Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roberts Switched Views to Uphold Health Care Law (Original CBS Report)
CBS News ^ | Sunday, Juy 1, 2012 | Jan Crawford

Posted on 07/01/2012 12:16:38 PM PDT by kristinn

Chief Justice John Roberts initially sided with the Supreme Court's four conservative justices to strike down the heart of President Obama's health care reform law, the Affordable Care Act, but later changed his position and formed an alliance with liberals to uphold the bulk of the law, according to two sources with specific knowledge of the deliberations.

Roberts then withstood a month-long, desperate campaign to bring him back to his original position, the sources said. Ironically, Justice Anthony Kennedy - believed by many conservatives to be the justice most likely to defect and vote for the law - led the effort to try to bring Roberts back to the fold....

But in this closely-watched case, word of Roberts' unusual shift has spread widely within the Court, and is known among law clerks, chambers' aides and secretaries. It also has stirred the ire of the conservative justices, who believed Roberts was standing with them.

After the historic oral arguments in March, the two knowledgeable sources said, Roberts and the four conservatives were poised to strike down at least the individual mandate. There were other issues being argued - severability and the Medicaid extension - but the mandate was the ballgame.

SNIP

It is not known why Roberts changed his view on the mandate and decided to uphold the law. At least one conservative justice tried to get him to explain it, but was unsatisfied with the response, according to a source with knowledge of the conversation.

SNIP

Roberts then engaged in his own lobbying effort - trying to persuade at least Justice Kennedy to join his decision so the Court would appear more united in the case. There was a fair amount of give-and-take with Kennedy and other justices, the sources said. One justice, a source said, described it as "arm-twisting."

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: activistcourt; activistjudge; badlaw; blackmail; cultureofcorruption; defeatthemedia; illegaladoption; illegalinfluence; impeachment; johnroberts; judicialactivism; mainstreammedia; mediabias; msm; msmcourt; msmownscourt; msmownsobamacare; msmownsroberts; msmownsscotus; obamacare; obamascandals; obamunism; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-311 next last
Prior thread on Newsbusters article about reporter Jan Crawford on Face the Nation this morning.
1 posted on 07/01/2012 12:16:51 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kristinn

He was threatened.


2 posted on 07/01/2012 12:18:57 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Some people just hate Americans and America although they can’t explain why.


3 posted on 07/01/2012 12:20:32 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Dude! Where's my Constitution?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Traitor. Pure. And. Simple.


4 posted on 07/01/2012 12:21:27 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Obama, the coverup king, has had his evil regime dig up some dirt on Roberts. They may have a photo of him french kissing a poodle.


5 posted on 07/01/2012 12:21:31 PM PDT by IbJensen (If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Early-onset Alzheimer’s?


6 posted on 07/01/2012 12:22:15 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

He wasn’t threatened, he was bought. He loves corporations.


7 posted on 07/01/2012 12:23:30 PM PDT by Jake8898
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

I really believe that the threat of mob violence and burning cities has many “leaders” scared witless.


8 posted on 07/01/2012 12:24:33 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

french kissing a poodle


Whoa..I guess he really is secretly a liberal.


9 posted on 07/01/2012 12:24:57 PM PDT by Leep (Enemy of the StatistI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

ObamaTAX, compliments of CJ Roberts.


10 posted on 07/01/2012 12:26:46 PM PDT by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efHCdKb5UWc#t=55s


11 posted on 07/01/2012 12:30:33 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

Heartily agree.


12 posted on 07/01/2012 12:30:48 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Where am I wrong here :

the Affordable Care Act has 300+ pages detailing how the US goverment will control and regulate the industry as well as force participation of the citizens in the federal governments regulation of what is a wide range of PUBLIC entities.

The governement regulation and control of public entities IN THIS MANNER is not authorized under the general welfare clause or the interstate commerce clause and certainly does not fit the enumerated powers.

I blame the five "justices" who did not do their job of interpreting constitutionality, but instead twisted a morsel of fabricated fact (that it is a tax contrary to what the content of the bill details) in order to justify their personal paradigm of socialism.

Even if it is in fact a tax is not their business, taxation is certainly at the discretion of congress. the issue in question was this ; does congress have the authority to regulate public entities and force the people to fund their imposition ?

it is exactly the same as if they passed "the Affordable Car Act", forcing a tax in order to make you buy a car, with 300 pages detailing how they will control each car company and how they will decide what car you will have , the fact that it is funded by a tax does NOT address the constitutionality of the act but is merly a deflection and dereliction of the duties of a cheif justice

?

13 posted on 07/01/2012 12:31:02 PM PDT by KTM rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

14 posted on 07/01/2012 12:31:08 PM PDT by Lockbar (March toward the sound of the guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

15 posted on 07/01/2012 12:31:17 PM PDT by Lockbar (March toward the sound of the guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Time for Impeachment


16 posted on 07/01/2012 12:31:27 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
Roberts was blackmailed over the illegal adoption of his children.

XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THU AUG 04, 2005 11:35:09 ET XXXXX

NY TIMES INVESTIGATES ADOPTION RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEE’S CHILDREN


**Exclusive**

The DRUDGE REPORT has uncovered a plot in the NEW YORK TIMES’ newsroom to look into the adoption of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts.

The TIMES has investigative reporter Glen Justice hot on the case to investigate adoption records of Judge Roberts’ two young children, Josie age 5 and Jack age 4, a top source reveals.

Judge Roberts and his wife Jane adopted the children when they each were infants.

Both children were adopted from Latin America.

TIMES insider claims the look into the adoptions are part of the paper’s “standard background check.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2900724/posts
17 posted on 07/01/2012 12:31:54 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
He was threatened.

Or his family, to which I respond, "Lives, fortunes, and Sacred Honor," and all that crap, right Johnny boy? You did know that with high honor comes great risk, didn't you? /s

It's not like I haven't taken similar risks myself.

18 posted on 07/01/2012 12:33:35 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

The reporter on the Fox News panel from the Washington Post says “Roberts plays chess while everybody else plays checkers.” He notes that Roberts got 2 of the liberals to go along with him against Medicaid expansion and is reaping what amounts to “strange new respect” from the left as a “reasonable guy.” He claims that sets him up to be able to return to the conservative side in upcoming votes next year on affirmative action and some provisions of the voting rights act. Plus , it appears to me the left recognizes he really handed them a hot potato with the “taxation with misrepresentation” decision. Chrissy Mathews panel of experts voted 8-4 that Romney would be wise to downplay Obamacare , so that tells you Romney should do the opposite. So even if unintentional, Roberts is going to help the Republicans re-take the Senate and the White House.


19 posted on 07/01/2012 12:35:37 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

“Obama, the coverup king, has had his evil regime dig up some dirt on Roberts. They may have a photo of him french kissing a poodle.”

Didn’t they already do that in order to get the super-secret SECOND swearing-in by CJ Roberts a few years ago?


20 posted on 07/01/2012 12:36:57 PM PDT by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-311 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson