Posted on 07/07/2012 9:26:47 AM PDT by Meet the New Boss
In my previously published article "Secrets Revealed," I concluded that what President Obama is concealing on his genuine long-form birth certificate (not the digital PDF forgery released to the public) is that his mother signed her maiden name.
snip
Personally, I think the preponderance of evidence shows that Obama's marriage to Ann Dunham was a legal contrivance that suited both their purposes -- Obama's as a means to maintain residency in the U.S. until he completed his studies, and Ann's (and maybe also her parents') to provide legitimacy to the baby's birth. In no way was this a meaningful marital relationship.
So were they really married? Yes, they went through the legal steps to become married. But because Obama the father was already married, the marriage wasn't legal -- and it certainly wasn't functional -- so they weren't really married in the way we understand marriage.
I know that my conclusion -- that Ann likely signed her maiden name to baby Barack's birth certificate because her marriage wasn't a real one, and that that's what's being hidden by the release of the "birth certificate" forgery -- is a huge disappointment to people who think that the president is hiding something much bigger -- like being born in Kenya. (Understandably, since releasing the digital PDF fake is a pretty big scam to cover up a pretty unimportant detail.)
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
From what I have read, there is no evidence they ever even lived together. Obama’s whole life is a fabrication and Americans are idiots for not seeing that.
It’s in the divorce papers. But that doesn’t make it real. If it was real, then where is the marriage license, at what church or civil office did the wedding occur, who performed the ceremony?
The media had important things to investigate in 08 - like the status of Joe the Plumber’s trade license and the DNA of Palin’s Down Syndrome child.
There wasn’t time to spend on Baraq.
I don’t buy it. Even if his parents weren’t married, Obama can hardly be blamed for that. Weren’t Bill Clinton’s parents unmarried? Besides, liberals think it’s just fine to have babies out of wedlock. Mustn’t judge, by all means! If anything, being born out of wedlock would only give BO more liberal sympathy and cred.
No. There has to be a bigger reason he’s hiding the real birth certificate.
I don’t think they were ever married, though there is a “divorce.” maybe they did some kind of tribal marriage. But probably not. However, it doesn’t matter. In Obama’s own book, he says he never really wanted to know whether his parents were actually married. So it isn’t worth covering up a birth certificate for that reason.
Occam’s razor has Stanley giving birth in Canada. She was first seen in Seattle, and baby Barack has had document problems his whole life. She was probably going to give him up at the unwed mother’s home in Vancouver, but decided in a rare fit of “love” to keep the baby.
“Him (garbage) + Her (whore) = 0bummer (filth).”
Perfect. She was a liberal whitey who hated her own race and married Odumbo, who in turn cheated on his white wife by banging another tribeswoman in his tribe back in Africa.
The Obama family makes the Kennedy’s look like the Partridge family.
A few things about the marriage to Sr. are still a little suspect. One is that, as far as I know, there has never been a copy of the marriage cert. I know that there was no engagement, marriage app., or marriage announcement in either Honolulu newspaper. I know that Sr. listed multiple Honolulu addresses in his INS records, but in the Polk directories he listed only the one address. No where, except in the “newspaper birth announcements” was there a hint of Sr. living at the address listed for the Dumhams in the Polk directories. Stanley Ann was listed in both the Honolulu Polk and the Polk in WA for the 1961-1962 canvas. She is NOT listed as a “Mrs.” in the Honolulu Polk, but is a Mrs. in the Seattle WA Polk. Here is what I wrote about that awhile back on my blog:
-Then she is also published (listed) in the 1961-1962 Seattle Wash. Polk where she moved after only having lived in Hawaii a short time (and what, six months after marrying?). So, back then the info for the Polks was collected-according to what I’ve been able to find out- much like a census. A combo of mailed forms and door to door info collectors. So, lets get into the way back machine, shall we? Hawaii collects some info over a period of months. Then they mail it in to the mainland, likely be ship, but perhaps by air. Then it goes in queue to be inspected and set to print. MANUALLY. Remember that this is 1961. When did the Polk actually end up being printed? For example, was the 1961-1962 Polk printed in early 1962? How useful is a directory in which the info is already a year old by the time it could possibly have been printed? I don’t know. Just something that seems weird to me. Stanley is in both the Honolulu and the Seattle Polks for the same time frame, 1961-1962. Just how damn long did the data collection process go on for those Polks before they got around to the printing? 1961 style.-
Polk was just getting started with computers in 1961 - for auto vin numbers I think - I could not find the exact date when they began to use computers for the directories, but I think it was approx 1963.
I too have always thought it a stretch to have a shotgun wedding, and then not bother to give the slightest appearance of being married.
Then don’t forget Stanley would have to fly to WA with a baby less than a month old AND hunt down an apartment, to all appearances by herself.
“”Or did she have the baby at a home for troubled mothers across the border in Canada and then return to Seattle? And then grandma Toot submitted a dodgy affidavit of home birth that Obama Jr. has been trying to cover up ever since?””
I have always felt this to be a likely scenario IF obama was not actually born in HI. It just fits much better with the anomalies.
Your scenario is very plausible.
Obama Sr. told both INS officials and the University of Hawaii administrators that he had married Stanley Ann.
So I am prepared to believe that he went through with the ceremony (but probably very much regretted it when he found out that Stanley Ann had also been having sex with Davis and that maybe he wasn’t the father after all).
But I don’t completely exclude anything at this point.
LOL
You havent read the published records of Barack seniors correspndence with immigration officials to extend his student visa
His marriage to Dunham and fatherhood of her child (cited as living with her parents) are used repeatedly in his annual appeal to stray ... err, stay...in America
(The corresnpndence trail shows he was an arrogant pompous virtaully illiterate promiscuous POS, a grifter and a free loader, sponsored into scholarship in America by the Unitarian church ... bada bing! What was not to love for a broad minded white girl from Kansas?)
She was definitely a slut. Many pictures of her exist, of her nude with different men - confirmed real. Nice young girls don't do things like that.
I’ve always wondered why their are no Pregnant pic’s of stanley ann.. does anyone else find that strange?
theory only- the happy couple went to “Maui” for the wedding
It was performed by a nativist kahuna blowing a conch shell on the beach
Other wife in Africa? No problem, bro.
Bada bing
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.