Posted on 07/01/2012 9:01:45 AM PDT by Zakeet
Edited on 07/01/2012 9:16:48 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
Mary Richardson Kennedy had to scrounge for cash to pay for even the most basic needs in the last months of her life, according to new court filings.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
...don’t forget lobotomized.
Do not understand why people think these in-breds (yes they are in-breds...take a close look) are something special
They are so abusive to their women-folk
I feel for Mary Richardson.
Anybody who marries into the old Joe Kennedy clan is nuts.
“To think he has custody of the children makes me puke. Harder than that OJ had custody after killing his kids’ mother.”
Yeah, kids are always better off in the custody of the addict, alcoholic, suicidal parent.
This is what BFF means today.
Don’t forget drowning!
Actually, I was thinking of other guardians from the mother's side or among her friends, in that the mother is dead. Or weren't you aware? And perhaps you think RFKjr is not a drug-abusing alcoholic as well?
Whut? Ya mean der ain’t one bout the Waitress samwich?
LOL, creative people can make BFF into something quite nasty. And we can give thanks to Glenn Close, a nasty piece of work in and of herself.
This guy is an absolute pig. But, since he’s a Kennedy, that’s to be expected.
You are absolutely right, get those kids away from RFK immediately! Don’t they have family on their mother’s side?
I'm unfamiliar with this. Can you elaborate?
“Please don’t peddle this crap. RFK, Jr. might be a Grade A #1 A$$, but contrary to popular opinion, folks don’t ‘pay off the Church’ to get an annulment”
You need to get real. I’m catholic and happy to be one but the truth is that if you have enough influence and cash you can get an annullment. RFK jr. managed to get the church to annul his 13 year marriage over the strenuous objections of his wife. I guess she felt like the marriage was valid all along.
Annullment in the catholic church basically says the marriage was never valid in the first place. There are four or five reasons you can use. Getting bored with wife #1 and wanting a younger model is not on the list. So for all intents and purposes that would make his kids illegitimate.
The word and the concept "bastard" is in dictionaries and is (or was) found in civil law, but the concept and word do not exist in Catholic canon law. There is no such category. If a man and a woman have a child, the child is termed their "natural child" and nothing else. Neither divorce nor annulment changes that.
Second, RFK Jr's second marriage was performed by Justice DONALD N. SILVERMAN of the New York State Supreme Court onboard a boat in the Hudson River. You don't need to be a canon lawyer to see that this was not a Catholic wedding.
Third, marriage tribunals do not post publicly the reasons why they end up with a finding of nullity. Sometimes it's because it became clear that the original wedding vows were fraudulent, e.g. one or both of the spouses never intended an exclusive, faithful, lifelong marriage. Therefore, fraud. Without knowing anything more than that, I think we'd be entitled to assume that if the tribunal judges said they found fraud in the RFK-Emily Black marriage vows, they probably did.
“RFK Jr. (Kennedy) cut off late wife’s credit”
So? Why would his, LATE (dead), wife need credit?
As in lobotomized on Joseph Kennedy's insistence.
Sorry, you were first.
A finding of nullity is a judgment of a chuch court (tribunal) which, after reviewing evidence and testimony, conludes that there was some severe defect in the marriage vows from the git-go.
A defective vow isn't a vow; and without authentic vows there cannot be a binding sacramental marriage.
If one of the parties to the vows was drunk, on drugs, underage, mentally defective, under threat or duress (gun to their head), ineligible to marry (because of blood relationship or because of being already married to somebody else, for instance), knowingly lying to or deceiving the other party --- for any such reasons or similar, the tribunal finds that the marriage was never sacramental, because the vow was a "nullity."
This has no impact whatsoever on civil marriage or on the civil legal status of the would-be spouses or their children.
What it does have impact on, is the canonicity of the original marriage. By bringing objective evidence and standards to bear on the validity of a marriage, it should be an aid to the examination of conscience. If the parties have a conscience.
May God help these wretched people.
Let it be known, from this day forward, Kennedy killed another woman.
The same family that lobotomized and locked away a sister, drove into a creek and left a squeeze-mama to drown alone, a family who whelped a son, who as president, treated women like whores.
If there is a ‘’Kennedy Curse’’, it’s well deserved. May the entire clan suffer most horribly.
Let it be known, from this day forward, Kennedy killed another woman.
The same family that lobotomized and locked away a sister, drove into a creek and left a squeeze-mama to drown alone, a family who whelped a son, who as president, treated women like whores.
If there is a ‘’Kennedy Curse’’, it’s well deserved. May the entire clan suffer most horribly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.