Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum: Romneycare 'hasn't worked in Mass'- 'voting for Romney over Obama a clear choice for me'
Ny Daily News ^ | June 29, 2012 | Kristen A. Lee /

Posted on 06/30/2012 2:43:06 PM PDT by Innovative

Santorum, however, noted that Romney has vowed to repeal Obama's health care law.

He said voting for Romney over Obama is a "clear choice for me."

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1morelastchance; agitatorsforobams; backstabberromney; elections; iwontvoteforromney; loserromney; mitt4romney; obama; obamacare; proobamaspammers; rinoromney; romney; romney4nytimes; romneycare; romneycare4all; romneycare4u; romneydeathpanels; romneytherino; santorum; verminromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201 next last
To: JLLH
I doubt it will be comprehended by those who claim to be conservatives while using the term as a club with which to beat others who disagree with them.

Seriously?

So if I disagree with you, I am beating you over the head YET if you disagree with me, I am incapable of understanding.

Got it.

181 posted on 07/03/2012 7:41:46 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: svcw

I wasn’t really referencing your behavior in particular, but it’s interesting you would take it to mean you in particular.


182 posted on 07/03/2012 7:43:24 PM PDT by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: JLLH

Oh, please.
Nice try.
I will repeat:
I do not support BHO or Romney, I will not vote for either.


183 posted on 07/03/2012 7:46:45 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Think you can cry a little more and throw yourself on the ground a little harder? Here’s a tissue...your act is getting old...fast.


184 posted on 07/03/2012 7:51:14 PM PDT by MissouriConservative (Voting Anyone but Obama in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Ok -— and??


185 posted on 07/03/2012 8:08:26 PM PDT by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Finny

I notice that you use the dem lying talking points and are a surrogate for 0. Your posts could have been written by a commie occupier. I’m ashamed that such a foul person lives in my country. You are not worthy of any further communication. (Snitch on me and have me banished if you like, low life. I’m sick of you and your buddies.)


186 posted on 07/03/2012 9:15:10 PM PDT by balls (0 lies like a Muslim (Google "taqiyya"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Finny
who understand how dangerous Romney is and how exaggerated the claims of Obama's threat.

One thing that I've heard is that he's good because he's a "windsock" -- blowing with the popular/political wind -- apparently the guy never heard the saying: he who stands for nothing will fall for anything. (They also discount the possibilities of 1. being hit with the "nobody I know fallacy", or 2. that he's simply lying, telling people what he thinks they want to hear.)

187 posted on 07/03/2012 9:27:41 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
Wait a second, you and the other Mitt sycophants are accusing all here who are not willing to drop to our knees for Romney Obama supporters and the like, say we are voting for Obama and other such crap.

We have documented factual information on Romney that has long been accepted here even by many of those who have panic and run to Mitt despite his total lack of any real Conservative accomplishment.

You attack those who won't bow down and sound like the Whiners over at TBL.

And you accuse Conservatives here of lies and abuse?

Sweet Jesus that is the very definition of derangement, and self aggrandizement as well...

188 posted on 07/03/2012 10:56:11 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

You are completely out of your mind.

Try sobriety, diet modification, exercise, and Jesus.

If that doesn’t work, talk to a mental health professional.


189 posted on 07/03/2012 11:03:42 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: balls

Please illustrate how I have used Democrat talking points in my posts.


190 posted on 07/03/2012 11:05:37 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam; ejonesie22; Finny

rogue yam, You are pathetic.

If a person is not on their KNEES to ROMNEY
and ignoring his imposition of DEATH PANELS and GAY MARRIAGE
And SOCIALIZED MEDICINE,
and is not attacking anyone who speaks TRUTH,
then according to YOU, they are for Obama.

NOPE. They are Patriots protecting America from
scum and Obama.


191 posted on 07/04/2012 3:19:24 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Finny
Wow! Even for a guy who is voting for Romney and urging others to join him, I must say your intellectual arguments here are very compelling! *snort*,

And a quick look through some of your other comments and sane folks reactions to them indicates that you really have a handle on how Obam's threat is "overrated" so we should fear Romney more than another 4 years of Obama - you seem to attribute it to the same "superior knowledge" phenomenom that Holder tried to use when he had no cogent argument to back his point. If you have such "superior knowledge" about why the rest of us are nuts with our ABO movement, while you are still stuck on the ABR bit, even if it means more OBama, perhaps you should share the knowledge instead of smugly claiming to have it. I think the guy who compared you to Alynski might have something.

192 posted on 07/04/2012 4:31:59 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

Jim, You really need to let your feelings out more, this hiding behind niceities is going to be your downfall...


193 posted on 07/04/2012 5:59:16 AM PDT by RaceBannon (I wont vote for a gay marriage marxist gun grabber, or vote for Obama, either)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

I love you man LOL!


194 posted on 07/04/2012 6:05:48 AM PDT by RaceBannon (I wont vote for a gay marriage marxist gun grabber, or vote for Obama, either)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Funny that was about what I expected as a reply. It’s all you have. If you could prove your accusations you would do so, any reasoned person would.

Don’t worry I understand.

If you are looking for “friends” to share your anti freeper rants there is a web site for that...

We’ll be here and I will do all I can to keep the I told you so gentle...


195 posted on 07/04/2012 7:13:35 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

You are campaigning for Obama.

Right here, right now.

Like everyone else seeking his re-election, you will tell any lie to advance your cause.

There is nothing more to your posts than that.


196 posted on 07/04/2012 7:25:09 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
For what it's worth ALL the Presidential assassins have come from the Left or from the ranks of the Democrats.

None of them have been Republicans.

History shows that Republicans are quite willing to impeach presidents instead.

Regarding such people, most minds leap instantly to Bill Clinton ~ but he's rather dull compared to President Johnson ~ quite possibly the Republican party's first non-Whig RINO

This guy converted from Democrat to Lincoln's running mate in the 1864 campaign without batting an eye ~ he made every promise to every group though. Even convinced some top drawer Radical Republicans (the Freedom loving element of politics in those days ~ people like those you find at Free Republic) that he was one of the good guys.

Then he screwed up everybody and everything. As a former Senator other Senators were loathe to vote to convict him, so he wasn't convicted ~ but he was shur 'nuff impeached by the Republican controlled House. Lincoln, though, was murdered by your typical unreconstructed Democrat ~ a man much like Nancy Pelosi ~ given to make-up and facial reconstruction ~ and he imagined everyone just loved him too!

Good write up on Johnson at http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/USAjohnsonA.htm ~ he had a career much like that of Mitt Romney.

Best time to get rid of such folks is at the Convention before the votes. What we don't need is another RINO we have to impeach!

197 posted on 07/04/2012 7:28:16 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
Hmm ~ let me say this about that. Andrew Johnson actually appeared before groups of freed slaves and told them he'd be their Moses on the trip to freedom, then he'd appear before white groups and advocate Jim Crow laws.

Unlike Romney he felt some guilt and became a really hardcore alcoholic. Romney feels no pain promising both sides of an issue!

198 posted on 07/04/2012 7:32:38 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Finny
Both the major parties are just now beginning to detect the vast voter drop-offs ~ as people reject obama and romney.

A minor third-party candidacy in a single state could probably tip the results either way, and in a major drop off you are dealing with incalculable winning probabilities ~ which will mean the talking heads will blame Virgil Goode for either loss ~ kind of the way they did that several times with Ralph Nader.

At the same time both parties will be sitting there with the cold hard facts that they're running about 30 million voters behind 2008!

The mittbots already know this ~ they've got Ralph Reed on board and he's telling them what to do to get out the Evangelical vote ~ which he has failed to figure out several times before (much to his own distress when he tried running for office).

So far nobody has come up with anything to encourage the Evangelicals to vote ~ and this time that may well include the black Evangelicals!

199 posted on 07/04/2012 7:46:17 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Okey Dokey, if you say so...


200 posted on 07/04/2012 8:05:14 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson