Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chuck Norris blasts Obama over 'pro-gay Boy Scouts' stance
LA Times ^ | June 27, 2012 | Rene Lynch

Posted on 06/27/2012 3:27:16 PM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia

Real-life action figure Chuck Norris is blasting President Obama for allegedly working behind the scenes to create a "pro-gay Boy Scouts of America."

Norris -- an action star and well-known conservative and gun-rights activist -- made the charges in a piece posted Tuesday on Ammoland.com, a site dedicated to shooting-sports news.

Norris suggests that Americans take a closer look at the recent headlines made when James Turley, a Boy Scouts of America national board member, announced that he will work from within the scouting organization to change its long-standing position barring gay Scouts and gay Scout leaders. Turley is also chairman and chief executive of Ernst & Young.

"Is Turley working on his own initiative, or has the White House prodded him with perks and favors?" Norris asks in the article, which also suggests that Obama has tossed several political plums Turley's way so that he will carry out what he describes as the White House's pro-gay agenda. "Is it a coincidence that Turley is in tight cahoots with the White House and that he is the only BSA national board member in 100 years to oppose its pro-traditional family stance?"

The article also seems to criticize Obama for what Norris sees as the administration's favoritism of illegal immigrants, homosexuals, atheists and agnostics over Christians and U.S. taxpayers.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boyscouts; buttbusters; bwaneyfwank; chucknorris; sandusky

1 posted on 06/27/2012 3:27:20 PM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Disgusting. Ever since the fraudulent kenyan repealed DADT in the military , seems like it’s been a non stop “pride” celebration.


2 posted on 06/27/2012 3:32:51 PM PDT by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Let me just say it: Obama is gay.


3 posted on 06/27/2012 3:35:18 PM PDT by MeganC (No way in Hell am I voting for Mitt Romney. Not now, not ever. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YankeeReb

Radical gays seem to have become the Obama Left’s favorite wedge for destroying the pillars of American civilization, from marriage to the military. They’ve been hammering away at the Scouts for some time. Catholic Church too.


4 posted on 06/27/2012 3:36:22 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
Chuck Norris blasts Obama over 'pro-gay Boy Scouts' stance

Did he blast Romney too?

"I believe that all people should have the right to participate in the Boy Scouts regardless of their sexual orientation."
~Mitt Romney

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9IJUkYUbvI

5 posted on 06/27/2012 3:44:15 PM PDT by South40 ("Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance." Hussein Obama, Cairo, Egypt, June 4, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Romney is a Mormon!

(sarcasm)


6 posted on 06/27/2012 4:00:34 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Liberty and Justice for ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
Turley is also chairman and chief executive of Ernst & Young.

It's interesting how much of corporate America is now joining the "gay pride" thing

7 posted on 06/27/2012 4:03:28 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

Does Romney want homosexual Scout Masters and other leaders? It would be a good question to get him to clarify.

Maybe, a debate question?


8 posted on 06/27/2012 4:05:00 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Liberty and Justice for ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PGR88
Poster child for "Gay" Pride.

She looks so very happy.

9 posted on 06/27/2012 4:07:56 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Liberty and Justice for ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: South40

Now, I am really p*ssed off at Romney! Does he want his grandchildren in a Boy Scout Troop led by Jerry Sandusky and/or Bwanney Fwank!!!! Enough is Enough!! Start a new Organization for them, call them the Gay Boys or Boffers?
Leave the Boy Scouts alone the way they have been for all these years, a Great American CHRISTIAN ORGANIZATION!
FOR GOD AND COUNTRY!! AMEN!!


10 posted on 06/27/2012 4:20:29 PM PDT by True Republican Patriot (May GOD SAVE OUR AMERICA from ALLAH and his Prophet, HUSSEIN OBAMA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta
"I believe that all people should have the right to participate in the Boy Scouts regardless of their sexual orientation."

~Mitt Romney

Seems pretty clear to me.

11 posted on 06/27/2012 4:27:00 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

I keep asking what the difference is between Obama and Romney and have yet to get an answer. At least McCain was the lesser of two evils. Romney is just another equal evil.


12 posted on 06/27/2012 4:45:05 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: South40

At least be honest and write the entire quote...”I support the right of the Boy Scouts of America to decide what it wants to do on that issue.” Night and day difference between Romney and Obama on this issue.


13 posted on 06/27/2012 4:52:26 PM PDT by republicanbred (...and when I die I'll be republican dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
"Norris sees as the administration's favoritism of illegal immigrants, homosexuals, atheists and agnostics over Christians and U.S. taxpayers."

Add Muslims to the list.

14 posted on 06/27/2012 4:52:43 PM PDT by uncommonsense (Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC
Let me just say it: Obama is gay queer.

There ya go Megan, just a slight edit, there is nothing 'gay' about homosexuals, their mental disorder precludes them from emotional stability, let alone contentment.
15 posted on 06/27/2012 4:57:08 PM PDT by mkjessup (Finley Peter Dunne- "Politics ain't beanbag")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: republicanbred
I was honest. Romney said...

"all people should have the right to participate in the Boy Scouts regardless of their sexual orientation".

Adding the part you quoted does nothing to undermine the meaning of the quote above.

16 posted on 06/27/2012 5:02:02 PM PDT by South40 ("Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance." Hussein Obama, Cairo, Egypt, June 4, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Let me just say it: Chuck Norris is still alive.


17 posted on 06/27/2012 5:03:54 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Let me remind you that if Chuck Norris is late time better slow the %$#% down.


18 posted on 06/27/2012 5:07:06 PM PDT by VaRepublican (I would propagate taglines but I don't know how. But bloggers do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: republicanbred

Romney is for gay marriage and gay adoption http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2882371/posts

and forced schools to indoctrinate children in the gay “lifestyle” over parents objections.

 As governor, to please Massachusetts’ militant homosexual groups, Romney aggressively BOOSTED government funding for pro-homosexuality indoctrination, starting in kindergarten. He refused to defend schoolchildren and parents’ rights against this indoctrination. He refused to order his education officials to obey the law guaranteeing that parents’ can protect their children from sexual brainwashing. Romney would not let parents opt out their children. Romney is a pervert.


19 posted on 06/27/2012 5:07:29 PM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: True Republican Patriot

Rump Rangers of troop 69


20 posted on 06/27/2012 5:10:54 PM PDT by Craftmore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances
Good post Linda.

I can't imagine why any conservative would try to defend Romney's pro-gay past. If he didn't think gays should be in the Boy Scouts he should never have said he did. But he did because he does.

Thanks for the post.

21 posted on 06/27/2012 5:31:56 PM PDT by South40 ("Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance." Hussein Obama, Cairo, Egypt, June 4, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances
Good post Linda.

I can't imagine why any conservative would try to defend Romney's pro-gay past. If he didn't think gays should be in the Boy Scouts he should never have said he did. But he did because he does.

Thanks for the post.

22 posted on 06/27/2012 5:32:07 PM PDT by South40 ("Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance." Hussein Obama, Cairo, Egypt, June 4, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Doesn’t a boy have to be abstinent (though not necessarily a virgin) to be awarded the Eagle Scout? How can they expect any less from their leaders?


23 posted on 06/27/2012 5:54:14 PM PDT by Burkean (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Turley should be immediately kicked off the board of the scouts.


24 posted on 06/27/2012 6:07:59 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw; True Republican Patriot; ilovesarah2012
Participate and lead are two very different things. If someone isn't openly gay, how do you know they are? I doubt anyone wants a questionnaire for 13, 14 and 15 year old boys to determine whether they think they are gay or not. (Well, flaming homosexuals do because they want to capitalize on a confusing time of adolescence to trick otherwise normal kids into their perverted lifestyle.)

There IS a world of difference between Mitt Romney and Barack (gay pride at the White House) Obama. If anyone can't see that, then I feel really very sorry for you.

My overall contention is that even though I would prefer a much more conservative candidate than Mittens, I believe he loves our country and the basic order of law. He will not run roughshod over congress like Obama has. Do you really prefer Obama over Romney?

25 posted on 06/27/2012 6:16:20 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Liberty and Justice for ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

I did not even comment on Romney’s statement except to say it seems clear.
And you apparently seemed to want it to turn in a defense of Romney’s pro homosexual political history, check that an excuse for it.
Romney has said he supports homosexual adoption, he lead the way in MA for homosexual ‘marriage’ before you say “no he didn’t”, the massive amount of evidence and times lines have been posted on FR before supporting this, I am not going to do it again.
Romney is not now or has he ever been a conservative.


26 posted on 06/27/2012 6:40:28 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: svcw; FreeAtlanta
Romney has said he supports homosexual adoption, he lead the way in MA for homosexual ‘marriage’ before you say “no he didn’t”, the massive amount of evidence and times lines have been posted on FR before supporting this, I am not going to do it again.

Romney is not now or has he ever been a conservative.


Here you go SVCW:

Joint Letter to Governor Mitt Romney from Pro-Family Leaders
(This letter was hand-delivered to the Governor’s staff on Dec. 20, 2006.)


December 20, 2006

The Honorable W. Mitt Romney Governor, Commonwealth of Massachusetts The State House Boston, MA 02133

Dear Governor Romney:

You have a few weeks left in your term to take action on the issue of marriage. Contrary to opinions offered up by liberal commentators, liberal legal authorities, and perhaps even your own staff, you have the authority as Governor to reverse the damage that has been done to the sacred institution of marriage. The signatories below urge you to declare immediately that homosexual “marriage” licenses issued in violation of the law are illegal and to issue an order to all state and local officials to cease violating the law.

As is increasingly well known, the Massachusetts Constitution denies the Judicial Branch any role in marriage policy:
"All causes of marriage...shall be heard and determined by the governor and council, until the legislature shall, by law, make other provision." (PART THE SECOND, Ch. III, Article V.)
In hearing the Goodridge case and issuing an opinion, four of the seven judges violated the Supreme Law of Massachusetts. Massachusetts courts have admitted, on other occasions, that neither they nor legislators, nor the governor are authorized to violate the Constitution:
g[The words of the Constitution] are mandatory and not simply directory. They are highly important. There must be compliance with them.h (Town of Mount Washington v. Cook 288 Mass. 67)
Nevertheless, after these judges issued an illegal opinion, you told the citizens of Massachusetts and all of America that you had no choice but to "execute the law." Oddly, you were not referring to a law, but to the judgesf opinion.

Your oath to uphold the Constitution requires treating an unconstitutional opinion as void (as President Thomas Jefferson did in Marbury v. Madison). You failed to do this. Nor did you treat it as an illegal ruling that affected only the specific plaintiffs (as Abraham Lincoln did, refusing to accept the Dred Scott ruling as law, pointing out that judges do not make law).

Instead, you asserted that the courtfs opinion was a glaw" and thus binding. Though the Legislature never revoked the actual law, you issued . with no legal authority -- the first ghomosexual marriageh licenses in American history.

The Massachusetts Constitution does not confirm either your statements or your actions:
"[T]he people of this commonwealth are not controllable by any other laws than those to which their constitutional representative body have given their consent." (PART THE FIRST, Article X.)
The Constitution also disproves your assertion to the nation that the marriage statute (M.G.L. Chapter 207) was somehow suspended or nullified by the four judges:
"The power of suspending the laws, or the execution of the laws, ought never to be exercised but by the legislature, or by authority derived from it, to be exercised in such particular cases only as the legislature shall expressly provide for." (PART THE FIRST, Article XX.)
In light of both your actions and your explanations, it comes as a great surprise to many of us to learn that, under the Massachusetts Constitution, judges cannot suspend or alter statutes. This principle is clearly fundamental to Massachusetts' system of government and is restated in multiple ways.
"The judicial shall never exercise the legislative and executive powers, or either of them: to the end it may be a government of laws and not of men." (PART THE FIRST, Article XXX.)
We note that the Massachusetts Constitution so completely protects citizens from the rule of judges that even laws passed in the Colonial period before the Constitution itself was ratified cannot be suspended by judges:
"All the laws which have heretofore been adopted, used and approved c shall still remain and be in full force, until altered or repealed by the legislaturec" (PART THE SECOND, Article VI.)
We note, Governor, that in all of your justifications to the nation, there was no mention of these parts of the Constitution which you swore to defend. Why? Even this same court is forced to admit:
"The Constitution as framed is the only guide. To change its terms is within the power of the people alone." (Opinion of the Justices, 220 Mass. 613, 618)
We note Massachusetts Chief Justice Hutchison's words in 1767: "laws should be established, else Judges and Juries must go according to their Reason, that is, their Will" and "[T]he Judge should never be the Legislator: Because, then the Will of the Judge would be the Law: and this tends to a State of Slavery.' " As Judge Swift put it in 1795, courts "ought never to be allowed to depart from the well known boundaries of express law, into the wide fields of discretion."

As for your claims about the authority of Goodridge and its illegal 180-day instruction to the Legislature, the same court had admitted in 1992 that they cannot issue an order to the legislature or the governor:
"The courts [instructing] when and how to perform...constitutional duties" (mandamus) "is not available against the Legislature [or] against the Governor)."

"The...principles expressed in...the Massachusetts Constitution...call for the judiciary to refrain from intruding into the power and function of another branch of government." (LIMITS v. President of the Senate, 414 Mass. 31, 31 n.3, 35 (1992)
We also note this ruling in 1969: "an unconstitutional overreaching by the judiciary is an act that is gnot only not warranted but, indeed, [is] precluded.h (Commonwealth v. Leis)

We note that even the Goodridge majority said they were not suspending the marriage statute:
gHere, no one argues that striking down the marriage laws is an appropriate form of relief."
In fact, they admitted that under the statute, Chapter 207 of the Massachusetts General Laws, homosexual marriage is illegal: gWe conclude, as did the judge, that M.G.L. c. 207 may not be construed to permit same-sex couples to marry.h

Moreover, we note that nothing in the Goodridge ruling asked or pretended to authorize the governor to violate the statute in the event that the Legislature would not repeal it.

We also note that the statute remains in the Massachusetts General Laws, and has never been stricken, suspended or nullified. The court itself has previously clarified your obligation:
"But the statute, so long as it stands, imposes upon both branches [of the Legislature] uniformity of procedure so far as concerns this particular matter. One branch cannot ignore it without a repeal of the statute. A repeal can be accomplished only by affirmative vote of both branches and approval by the governor." (Dinan v. Swig, 223 Mass. 516, 519 (1916)
Nevertheless, with no legislation authorizing you to do so, you ordered the Department of Public Health to change the words on marriage licenses from "husband" and "wife," to "Partner A" and "Partner B." Stunningly, you later admitted that without enabling legislation you cannot change birth certificates in a similar way.

We note that, despite the court's admission that the statute prohibits ghomosexual marriage,h and the Constitution's statement that only the Legislature can suspend laws, you ordered officials to perform homosexual marriages and thus violate the statute (a crime under c. 207 ˜48), and the oath of office by. Those who refused, you ordered to resign.

This emboldened other local officials, including the mayor of Boston, to boast publicly that they would break the law by "marrying" out-of-state homosexual couples . also a crime under c. 207 ˜48.

In summary, while the four judges asserted that Chapter 207 is unconstitutional, they did not suspend the marriage statute and were powerless to do so. The legislature has not changed or repealed it. Therefore:

1. The marriage statute is still in effect.
2. The statute continues to prohibit same-sex marriages.

We note that you swore no oath to execute court opinions, but rather laws and the Constitution. The same Massachusetts high court itself said in 1986: [The Executive branch] must "be faithful to the words of the statute ... as written, and an event or contingency for which no provision has been made does not justify judicial [or Executive Branch] legislation." (Amherst v. Attorney General, 398 Mass. 793)

You swore an oath to uphold the Constitution against assault from the other two branches. You swore on a Holy Bible, and said, "So help me, God." Your oath itself declares that it is violated on penalty of perjury, a felony.

Like much of America, many of us accepted as sincere your explanations of your role in this social and constitutional crisis that is fundamentally altering the moral fabric of our culture and eroding basic building block of human society. We are now forced to look at your role, as constitutional sentry and a gatekeeper of our form of government, in a different light.

We would be greatly disappointed if your principal contribution to history will be imposing homosexual marriage -- knowingly or unknowingly, willfully or negligently -- in violation of the state Constitution you swore to uphold.

. We urge you in the strongest possible way to fulfill the obligation imposed by the Constitution of Massachusetts upon the "Supreme Executive Magistrate" to uphold Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 207 the marriage statute, by declaring immediately in a formal, written executive order that the Goodridge court cannot overrule the Constitution and that homosexual marriage therefore remains against the law.

. We urge you also to issue immediately a public memorandum from the Office of the Governor declaring members of the Legislature to be engaged in a conspiracy against the Constitution, to which the oath of office attaches the penalties of perjury -- a felony.

. We urge you to immediately notify the legislators who openly conspired against the Constitution in denying the first marriage amendment petition a vote in 2002 that:

. they violated the oath of office, a constitutional felony, and

. as a citizensf constitutional petition, that initiative remains pending until brought to one of the five final actions the Constitution requires and

. therefore their crime against the Constitution is perpetual and without statute of limitations

. unless they vote, you will call them into session on that original marriage petition and

. will order the state police to arrest them and bring them to the chambers to vote (as the Governor of Texas ordered in May 2003 when Texas legislators refused to convene a quorum).


Under conditions of repeated and systematic constitutional abuse, these steps by a governor are the minimum required to defend constitutional democracy and our republican form of government.

Signed,
Paul Weyrich, Free Congress Foundation
*Sandy Rios, Culture Campaign
*Gary Kreep, Esq., president, United States Justice Foundation ++
*Robert Knight, a draftsman of the federal Defense of Marriage Ac
t Linda Harvey, Mission America
Rev. Ted Pike, National Prayer Network
Randy Thomasson, Campaign for Children and Families
Peter LaBarbera, Americans for Truth
Dr. Chuck Baldwin, radio host, columnist
Paul Likoudis, The Wanderer
Rev. Stephen Bennett, Stephen Bennett Ministries
Phil Lawler, Catholic World News
Rev. Scott Lively, Esq., Defend the Family
*Dr. William Greene, RightMarch.com
Michael Heath, Christian Civic League of Maine
David E. Smith, Illinois Family Institute
Gary Glenn, American Family Association of Michigan
Diane Gramley, American Family Association of Pennsylvania
Micah Clark, American Family Association of Indiana
Kevin McCoy, West Virginia Family Foundation
Stephen Cable, Vermont Center for American Cultural Renewal
Joe Glover, Family Policy Network (National)
Terry Moffitt, Family Policy Network of North Carolina
Marnie Deaton, Family Policy Network of Virginia
Danny Eason, Family Policy Network of Texas
Matt Chancey, Family Policy Network of Alabama
Ron Shank, Family Policy Network of Tennessee
*John R. Diggs, Jr., M.D., leading expert on the medical risks of homosexuality
Sonja Dalton, Real Civil Rights Illinois
Allyson Smith, Americans for Truth/California
Brian Camenker, MassResistance
Bunny S. Galladora, Woman's Christian Temperance Union
Dr. Paul Cameron, Family Research Institute
James Hartline, The Hartline Report
Jan Markell, Olive Tree Ministries & Radio
Bill Cotter, Operation Rescue Boston
R. T. Neary, ProLife Massachusetts
Mike O'Neil, CPF/The Fatherhood Coalition, Massachusetts
John F. Russo, Marriage & Family, Massachusetts
*Stacy Harp, Active Christian Media, host, The Right View
Rena Havens, Mothers Against Pedophilia
John Haskins, Parentsf Rights Coalition
Rev. Michael Carl, Constitution Party of Massachusetts
Carl Parnell, author, From Schoolhouse to Courthouse

Affiliations are listed for identification purposes only and do not imply a formal endorsement or commitment by those organizations.

*Signed after December 20, 2006.
++Notes he has not had an opportunity to investigate punishable criminal consequences of violating the Massachusetts oath of office.

Massachusetts in-state contact: John Haskins, 781-890-6001
27 posted on 06/27/2012 8:27:03 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: South40

The spiral (downward) to liberalism, leftism, fascism, Marxism, total despotism, continues from presidential election to the next, regardless of the candidates’ party.


28 posted on 06/27/2012 8:30:37 PM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Thanks.

Yet those who support Romney will ignore or make excuses for him.


29 posted on 06/27/2012 8:45:18 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

I hate Obama. Why would you think I prefer him? I just wish I was able to vote for a conservative. Romney ain’t it!


30 posted on 06/28/2012 4:47:22 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

PLEASE! All I said was that this P*ssed me off about Romney!
That in NO WAY implied or stated that I preferred the Obamanation, the Gay Muslim Terrorist and Grand Liar and America Hater over MITT!! I LOVE MITT! He is a super Businessman and Leader who I believe will make a Great President under Our Conservative Guidance and Nudgings!
There is no question that the Romneys Love Our America and Our Freedoms as they existed before the Obamanation and his Band of Criminals stole the White House in 2008! Obama was ineligible then, and he still is now! Putin even said that he would be an Illegal President before the Election....:-)


31 posted on 06/28/2012 11:16:28 AM PDT by True Republican Patriot (May GOD SAVE OUR AMERICA from ALLAH and his Prophet, HUSSEIN OBAMA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson