Skip to comments.Unexpected turn in eligibility case: 'Put it on record!'
Posted on 06/30/2012 5:26:50 PM PDT by Brown Deer
Attorney Larry Klayman told WND he had expected an uneventful hearing in the ongoing case, which returned before Judge Terry Lewis yesterday, but instead found a legal tangle that he believes means Lewis will have to make a decision, have to put it on record.
Lewis would have to reach a decision; he would have to put it on record, Klayman said. By amending for declaratory relief, were pulling the rug right out from Obama and the Florida secretary of state.
This judge cant get out from under his legal requirement, Klayman said. If he screws around, hes violating law.
Still, he said, I want Lewis to address the issue of eligibility and create a record, so we can take it up before the election. Im still confident, hopeful that will happen.
There is credible evidence indicating that this electronically produced birth certificate is entirely fraudulent or otherwise altered. No physical, paper copy of the actual long form birth certificate has been produced in order to definitively establish Barack Hussein Obamas birth within the United States.
The plaintiff has submitted affidavits from Arpaio and others to support the claim.
When asked by Judge Lewis, Klayman confirmed he could add to the complaint details of the evidence Obama was not born in the U.S.
Klayman referred to a recent Obama order to underscore the significance of the Founders desire that the president not have divided loyalties or not even a hint of foreign influence.
Just a few days ago, he issued an executive order
which in effect allows illegal alien students who came into this country
to remain in this country.
The presidents own father was in fact here on a student visa and ultimately was deported because that visa expired.
(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.wnd.com ...
Leon County designated this as a high profile case so that the progress and pleadings can be reviewed online:
I’m sorry, but after this week, how can anyone think this Supreme Court would find that Barack Obama is not a U.S. citizen?
They’d be more likely to say he’s exempt from the 8-year term limit than to say he’s ineligible to be President.
Popcorn, popcorn,.......definitely gonna need more popcorn for this one...
Well I certainly hope the judge doesn't read this on the internet. This kind of statement wouldn't exactly endear Klayman to the judge.
SCOTUS has already ruled that Obama is not eligible but can still be President because he is a TAX
Exactly. No way in h e doublehockeysticks is milquetoast roberts going to make such a decision. Even if Obama admitted he was born in Kenya at prime time on CBS, Roberts would find a way to make him eligible. After all, if a something can be both a tax and not a tax at the same time, then a person can be born in Kenya AND Hawaii at the same time.
We need to have all this stuff recorded regardless of whether or not it is acted on or not by the courts.
Who knows what the future holds.
Agree with this. Get it into the record no matter what.
They know they're scumbags and we know they're scumbags let the future know they're scumbags. ;-)
You can't ever win by giving up.
Well, Larry, now that you’ve broadcast to the world how important it is, the Judge is going to give you the shaft, just to stay out of trouble with his cocktail party friends. Good work keeping the old trap shut. Just like old times, Larry....good times...
All that will do is provide a precedent.
Do you want to see President Arnold Schwarzenegger?
If he screws around, hes violating law.
And you think that leaves the judge with sleepless nights?
We all know Obama is probably illegal in one way or another. This matter should be dealt with and Obama should be relieved of his duties as POTUS.
Judges don’t violate the law, they write it.
Does someone actually think we have a Constitution?
It’s already a precedent.
Besides, we don’t actually even know if Obama is even a citizen.
Despite the fact that lawlessness has taken over these past four years, it doesn’t negate the Constitution.
There has been no Constitutional Amendment.
Roberts be damned. He’s not a black-robed king.
He can be removed according to the Constitution.
Evidently that’s what judges do, and do well, is violate the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.