To: NoLibZone
I think Robert’s decision is wrong, but he sure put a crimp on furure Commerce Clause challenges.
7 posted on
07/01/2012 4:44:52 PM PDT by
umgud
(No Rats, No Rino's)
To: umgud
10 posted on
07/01/2012 4:47:34 PM PDT by
MileHi
( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
To: umgud
"he sure put a crimp on future Commerce Clause challenges. "
Only until there is a 5th true blue (actually red) lib on the panel. The four libs have no respect for CJR's opinion on the Commerce Clause - read Ginsburg's dissent.
19 posted on
07/01/2012 4:54:21 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: umgud
I think Robert’s decision is wrong, but he sure put a crimp on furure Commerce Clause challenges.
No he didn't. Future leftist courts (and that's what we're going to have into the foreseeable future) will just disregard Robert's bloviating nonsense and rule however they want. That's how it works now. We have no constitution. We have rule by whatever the elites want.
43 posted on
07/01/2012 7:16:00 PM PDT by
Antoninus
(Sorry, gone rogue.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson