Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter Saw This Coming - Coulter predicted conservative outrage at Roberts a full seven
Buzz Feed ^ | 6/28/12 | Rosie Gray, BuzzFeed Staff

Posted on 06/28/2012 9:19:39 PM PDT by Nachum

Ann Coulter prophesied the coming split between Chief Justice Roberts and conservatives back in 2005, writing that "Stealth nominees have never turned out to be a pleasant surprise for conservatives."

After pretending to consider various women and minorities for the Supreme Court these past few weeks, President Bush decided to disappoint all the groups he had just ginned up and nominate a white male.

So all we know about him for sure is that he can't dance and he probably doesn't know who Jay-Z is. Other than that, he is a blank slate. Tabula rasa. Big zippo. Nada. Oh, yeah ... We also know he's argued cases before the Supreme Court. Big deal; so has Larry Flynt's attorney.

But unfortunately, other than that that, we don't know much about John Roberts. Stealth nominees have never turned out to be a pleasant surprise for conservatives. Never. Not ever.

Since the announcement, court-watchers have been like the old Kremlinologists from Soviet days looking for clues as to what kind of justice Roberts will be.

(Excerpt) Read more at buzzfeed.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: coulter; roberts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: pallis

Harriet Miers was replaced by Alito.


21 posted on 06/28/2012 10:30:53 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

“But why on earth would Bush waste a nomination on a person who is a complete blank slate when we have a majority in the Senate!”

Remember, at that time, the Democrat minority in the Senate was interminably stalling all judicial nominees in committee, or by preventing cloture. We could have used the “nuclear option” to override that, and gotten our nominees through, but the moderates in the Senate formed the “Gang of 14” to prevent that, and instead set themselves up as the brokers of all judicial nominees. After that, Bush’s nominees had to get past the Gang of 14’s nebulous “extraordinary circumstances” clause, in order to prevent the previous standoff from returning.

That’s the reason we “wasted a nomination” trying to put someone in the court who did not seem too partisan. For this, we can thank the “Republicans”:

Lincoln Chafee (R-RI)
Susan Collins (R-ME)
Mike DeWine (R-OH)
Lindsey Graham (R-SC)
John McCain (R-AZ)
Olympia Snowe (R-ME)
John Warner (R-VA)


22 posted on 06/28/2012 10:40:08 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pallis

Why?


23 posted on 06/28/2012 10:55:48 PM PDT by free me (Roberts killed America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Ah yes, forgot about that.


24 posted on 06/28/2012 10:58:22 PM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
"Bushie, Rove, and others squandered all that and we got Pelousy and Harry Grim Reaper in 2006 and the foreign, America hating being that inhabits the Whitehouse. "

I agree completely with that- but I've always wondered-Who was the idiot, Bush or Rove? I know that Bush was ultimately responsible for those disastrous second term decisions, but where did they originate?

25 posted on 06/28/2012 11:17:05 PM PDT by matthew fuller (Hussein Obama Dada is absolutely the most offensive President that the US has ever suffered.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pallis

“Harriet Miers billboards”

WWHD (What would Harriet Do)?


26 posted on 06/29/2012 1:14:09 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... yet voting doesn't???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
After hearing the decision yesterday, I once again thought of SC picks. Why is it that when a Repub President nominates and gets someone on the bench, half the time the person ends up a wishy-washy moderate that goes left. But when a a Dem President gets one of their own on the bench, that person stays left - never going right on any decision?

And while I am at it, let me rant a little bit. I live in Maryland so for decades my vote has never mattered - for President, Senate, House. Yet I thought yesterday that even if we had the reincarnation of Ronald Reagan, and he was able to win Maryland. And by a miracle of God we got Repub Senators voted in from Maryland, and replaced the leftists with conservatives, it does not matter. One guy in a black robe nullifies all of that. And it seems to be like professional wrestling - all planned and choreographed with just one person swinging the other way to prevent the pendulum swinging back to the Constitution.

What difference does it make?

27 posted on 06/29/2012 4:15:34 AM PDT by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

It’s a joke. You know a joke, but what the hell...?


28 posted on 06/29/2012 7:30:48 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pallis

“It’s a joke. You know a joke, but what the hell...?”

Mine wasn’t. Well.. maybe just a little..


29 posted on 06/29/2012 7:45:20 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... yet voting doesn't???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

It’s ironic that Coulter now strongly supports the liberal socialist Mittens, the architect of Obamacare, for president.
That alone calls into question the credibility of her entire archive.


30 posted on 06/29/2012 9:45:58 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Damn...she was precient

I remember when he was nominated. I like him but didn't have much info. I read one of her columns and wondered aloud....

31 posted on 07/01/2012 10:25:22 AM PDT by YoungBlackRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YoungBlackRepublican

“Damn...she was precient”

True. Why is she so in the tank for Romney?


32 posted on 07/01/2012 10:26:50 AM PDT by Nachum (http://www.houstongalvestonlawyer.com/blog/2010/05/justThe complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“True. Why is she so in the tank for Romney?”

That’s been my question. I just can’t understand it.
And she’s been in the tank for him for quite a while now.


33 posted on 07/02/2012 10:33:18 AM PDT by YoungBlackRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson