Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter Saw This Coming - Coulter predicted conservative outrage at Roberts a full seven
Buzz Feed ^ | 6/28/12 | Rosie Gray, BuzzFeed Staff

Posted on 06/28/2012 9:19:39 PM PDT by Nachum

Ann Coulter prophesied the coming split between Chief Justice Roberts and conservatives back in 2005, writing that "Stealth nominees have never turned out to be a pleasant surprise for conservatives."

After pretending to consider various women and minorities for the Supreme Court these past few weeks, President Bush decided to disappoint all the groups he had just ginned up and nominate a white male.

So all we know about him for sure is that he can't dance and he probably doesn't know who Jay-Z is. Other than that, he is a blank slate. Tabula rasa. Big zippo. Nada. Oh, yeah ... We also know he's argued cases before the Supreme Court. Big deal; so has Larry Flynt's attorney.

But unfortunately, other than that that, we don't know much about John Roberts. Stealth nominees have never turned out to be a pleasant surprise for conservatives. Never. Not ever.

Since the announcement, court-watchers have been like the old Kremlinologists from Soviet days looking for clues as to what kind of justice Roberts will be.

(Excerpt) Read more at buzzfeed.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: coulter; roberts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Full title: Ann Coulter Saw This Coming -

Coulter predicted conservative outrage at Roberts a full seven years ago.

1 posted on 06/28/2012 9:19:47 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I blame most GOP senators for always leaving their balls in the primaries. Once they get to DC they become eunuchs. If they had balls, they would always go full tilt for conservative judges and beat the hell out of any rat that goes after them.


2 posted on 06/28/2012 9:23:28 PM PDT by ABQHispConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

That’s nice. Nowadays Coulter is talking from the other side of the fence though.


3 posted on 06/28/2012 9:23:56 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

And Drudge is now talking about Roberts’ epilepsy...


4 posted on 06/28/2012 9:24:41 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Dennis Prager was talking about this on his show today. Anyone have Coulter’s full article?


5 posted on 06/28/2012 9:25:05 PM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2005-07-20.html


6 posted on 06/28/2012 9:33:17 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Ann is sharp as a whip, but has been blinded of late by the Beltway...

Prescience is a gift- as is Liberty.

Do the right thing, dear.


7 posted on 06/28/2012 9:35:15 PM PDT by One Name (Go to the enemy's home court and smoke his ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

That was fast. Thanks.


8 posted on 06/28/2012 9:39:15 PM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The warning signs were all there, and most of us, including me, chose to ignore them.....NEVER AGAIN!


9 posted on 06/28/2012 9:40:26 PM PDT by dfwgator (FUJR (not you, Jim))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Faith Hope and John Roberts (conservatives are accepting Roberts on a "leap of faith")

John Roberts: A Supreme Property Rights Disaster In The Making

10 posted on 06/28/2012 9:40:43 PM PDT by ImpeachRoberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Here's a question: There were undercurrents that Roberts might be gay during his confirmation hearings. There were pictures of Roberts with other male friends showing off a pizza that they had cooked, etc. There are now rumors that he may have been 'nudged'into changing his opinion. The dissent was written as a majority opinion, the opinion even referring to Ginsburg as writing the ‘dissent’. Is it possible that Roberts has been ‘nudged’
into changing his vote to keep some skeletons in the closet? I have no evidence but there have been rumblings in the past.
11 posted on 06/28/2012 9:43:08 PM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Soon we will see Harriet Miers billboards that say, “Miss me yet?”


12 posted on 06/28/2012 9:49:02 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye
The dissent was written as a majority opinion, the opinion even referring to Ginsburg as writing the ‘dissent’.

That Wascally Justice Scalia was giving us a clue that something went South by not doing an edit?
13 posted on 06/28/2012 9:55:48 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Didn’t you get the memo....Ann is a RINO around here. /sarcasm.


14 posted on 06/28/2012 9:56:06 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
From the article:

If the Senate were in Democrat hands, Roberts would be perfect. But why on earth would Bush waste a nomination on a person who is a complete blank slate when we have a majority in the Senate!

We also have a majority in the House, state legislatures, state governorships, and have won five of the last seven presidential elections seven of the last 10!

We're the Harlem Globetrotters now why do we have to play the Washington Generals every week?

Conservatism is sweeping the nation, we have a fully functioning alternative media, we're ticked off and ready to avenge Robert Bork ... and Bush nominates a Rorschach blot.

Me talking:

Bushie, Rove, and others squandered all that and we got Pelousy and Harry Grim Reaper in 2006 and the foreign, America hating being that inhabits the Whitehouse.

In full disclosure, I used to think Roberts was one of the good things Bushie did. I guess I didn't read this article at the time not that that matters.

15 posted on 06/28/2012 9:59:15 PM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Gerald Ford gave us John Paul liberal.

Ronald Reagan gave us SCALIA and two wishy-washy swing voters (Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony Kennedy).

The first Bush gave us THOMAS and also David Souter (to cancel out Thomas on all the important votes).

The second Bush gave us ALITO and wishy-washy dud John Roberts after trying to give us Harriet from down the hall at the White House.

Romney should start vetting judicial candidates right now. No blank slates. No surprises. Start with Ann Coulter.


16 posted on 06/28/2012 10:05:48 PM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pallis

Alito was nominated after Miers withdrew.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/31/AR2005103100180.html


17 posted on 06/28/2012 10:07:19 PM PDT by MEG33 (O Lord, Guide Our Nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

More Grist for the “John Roberts Is Gay” Mill (2005)

http://underneaththeirrobes.blogs.com/main/2005/08/more_grist_for_.html

Supreme Court Nominee John Roberts: Gay Rights Champion? (2005)

http://blogcritics.org/politics/article/supreme-court-nominee-john-roberts-gay/

Justice Roberts and Gay Marriage (2010)

http://www.houstongalvestonlawyer.com/blog/2010/05/justice-roberts-and-gay-marriage.shtml

Is Justice Roberts gay? (picture)

http://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/p/18856059/Is-Justice-Roberts-gay.aspx


18 posted on 06/28/2012 10:08:13 PM PDT by Nachum (http://www.houstongalvestonlawyer.com/blog/2010/05/justThe complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: billclintonwillrotinhell

Harriet Meiers would have been a better bet.


19 posted on 06/28/2012 10:23:11 PM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Question coming to mind: Is there precedent for SCOTUS retiring/replacing during presidential lame-duck timeframes?


20 posted on 06/28/2012 10:28:16 PM PDT by C210N ("ask not what the candidate can do for you, ask what you can do for the candidate" (Breitbart, 2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson