Posted on 07/07/2012 9:26:47 AM PDT by Meet the New Boss
In my previously published article "Secrets Revealed," I concluded that what President Obama is concealing on his genuine long-form birth certificate (not the digital PDF forgery released to the public) is that his mother signed her maiden name.
snip
Personally, I think the preponderance of evidence shows that Obama's marriage to Ann Dunham was a legal contrivance that suited both their purposes -- Obama's as a means to maintain residency in the U.S. until he completed his studies, and Ann's (and maybe also her parents') to provide legitimacy to the baby's birth. In no way was this a meaningful marital relationship.
So were they really married? Yes, they went through the legal steps to become married. But because Obama the father was already married, the marriage wasn't legal -- and it certainly wasn't functional -- so they weren't really married in the way we understand marriage.
I know that my conclusion -- that Ann likely signed her maiden name to baby Barack's birth certificate because her marriage wasn't a real one, and that that's what's being hidden by the release of the "birth certificate" forgery -- is a huge disappointment to people who think that the president is hiding something much bigger -- like being born in Kenya. (Understandably, since releasing the digital PDF fake is a pretty big scam to cover up a pretty unimportant detail.)
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
He says they got married so that Stanley Ann could "provide legitimacy to the baby's birth."
And then he argues that Stanley Ann then didn't USE this legitimacy in the one place that was the whole purpose of the contrived marriage - to name Obama Sr. as the father on the birth certificate.
If the whole point of the marriage was to give legitimacy to the baby (from Ann's point of view) and help Sr. with his immigration status (from his point of view), then it makes absolutely NO sense at all that she then wouldn't go ahead and fill in her "husband's" name on the birth certificate.
A much more likely scenario that fits the facts:
Obama Sr., by all accounts a playboy, has a one-night stand (or maybe a two- or three-night stand) with Stanley Ann, who was among his conquests at the University of Hawaii.
When a baby resulted, Obama Sr. hestitatingly agrees to marry Stanley Ann.
At some point after the February ceremony Obama Sr. discovers that she had also been having sex with the much older Frank Marshall Davis. In addition to disgusting him, that raised a serious question in his mind as to whether he was really the father of the baby. And so from the point he learned about the Stanley Ann-Frank Marshall Davis sexual activity, he simply ignored Stanley Ann and her baby, at least until many years later when the boy was ten years old.
Absent a DNA test, to this day there may be no way of knowing which man's (or even someone else's) sperm fathered the baby.
What then happened? We know that Stanley Ann never appeared with the baby at the location her parents were living, according to a daughter of the family who lived there and from whom they were renting rooms.
And she didn't live with Obama Sr. He filled out an immigration form at the end of August 1961 in which he listed his family members and at that time was not even aware he had a new son.
It seems extremely implausible that Stanley Ann would check out of a hospital in Hawaii and NOT go live with the newborn at either her parents or her "husband".
The first place she is seen by anyone with the infant is in Seattle in August 1961.
Did the reckless girl go to Kenya (unaware of the first wife) to see the Obama grandparents to pressure Obama Sr. to take her back? Or did she have the baby at a home for troubled mothers across the border in Canada and then return to Seattle? And then grandma Toot submitted a dodgy affidavit of home birth that Obama Jr. has been trying to cover up ever since?
the widespread cover ups, forgeries, perjuries and records scrubs are way too extensive to cover a mere illegitimate birf
illegitimacy would bolster his street creds
There is NO RECORD of a February marriage btw Dunham & Obama.
Him (garbage) + Her (whore) = 0bummer (filth).
Response: It does not matter as their alleged progeny is still a disastrous B*stard.
As the article describes, the marriage is referred to in the Hawaii index of marriages, is referred to in the record of the 1964 divorce papers and is referred to in various INS documents from those years.
I speculated long ago the real secret was that 0 was a bastard.
I’ve always believed that FMD was his real father and that the rest is a fabricated cover-up that had to be given the utmost protection in recent years to maintain the Obama myth.
The side-by-side photos of BHO and FMD are just uncanny.
None of them may have known for sure just who the father was.
Obama’s father was forced to leave the country when Harvard reported to the State Department that he was not attending to his studies. They said he spent all his time drinking and womanizing, and dropped him from the PhD program. If he had at least showed up for classes wonst in while and made even the most nugatory effort, he would probably still be living in the U.S., probably in Massachusetts, near his brother and sister. Even though the purported purpose of the program he was enrolled in was to dip the future leaders of developing countries in the holy water fountains of the Ivy League, so they would have nice Ivy League accents when they came back to serve as parasites-in-residence on Turtle Bay.
An out-of-wedlock birth would not be worth the millions Obama has spent to keep from producing a valid birth certificate.
He admitted in the fake biography that details of the marriage, or if there was one, were murky.
Michelle called his mother “single” when he was born in one of her campaign appearances.
Simply does not work as a valid hypothesis. Most of his voters see out-of-wedlock birth as perfectly acceptable anyway.
Obama’s half brother living in squalor in Africa greatly resembles him. I don’t buy the not his read dad.
The Dad was already marrigr though. This makes the bigamist marriage a null. .
True, and that may have been why Stanley left the fathers name blank or “unknown”. To a promiscuous hippie like her, it might have been less embarrassing to be thought a slut than to have incorrectly “burdened” one of her lovers with fatherhood...
Agreed. From the lengths they have gone to cover it up, it must be something that raises doubts as to his eligibility.
Obummer does not resemble Obama Sr in the least ... he does resemble Frank Marshall Davis, and yes, Ann Dunham.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.