To: Perdogg; miss marmelstein
“I think I understand what Rush was referring to, if correctly quoted, and it has nothing to do with homosexuality.”
I think I know what Rush was referring to as well. It has nothing to do with blackmail, and everything to do with Court politics and coalition building.
27 posted on
06/26/2012 12:23:53 PM PDT by
AuH2ORepublican
(If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
To: AuH2ORepublican
Eloquently stated, as always.
28 posted on
06/26/2012 12:27:35 PM PDT by
Perdogg
To: AuH2ORepublican
“I think I understand what Rush was referring to, if correctly quoted, and it has nothing to do with homosexuality.”- - - - - - - -
I think I know what Rush was referring to as well. It has nothing to do with blackmail, and everything to do with Court politics and coalition building.
Arizona was a sacrifice to give political cover for sinking ObamaCare.
That is what Rush implied elsewhere.
To: AuH2ORepublican
Exactly right. Roberts needs Kennedy with him to overturn O’care; so he gave Kennedy support on Arizona (something he otherwise would not have done).
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson