Skip to comments.National Instruments Deeply Involved With Many LENR Projects (Briefed EU)
Posted on 07/08/2012 10:12:37 PM PDT by Kevmo
National Instruments Deeply Involved With Many LENR Projects (Briefed EU)
July 2, 2012
Thanks to E-Cat World reader un passante who sent the report of a talk given by Stefano Concezzi, director of National Instruments Science and Big Physics Segment. The talk was given at yet another meeting about LENR Towards a non-polluting energy revolution a meeting held today, July 2 in Rome, Italy.
A recording of the meetings proceedings is available (in Italian) here.
Heres the report thanks very much un passante! Italian seems to be an essential tool in the LENR world!
Concezzi gave a list of NI collaborations at the moment:
Kim (hope the spelling is right), Purdue University mathematical model software applications to be presented in august
Hagelstein, MIT mathematical model software applications (different theory)
Los alamos national lab
University of Missouri
University of Bologna, Levi he mentioned a sponsorship for a lab of the physics department. so here we go beyond a simple collaboration. he also spoke about Levi as the heir of Focardi (I guess this is also a way to keep in touch with Rossi)
INFN Frascati (Celani)
Texas University, Austin
Commissariat à lénergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)
Stanford Research Institute
Naval Research Laboratories
i.e. National Instruments is deeply involved with LENR research collaborating with chosen scientist and scientific organizations by giving them specific software support and instruments.
I say chosen because he mentioned that a process of choice was made for budgetary reasons.
He was cautious when expressing certanties about the phenomenon but he said (specifying it was his opinion) that he was optimist that both a working mathematical model for the phenomenon will be developed and that the experimental data showing excess heat are not measuring errors.
He also said that NI had the same presentation in front of the European Community ten days ago. (his exact words, he didnt specify further).
Hopefully an italian speaker with a better english than mine will give more and better details.
The message here seems to be that National Instruments is moving quickly to make a presence in the emerging field of LENR technology and while they are cautious about making a definitive assessment of the reality of cold fusion, they obviously see a tremendous commercial opportunity here, and they do not seem shy about announcing that they are ready and willing to work with this fledgling industry. As LENR projects expand there is going to be a need for the kinds of hardware and software systems that a company like NI provides, and it will heartening for researchers and companies to know that there is an experienced and serious company who they can work with for their instrumentation needs.
In addition to this, a new video of Dr. Rob Duncan of the University of Missouri has just been released on the National Instruments community web site. Duncans lecture is entitled The Mystery of Cold Fusion.
The Cold Fusion Ping List
Stefano Concezzi is the same guy who made the false claim that National Instruments was working with Rossi.
Stefano Concezzi, the director of National Instruments Science and Big Physics Segment, also revealed to Allan of PESN that National Instruments is indeed working together with Leonardo Corporation in the development of the much awaited E-Cat, the Web site reported.Link
Amazing! National Instruments is willing to sell its products and provide support for them.
That’s the new meaning of “DEEPLY INVOLVED”?
If there’s anything to LENR in general and E-CAT in particular, then why does ECAT need to hijack the brand of its data acquisition vendor to burnish its credentials? Why can’t it make it on its own merit?
The answer is obvious: it’s a FRAUD. This is the way a fraudulent scam behaves, not the way a legitimate enterprise operates.
I guess they think that “National Instruments” sounds impressive enough to people who have never purchased a data acquisuition board.
Are you arguing against LENR being a fraud, or just ECat? Your post just doesn’t make much sense.
Recall that the only proven fraud so far in LENR was from the “legitimate enterprise” known as MIT when they spiked their own positive results.
>> Recall that the only proven fraud so far in LENR was from the legitimate enterprise known as MIT
You forgot ECat — the most egregious of all LENR frauds.
My post makes perfect sense. It’s just that as an ECat and LENR sycophant, you pretend not to understand points made against the fraud you’re in the tank for. That’s not unusual, but it’s not good.
You forgot ECat the most egregious of all LENR frauds.
***ECat has not been proven to be a fraud.
>> ***ECat has not been proven to be a fraud.
Thanks! I got a hearty laugh out of THAT one!
Its just that as an ECat and LENR sycophant, you
***I’m a LENR fan. I was posting LENR articles here on FR before Rossi showed up, and I’ll be doing it after he’s gone, if he’s the fraud you claim he is.
Its just that as a... LENR sycophant, you
***As I stated, I’m a LENR fan. You, on the other hand, are an anti-science, anti-LENR Luddite.
Okie dokie. Everyone should have a hobby. Carry on.
>> You, on the other hand, are an anti-science, anti-LENR Luddite.
ROFLMAO! Oooh... thenthitive, aren’t we?
Science is cool. Never got into fantasy though. And I downright DESPISE lying and fraud.
Kevmo: ECat has not been proven to be a fraud.
Nervous: Thanks! I got a hearty laugh out of THAT one!
***I tell you what. Only because I like your tagline. If you’re so convinced it is a PROVEN fraud, then open a thread on FR and PROVE it. Otherwise, STFU and row from the rocks.
I know you will not open such a thread. How do I know? Because you cannot prove it. It’s nice to get a “hearty laugh”, but he who laughs last, laughs loudest.
So, it’s up to you: put up or shut up. Which will it be? I predict neither, due to a lack of character on your part.
And I downright DESPISE lying and fraud.
***Then prove fraud. Should be simple enough.
One question, to be answered on that thread you will open: If fraud is so obviously present (especially knowing Rossi’s questionable background), then why haven’t the authorities hauled him away to jail? But please answer this question on that thread you’re going to open that PROVES fraud.
I was told you are a piece of work; I see it’s true!
But like you said, “he who laffs last”...
Just like I predicted. You didn’t put up, nor shut up. You didn’t open the thread to PROVE fraud. Because you can’t.
Doesn’t it bother you that your lack of character makes you so utterly predictable? I haven’t been told that you are a piece of work, I only see your lack of character in this one simple thread.
>> You didnt open the thread to PROVE fraud. Because you cant.
Well, if an E-Cat unit actually *existed* apart from Rossi’s carefully guarded unit he uses for his fraudulent presentations — and said unit could be disassembled and examined, and used in independent experiments to confirm energy production (or not) — it would be rather easy to prove.
Maybe you could call up your buttbuddy Rossi and have one sent over for examination?
Just like I predicted... based on your lack of character. You don’t put up, nor do you shut up. That makes you worthless, kind of like what God had to say about Laodiceans.
O-kay. My bad. I sorry.
Can you please direct me to this "good science thread" you're talking about?
'cause this one ain't even a science thread, let alone a good one...
>> Just like I predicted... based on your lack of character. You dont put up, nor do you shut up. That makes you worthless, kind of like what God had to say about Laodiceans.
Deliver my E-Cat for examination! NOW! Put up or shut up! Or go away on the worthless dust beneath your low-character belly like the serpent that tempted Eve!
No proof of fraud delivered, I see. You do not put up nor do you shut up. As I pointed out, you have a lack of character.
Perhaps you would do well to take a critical thinking class, where you would learn that the horse laugh is another classic fallacy, among the many that you have employed in discussing LENR. But you won’t do that, either, due to your lack of character.
You are really a hoot, Kevmo! Thanks for the laffs. I’ve occasionally run across some fairly crazy folks here on FR, but I have to admit, you *absolutely* take the cake!
I feel kinda bad laughing at you because it’s likely you are ill and in need of treatment, but darn it, I just can’t help myself! ROFLMAO!
Yet another zeroed out learning curve demonstrated. When pointed out that the horse laugh is a logical fallacy, the Luddite anti-LENR Anti-Science poster resorts... yet again... to the horse laugh. No wonder he has a nervous tick.
Keep that up and he’ll demand you stop posting to him!