Posted on 06/26/2012 9:37:35 AM PDT by QT3.14
So, you have nothing to back up your accusations against Liljenquist.
I do not put my trust in lawyers.
Levin’s explanation was flimsy.
On the contrary, I have what Levin said. And, certainly in this instance, that's good enough for me. I've never known him to be one to pull such "accusations" out of thin air.
I do not put my trust in lawyers.
Wow, implying I "put my (entire) trust in lawyers." Sure, Levin happens to be a (damn good constitutional) lawyer. But, silly me, that means his opinion cannot be trusted. I can't possibly compete against such brilliant reasoning.
Levin’s explanation was flimsy.
Oh, well, your opinion is golden.
Have fun chasing your conspiracy theories. I look forward to the full exposé once you uncover the details of that relationship between Levin and Palin.
Bwahaaaahaaaaahaaa!
All you have is “What HE said”. And, HIS opinion is good enough for me, and HIS opinion can be trusted.
Hey, Mark, is that you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.