Posted on 06/30/2012 7:43:07 AM PDT by circumbendibus
WASHINGTON, June 29, 2012 – A third hearing in a lawsuit challenging President Obama’s eligibility to appear on the Florida ballot is being held this morning, Friday June 29 in Tallahassee. The hearing comes on the last day of a critical week for the Obama Administration, which included yesterday's Supreme Court health care ruling and a vote by the U.S. House of Representatives to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in Contempt of Congress.
President Obama through his attorneys filed a motion to strike the amended complaint, and the plaintiff, a Florida voter represented by Attorney Larry Klayman, has filed an opposition to the motion to strike.
Judge Terry Lewis, noted for presiding over the 2000 Florida election results dispute between George W. Bush and Al Gore, is assigned to the case in Leon County Circuit Court.
(Excerpt) Read more at communities.washingtontimes.com ...
PING!
Florida law makes it easier for a voter to challenge candidate eligibility, so the usual nonsense of “no legal standing” will not fly here....unless the judge has been instructed to fix the case
Sad is that not only the liberal MSM will not cover it....but we have a lot of so-called “conservatives” who act as liberal as the MSM when it comes to Obama Eligibility. I swear you think a lot of the so-called “conservatives” are helping Obama win re-election
Larry Klayman doesn’t have the best track record.
A whole bunch of so-called conservatives just want everyone to shut up so Rubio can be nominated.
“Florida law makes it easier for a voter to challenge candidate eligibility, so the usual nonsense of “no legal standing” will not fly here”
Man, it would be great if even only 1 state declared him not fit to run. Of course, with his October surprise of a newly doctored set of papers, he would declare a constitutional crisis and void election, making himself king.
Um.... so like this was supposedly done yesterday?? Is there a follow-up or do I have to look for myself?
So the BIG question is what happened yesterday. I suppose I’ll have to go to Klayman’s site to see. Be right back kiddies!
Cool - thanks: much appreciated. Was thinking that the Judge might rule on the motion to dismiss yesterday.
Nothing on either of Klayman’s sites. I would have thought a dismissal would have made news.
You have to remember that if the not-eligible suit is successful, we may get Hillary as the Dem nominee. Many Republicans may not like that if they consider O is easier to beat.
Doesn’t matter at all.
If it goes to the Supreme Court, guess what...
States control voting, just ask Holder who tried to intimidate Scott from cleaning the rolls of ineligible voters.
While I agree on Hillary, I also don’t believe that’s the point: we’ve got a guy who has been going far out of his way to duck the eligibility question... I wanna know the answers and I want the law upheld.
All Holder needs to do is find a judge who agrees with him, then it’s over.
There is no recourse anymore, there is no justice anymore.
I believe the judge who decides is Roy Lamberth. He is no friend of this administration.
Someday, someone is going to force him to prove he was eligible to sign this law.
Monckton tells Lords: Obama presidency at risk
From the report:
Attorneys for anyone accused of a criminal offence signed into statute by President Obama under Art. I, s. 7, have the right to request access by their forensic investigators to the Hawaii Health Department’s original birth record for Mr. Obama to satisfy them that the President is the President, the statute the statute and the alleged offence an offence. he suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process [14th Amdt.] where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment”. Therefore, the courts will be obliged to grant any such defence request. By the supremacy clause (Art. 6), Hawaii must comply.
By the precedent set in Brady v. Maryland (373 US 83, 1963), “T Does the issue matter? Advice from an eminent constitutional lawyer is that it does: “The Constitution is the supreme law of the US. We amend it, or we abide by it.” He expects a credible court challenge to the authenticity of Mr. Obama’s birth certificate soon. If it occurs, and if the certificate is a forgery, the constitutional consequences will be grave.
Standing, by virtue of direct, personal harm involved in a criminal indictment/conviction? What types of cases would this involve?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2900297/posts
Judge to Plaintiff: “Can you amend that he was born outside of the jurisdiction of the United States?”
Judge Lewis asked Attorney Klayman during the second hearing on June 10, 2012 “if I give you leave to amend can you amend that he was born somewhere outside of the jurisdiction of the United States?” to which the reply was yes.
Out of hundreds of Obama usurpation cases, this may be the first time this goes to discovery against Obama. :-)
Both sides were required to prepare proposed orders and briefs by Monday. Monday came and went. Now they had another hearing yesterday? of which no one knows what happened! Not even WND or Klayman himself. Something is not right here.I’m hoping but thats not much.
Sheriff Joe was going to give another Presser with BIG STUFF. Never happened. This was to be in June. In light of the Arizona decision I would think Sheriff Joe would be hastening the Presser. Any thoughts!
I’ve read about a purported “inside source” close to the Arpaio Posse that evidence is still coming in about the Kenyan Obama. And they are being very ambiguous or sly about when they’ll give their next Arpaio presser.
Then it gets appealed to guess where...
Posted by Piffle on Fogblow:
“Based on Lying Larry's whine, it would appear that Hizzoner granted defendants’ motion to strike the amended complaint.
“Beyond that, I think we'll have to wait to see something from the court or a non-birther source to interpret Larry's screed. It seems likely that the court dismissed his operational complaint without prejudice. That's one possible explanation for why Larry believes he can refile along the lines of the amended complaint.”
Klayman is interpreted by Fogblowers as stating that he can re-file a completely new complaint including the claims rejected in the SAC, but Lewis would be unlikely to accept the claims. Lewis has not yet ruled on the Motion to Dismiss (MOT) the First Amended Complaint on which the earlier hearing was held, IIRC.
Thats good news. Thanks for the updATE. Keep the faith.
The money to be made in this case is in discovery anything else is gravy. A ruling against Obama would go far; go to appeal where OBummer would have to fight harder in court. :-) We all know that our government institutions are corrupt. Move the ball down the field is what I want to see here.
0b0z0 Florida eligibility Ping..............
Thank you, Seizethecarp.
Uh, like Roberts would trash the US Constitution again and stand by the usurper he swore in behind closed doors?
Find it yet? Until found, I'll take this as "speculation on that point" by the bong smoking, fruity-nut FoGOBots.
"Judge Lewis denied Plaintiff’s 2nd Amended Complaint, which requested a declatory judgment. Attorney Larry Klayman pointed out there is nothing to stop him from filing a new complaint with that in it, but Lewis wouldn’t change his mind. So, we have to spend another $600 to do that and tie up more court resources. In any case, the existing case arguments stand and must still be decided upon, too. Folks, we are running behind on resources to fund the case as it is already, so any help would be appreciated."
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/report-on-voeltz-v-obama-teleconference-hearing-today
Read the comments too. :-)
hear ,here
The press conference they held in Phoenix back in early March was postponed at least twice. Perhaps this one, originally scheduled for late June, is being delayed to maximize the timing. The media will do everything to bury this story and with all news this past week, Obama Care, Fast & Furious, CO wild fires, etc., it would be easy to do.
There is no US constitution.
There are only men, and there is only the tyranny of those men.
America was killed on Thursday, June 28 by Chief Justice John Roberts.
What people are failing to realize here is that Barack Obama made an end run around the constitution, and he flat out won.
Those people who said he was incompetent, in over his head, a rookie were describing themselves.
Barack Obama is The Destroyer, and that is all there is to it.
Those people who said he was incompetent, in over his head, a rookie were describing themselves.
Wonder why they insisted he was an idiot? I mean there is no advantange for our side to under estimate Oblamea?
Thanks for the ping.
Oh, I see, only people not in opposition are allowed to oppose. That makes sense in a liberal, twisted, evil sort of way.
I can only guess that those who did under estimate him don't really know what his actual purpose is.
This image really says it all, and it always did. The game is over, the Devil wins.
Paging Sheriff Arpaio, paging Sheriff Arpaio..
the latest word is mid-July. It was probably pushed back because of “timing”..the nobamatax/supremes and fast and furious plus july 4th break. No point having a press conference if it gets buried.
why the demands ?.....it is an investigation.....
Joe et al know the landscape and July 27th is the next BIG TIME presser
an investigation does not move at the whim of the pitchfork
but rather on the certainty a pitchfork is gonna be used
No demands...just wanted to know what progress was being made....Last thing we’d heard it was going to be in early June, then later, then end of June. July 27 is fine for BIG TIME pitchfork....Probably won’t end then either.
Thanks. I doubt if Joe is postponing due to outside news, but more evidence as you’ve pointed out.
Hope you are feeling better.
The next date is definitely set for the 27th? I’ll plug it in to my calendar if so.
Do we think the info they’ll reveal will truly rock odumbo’s world?? It’s my opinion that ALL of the information Joe has revealed so far has been devastating to that loser and yet, not a damn thing happens. This really confirms that we’re in a spiritual warfare.
Is there particular significance to 7-27? Just asking.
I would LOVE to see him off the ballot in Florida.
But it’s not going to happen.
He’s got too much tied up in voter fraud in that state.
Unexpected turn in eligibility case: ‘Put it on record!’
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2901466/posts?page=4
Thank for th Pings. There’s some good back and forth in the comments below the article at WT. I notice Dr. Conspiracy himself is in the fray, if anyone wants a piece of him.
Gee... I wonder....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.