Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paleo Conservative

The birth dates of 01/01/01 or 01/01/00 leads me to belive this is a data entry problem, not voter fraud.


9 posted on 07/07/2012 3:28:46 PM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: stormer

Yeah. Any talk of voter fraud is just plain silly.


10 posted on 07/07/2012 3:39:46 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1263 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Heroes aren't made Frank, they're cornered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: stormer

Shades of the Duke of Duval County - George Paar - in the 1948 Senatorial election when Landslide Lyndon defeated Coke Stevenson, thanks to stuffed ballot boxes. If you have the opportunity, read the expose in “A Texan Looks at Lyndon,” written by the late J. Evetts Haley, history professor at (then) West Texas State University in Canyon, Texas.


11 posted on 07/07/2012 3:42:07 PM PDT by T Baden (Tenth Amendment Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: stormer
The birth dates of 01/01/01 or 01/01/00 leads me to belive this is a data entry problem, not voter fraud.

According to a Democrat I know, everyone who has re-registered after the 1996 election cycle and the implementation of motor voter, has had to supply a birth date. The date of 01/01/1901 is a place holder for birth dates that have not been updated. Actually that is problematic. About 1 in 6 registrations still are not associated with a birth date. As voters move their birthdates are added to the voter roll database.

14 posted on 07/07/2012 4:38:06 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson