Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Smokeyblue

You may be right on! (sorry for that pun, I’m from the 60’s)

Now on the other hand, what if he is?

I don’t know the man, as a pig farmer I’ve never had the chance to interact with any of the high falootin upper crusties.

But just what if?

Our country is in trouble. I have faith that God will sort things out.


26 posted on 06/28/2012 5:10:33 PM PDT by ConradofMontferrat (According to mudslimze, my handle is a Hate Crime. Hope they don't like it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: ConradofMontferrat; NTHockey

“Now on the other hand, what if he is?”

It’s pointless to play that game. You say yourself that you are grasping for a ray of hope.

Reposting NTHockey’s post here:

Occam’s razor:”other things being equal, a simpler explanation is better than a more complex one.”

The Roberts decision is so complex as to defy reason. One principle of law is what would a reasonable man expect? There is no such standard in this decision. Rather, there is a twisted, convoluted Machiavellian path from A to B that no reasonable person would accept. If something is repeatedly deemed not a tax, by what stretch of the imagination is it suddenly a tax?


29 posted on 06/28/2012 5:19:01 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson