You may be right on! (sorry for that pun, I’m from the 60’s)
Now on the other hand, what if he is?
I don’t know the man, as a pig farmer I’ve never had the chance to interact with any of the high falootin upper crusties.
But just what if?
Our country is in trouble. I have faith that God will sort things out.
“Now on the other hand, what if he is?”
It’s pointless to play that game. You say yourself that you are grasping for a ray of hope.
Reposting NTHockey’s post here:
Occams razor:other things being equal, a simpler explanation is better than a more complex one.
The Roberts decision is so complex as to defy reason. One principle of law is what would a reasonable man expect? There is no such standard in this decision. Rather, there is a twisted, convoluted Machiavellian path from A to B that no reasonable person would accept. If something is repeatedly deemed not a tax, by what stretch of the imagination is it suddenly a tax?