Skip to comments.Afghan Treachery and Visionless Strategy Continue to Kill American War Fighters!
Posted on 07/10/2012 2:57:04 PM PDT by CaptainKrunch
The Daily Mirror ran a story about the increased angst in the ranks of Britain's forces over new orders that require British forces to be fired upon before engaging the enemy in Afghanistan. While these ROE are not new to the US and ISAF forces in general, the edict is being received by Britain's armed forces as another oppressive act permitting a greater level of danger for them in the interest of safeguarding "innocent" Afghan civilians.
This debate is not new for either the Brits or Americans but with each new edict comes a new round of unnecessary friendly deaths at the hands of the Taliban and our new "allies", the Afghan Army and Police. As the numbers of ISAF and NATO casualties increase, there is ever growing evidence of the numbing of the minds of those entrusted with the leadership of these forces.
The reason the Taliban has been able to operate in such close proximity to our forces is the same reason we are finding so many incidences of treachery in the ranks of the ANA and ANP; the absence of scrutiny of the influence of the prevailing religion in the region and it's most hate filled verses. While the mantra from within the DC and emanating from the DOD is that Islam is a religion of peace which has been hijacked by a small percentage of adherents, the evidence suggests that the percentage is indeed higher. It is also indicative of a population that is not nearly as concerned with the actions of the Taliban as they are with our presence in their country.
Probably the most significant piece of evidence for this is in the proliferation of IED's. If in fact, as we are told, IED's are the product and weapon of an insurgent element that has perverted the doctrines of Islam, there should be very few of these devices left to injure our troops who are forced to patrol in and around populated areas without Close Air Support, Artillery Support, Support from organic weapons systems like 60mm, 81mm and 120mm mortars and who cannot return fire on an enemy if the engagement is near a populated area. But in reality, IED's are still being set and very few are being reported to ISAF or American forces by the population these unreasonably tight ROE are intended to protect. They are not being reported because the local population does not feel as oppressed by the Taliban as our leadership has chosen to believe. The Taliban are in fact, of the people in Afghanistan. They are Brothers, Fathers, Husbands, Sons, Neighbors and Friends. They also have one thing in common with the people that we, as a western force do not; a shared adherence to Islam.
I prefer to think of these rules of engagement as Kenyan/Indonesian treachery. The Afghans are not responsible for us allowing an anti-American socialist to take power in our country.
Obama considering sending Taliban detainees back to Afghanistan, hoping they won't wage jihad against U.S. again
from the Associated Press, June 29
The Obama administration is considering a new gambit to restart peace talks with the Taliban in Afghanistan that would send several Taliban detainees from the military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to a prison in Afghanistan, U.S. and Afghan officials told The Associated Press.
Under the proposal, some Taliban fighters or affiliates captured in the early days of the 2001 U.S. invasion of Afghanistan and later sent to Guantanamo under the label of enemy combatants would be transferred out of full U.S. control but not released. It's a leap of faith on the U.S. side that the men will not become threats to U.S. forces once back on Afghan soil. But it is meant to show more moderate elements of the Taliban insurgency that the U.S. is still interested in cutting a deal for peace....
AND then there is this:
May 7, 2012
The Washington Post reports that the Obama administration has for several years been secretly releasing high-level detainees from a military prison in Afghanistan as part of negotiations with insurgent groupsa program U.S. officials acknowledge poses substantial risks. The Post writes:
Ah, but nuttin' to see here; just move along...
and oh, BTW,--according to a handful of Freepers--"Mitt is MORE of a THREAT and more DANGEROUS than Dear Leader, donthca know....
...so, we might as well just all stay home come November /SARC!
Also note the reports that CENTCOM has completed the detailed planning sequence for operations in Syria and none other than John McCain is leading the charge on Capitol Hill to start operations. DC becomes detached from reality by the day.