Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan
With respect to the constitutionality of the individual mandate under the Commerce clause and the Necessary and Proper clause, Chief Justice Roberts suggested that because inactivity is not commerce, the individual mandate is unconstitutional. None (zero, zip, zilch, nada) of the other justices agreed with him. Therefore, Roberts did not deliver the opinion of the Court.

That's because none of the other justices (zero, zip, zilch, nada) discriminated between taxpayers and non-taxpayers.

Read, and learn: How Chief Justice Roberts Saved America

14 posted on 07/11/2012 12:54:20 AM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Talisker

I’ve read your analysis. It’s crap, IMHO.


15 posted on 07/11/2012 4:21:59 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson