Unexpected turn in eligibility case: 'Put it on record!'

wnd ^ | 6/30/2012 | Drew Zahn

[Brown Deer]

Attorney Larry Klayman told WND he had expected an “uneventful” hearing in the ongoing case, which returned before Judge Terry Lewis yesterday, but instead found a legal tangle that he believes means Lewis will “have to make a decision, have to put it on record.”

“Lewis would have to reach a decision; he would have to put it on record,” Klayman said. “By amending for declaratory relief, we’re pulling the rug right out from Obama and the Florida secretary of state.”

“This judge can’t get out from under his legal requirement,” Klayman said. “If he screws around, he’s violating law.”

Still, he said, “I want Lewis to address the issue of eligibility and create a record, so we can take it up before the election. I’m still confident, hopeful that will happen.”

There is credible evidence indicating that this electronically produced birth certificate is entirely fraudulent or otherwise altered. No physical, paper copy of the actual long form birth certificate has been produced in order to definitively establish Barack Hussein Obama’s birth within the United States.

The plaintiff has submitted affidavits from Arpaio and others to support the claim.

When asked by Judge Lewis, Klayman confirmed he could add to the complaint details of the evidence Obama was not born in the U.S.

Klayman referred to a recent Obama order to underscore the significance of the Founders’ desire that the president not have divided loyalties or “not even a hint of foreign influence.”

“Just a few days ago, he issued an executive order … which in effect allows illegal alien students who came into this country … to remain in this country. … The president’s own father was in fact here on a student visa and ultimately was deported because that visa expired.”

[esquirette]

Leon County designated this as a high profile case so that the progress and pleadings can be reviewed online:

http://www.clerk.leon.fl.us/index.php?section=205&server=cvweb&page=cvimage/high_profile/index.asp

[Brown Deer]

Klayman originally filed the challenge to Obama’s eligibility for the ballot on behalf of Michael Voeltz, who identifies himself as “a registered member of the Democratic Party, voter and taxpayer in Broward County.”

“Lewis would have to reach a decision; he would have to put it on record,” Klayman said. “By amending for declaratory relief, we’re pulling the rug right out from Obama and the Florida secretary of state.”

Klayman told WND Obama’s lawyers immediately went into a tailspin and filed to have the amendment for declaratory relief stricken, which the judge granted, arguing he wanted to wait to issue a formal decision in the case.

But Klayman said his team is willing to file a stand-alone complaint for declaratory relief with Lewis as soon as next week and “pull the rug out from under him, too.”

[Bratch]

I’m sorry, but after this week, how can anyone think this Supreme Court would find that Barack Obama is not a U.S. citizen?

They’d be more likely to say he’s exempt from the 8-year term limit than to say he’s ineligible to be President.

[contrarian]

Popcorn, popcorn,.......definitely gonna need more popcorn for this one...

[2111USMC]

But Klayman said his team is willing to file a stand-alone complaint for declaratory relief with Lewis as soon as next week and “pull the rug out from under him, too.”

Well I certainly hope the judge doesn't read this on the internet. This kind of statement wouldn't exactly endear Klayman to the judge.

[DrDude]

SCOTUS has already ruled that Obama is not eligible but can still be President because he is a TAX

[HerrBlucher]

Exactly. No way in h e doublehockeysticks is milquetoast roberts going to make such a decision. Even if Obama admitted he was born in Kenya at prime time on CBS, Roberts would find a way to make him eligible. After all, if a something can be both a tax and not a tax at the same time, then a person can be born in Kenya AND Hawaii at the same time.

[Smokeyblue]

"Klayman told WND Obama’s lawyers immediately went into a tailspin and filed to have the amendment for declaratory relief stricken, which the judge granted, arguing he wanted to wait to issue a formal decision in the case."

Interesting reaction.

[Red Steel]

LoL.

[Smokeyblue]

We need to have all this stuff recorded regardless of whether or not it is acted on or not by the courts.

Who knows what the future holds.

[thecodont]

Agree with this. Get it into the record no matter what.

[Red Steel]

We need to have all this stuff recorded regardless of whether or not it is acted on or not by the courts.

Agreed.

They know they're scumbags and we know they're scumbags let the future know they're scumbags. ;-)

You can't ever win by giving up.

[Cyber Liberty]

Well, Larry, now that you’ve broadcast to the world how important it is, the Judge is going to give you the shaft, just to stay out of trouble with his cocktail party friends. Good work keeping the old trap shut. Just like old times, Larry....good times...

[Bratch]

All that will do is provide a precedent.

Do you want to see President Arnold Schwarzenegger?

[353FMG]

“If he screws around, he’s violating law.”

.
And you think that leaves the judge with sleepless nights?

[freekitty]

We all know Obama is probably illegal in one way or another. This matter should be dealt with and Obama should be relieved of his duties as POTUS.

[ChildOfThe60s]

Judges don’t violate the law, they write it.

Does someone actually think we have a Constitution?

[Smokeyblue]

It’s already a precedent.

Besides, we don’t actually even know if Obama is even a citizen.

Despite the fact that lawlessness has taken over these past four years, it doesn’t negate the Constitution.

There has been no Constitutional Amendment.

Roberts be damned. He’s not a black-robed king.

He can be removed according to the Constitution.

[izzatzo]

Evidently that’s what judges do, and do well, is violate the law.