This is the game. The signs on the street say, “Don’t limit the right to marry”. The implications to the stupid or willfully uninformed are obvious.
“Last year, the Legislature approved the amendment for the ballot with the words recognition of marriage solely between one man and one woman. But Ritchie with Swansons approval last week changed the title to limiting the status of marriage to opposite-sex couples.
What a crafty sleight of hand this was! As stated in the article, they were not “limiting” anything; they were defending and upholding the normal and reasonable and centuries old definition. “Limiting” was thrown in there to confuse people, to make people feel guilty. Ugh. Advocacy, where is thy shame?