead poisoning anyway.
I know nothing about Condors but I do know that their cousin the Turkey Buzzard DO kill baby calves. They come for the after birth and then peck the eyes out of the calves when they are only a few minutes old. I am willing to bet that Condors do the same thing.
It looks like Bull, because it is bull.
Eating lead in the form of a bullet would not be that poisonous I would not think. I wound think it would go though a condor rather quickly!!! Unless he was eating it coming out of the barrel of a rifle!!
They have to get by those windmills before they even have to worry about eating bullets!!!
I don’t see how this affects me. I don’t eat condors.
outdoor ping
Antifreeze does a number on condors too.....
Scavenging the carcases of animals shot by bullets.
Yup makes perfect sense to me! If I haul myself up to the San Gabriels and shoot a mulie, for sure I’m going to leave the carcass behind so a giant buzzard can eat the bullet.
Alzheimer's gene 'diabetes link'
Genetic Variants Build a Smarter Brain
Injected proteins protect mice from radiation poisoning
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
Condors are another of the Left’s pet species, along with whales, dolphins, spotted owls, polar bears, etc.. Frankly, I couldn’t care less if every last one of them was turned into feather dusters. Really. Would any of us notice, other than from the wailing coming from the bunny-huggers?
No coincidence at all. Looks like a coordinated media rollout.
It is sad when the survival of 400 birds is more important than the freedom of the entire country. But then, it isn’t about the birds, it’s about backdoor gun control.
In the movie “Only Angels Have Wings” , Carry Grant’s fly-buddies would throw dynamite to dislodge condors
to keep the mountain pass clear,, er it ....was a movie
, but it was fun to see big stupid birds floppin .. i guess..
probably used buzzards instead now that i think about it..
Yep, that is the clear giveaway that this is politically motivated BS.
Lead poisoning is not caused by ingesting a chunk of metalic lead. That lead passes right through you. You get lead poisoning from longterm exposure to lead in the air, water, and objects you are constantly touching. I suppose it may be different for birds since they have a gizzard. maybe chunks of lead are ground up in a gizzard. But why is it birds never had a problem going extinct until now? Obviously there is something other than lead bullets causing these birds to die off.
Now you know fully well that a Condor is not capable of such identification.
But just the same, I dispute the findings of this report. It is riddled with junk science, and is agenda driven. Namely an attack on ammunition, if not firearms. Obviously, what good is a weapon if you’ve nothing to shoot through it.
There is no empirical evidence to support their assertions. How many hunters shoot something, then leave it to rot in the sun? I shoot Bambi, and I don’t get a clean shot and he runs, I will track him for as longs as is practical to find the carcass.
Carrion my arse.
This is what scientific ignorami do with the empirical sciences, which can tell you a calculated likelihood that something is true but cannot make such qualitative statements.
How the hell would anyone know that? Just more bullshit from the people who think we should all exit the planet...except them.
FMCDH(BITS)
Birds that are shot and fall in an inaccessible area, or do not suffer enough of a shot wound to fall at once, could contribute some to the problem. Big game, very unlikely.
If Condors go extinct in the US what is the loss besides the funding that goes for their protection?
Remember, Eric Holder said “we must brainwash people against guns”, and that’s done by repeating lies and disinformation.
Planted evidence... think globull warming.
LLS
Don't forget the recent story that OSHA has started to go after gun ranges for "lead exposure".
It's saving the planet man!
“My dog could eat a piece of cheese and drop the embedded medicine pill on the floor every time.”
Ain’t that the truth! The only way we could get our dog to take his pills was to crush them up and then hide the powder inside peanut butter :)
Where have we heard something like that before?
I saw a show about this recently. They were rehabbing Condors who were hooked on lead. Treating them with some chemicals to get rid of the lead?
Common sense tells me that their numbers are BS. How many hunters are out there killing big game and not harvesting the game? The birds search the carcasses for the bullets and always find and east it? What about all the other scavengers? They never get the lead FIRST? “Heh, you Buzzard,leave that lead for the Condors”. Oh, I forgot..... Condors ARE Buzzards.
Yep, I finally arrived at peanut butter too. Even a dog that is too sick to eat will clean a dab of peanut butter off the roof of his mouth.
I call BS
I’d like to see their raw data.
The difference in years gone-by was the much greater use of shotguns for hunting game birds that were quite plentiful in the San Joaquin Valley. Many a bird didn't die from shotgun injuries, so did not get collected by hunters - condors found and ate them in great numbers, yet didn't decline in numbers until mankind occupied greater and greater amounts of landscape, turning condor hunting grounds into urban areas squeezing out near all wildlife.
There's another problem with the lead-poisoning theory - that other buzzards don't seem to suffer from the same lead poisoning elsewhere - in NM, AZ, TX, buzzard populations seem quite healthy - and plentiful. I travel to these states frequently and several times seen CA condors in AZ and NM, apparently doing quite well! There's no mistaking them - they're much larger than the average buzzard. Look for them in the mountains and valleys within mountains. And, to really push the envelope, I would bet there are more people per capita using guns on a regular basis in these states.
Last there is the fact that CA condors will come very close to the the ground and 'hover' over perceived carrion - when humans with guns are present. So close in fact, many hunters will shoot at them - thinking they are dangerous when they certainly aren't - or just 'for practice.' I witnessed such human behavior far more than once 25-30 years ago as an avid hunter, where condors were frequently seen.
I'd like to see the results of autopsies with special attention to gizzards. Metallic lead is fairly unreactive.
We are to believe hunters shoot animals and then leave them where they fall? So there is a sport where people shoot to kill for the thrill? Sounds more like the inner city.
We are to believe hunters shoot animals and then leave them where they fall? So there is a sport where people shoot to kill for the thrill? Sounds more like the inner city.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.