Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Bill Gates Or You Can Spark the Next Industrial and Agricultural Revolution
Amazon ^ | June 2012 | Charles Kilmer

Posted on 06/29/2012 1:07:11 PM PDT by ckilmer

The most revolutionary innovation needed in the next 10 years is the thorium portable nuclear reactor. Why? Because Bill Gates says repeatedly that the most important thing we need is a non polluting source of energy that’s 1/4 the cost of the coal energy. Why? Cheaper energy will lead to the next industrial and agricultural revolution. Everyone from the very poorest to the very richest will benefit. Government coffers will be refilled. Mr Gates believes nuclear energy will do this.

Which nuclear design?

Thorium fits the bill. Especially the liquid fluoride thorium reactor designs. Why?

Besides producing electricity for ¼ the cost of coal - the man who first held the patents for the design of today’s most widely used light water reactors-Alvin Weinberg (who headed the Oak Ridge Laboratories during the 1960s to 1970s), tested light water reactors side-by-side against the liquid fluoride thorium reactors and found the LFTR’s to be both much safer and much less expensive.

Scientists in the USA and China have said that a prototype can be built for 1 billion dollars in five years. The Pentagon already has a program in place to buy prototypes—thereby creating a path across the Valley of Death.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: billgates; desalination; revolution; solicitation; thorium
The complete ebook is available for free today http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0089Z7V6Y
1 posted on 06/29/2012 1:07:23 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Those granola sucking Green Weenies will make sure this never happens.


2 posted on 06/29/2012 1:16:32 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Not necessarily. Bill gates says that wind and solar power will never be the main base load generators of electricity. he says rather that nuclear power plants will do that job.


3 posted on 06/29/2012 3:26:27 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Here's a clickable link to the Amazon site. http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0089Z7V6Yz
4 posted on 06/29/2012 3:28:11 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Here's a clickable link to the Amazon site. http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0089Z7V6Yz
5 posted on 06/29/2012 3:28:30 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

This sensible move will be opposed based on anti nuclear hysteria, not just because of solar or windmills.


6 posted on 06/29/2012 3:35:54 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

I agree that there is a lot of opposition to nuclear. but the obama administration is already moving ahead on uranium reactors.

If the pubbies get in come november, they’ll likely open the door wider.


7 posted on 06/29/2012 3:58:40 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson