Skip to comments.Federal documents show Romney tied to company that disposes of aborted babies
Posted on 07/11/2012 7:55:12 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
As presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney surged in fundraising after the Supreme Court’s decision on the Affordable Care Act, new questions have arisen about the candidates potential ties to a company known for its disposal of aborted fetuses.
Mother Jones reports the reality of Romney’s downplayed connection with Stericycle who provides what is, perhaps, one of the most despicable business services in our nation. A medical waste company, Stericycle is infamous for its willingness to go to various abortion centers and pick up the remains of aborted babies and dispose of them as medical waste. Federal documents from the Securities and Exchange Commission show the dates in which Romney reports being connected with his investment company don’t match up with the dates in which he was listed as being involved with a large investment in Stericycle, which leads us to ask if he was connected with Stericycle at times they were disposing of aborted fetuses.
Originally reported by the Huffington Post in January, Romney’s camp managed to avoid it as a campaign issue by insisting, as the news outlet reports:
“By the time Bain Capital [Romney’s investment firm] had made the investment in Stericycle, he had left the firm to run the 2002 Winter Olympic Games. He maintained ownership in Bain and kept holdings in its private equity funds, which included Stericycle stock, but he had no say in the managerial or strategic decisions at the firm, according to Bain officials.”
However, recent documents from the Securities and Exchange (SEC) Commission filed by Romney’s firm show that the timing wasn’t quite how Romney portrayed it. The document from November 22, 1999, reports, “W. Mitt Romney (“Mr. Romney”) is the sole stockholder, sole director, Chief Executive Officer, Managing Director and President of BCI VI Inc,” (SEC FORM SC 13D) in the Stericycle investment.
That means Romney was an active member of the firm when the $75 million investment was made in Stericycle. Stericylce isn’t just a medical waste business that is above board. As recently as last year, Stericylce was cited for improper disposal of fetuses in Texas. For a quick rundown of some news articles about Stericycle’s seedy history, click here. You will find a list of fines, truck leasing companies breaking contracts with them because of their fetus disposal business, and other serious controversies that the pro-life candidate must distance himself from by addressing these issues and either showing us proof there was no abortion activity back then or publicly addressing the wrongdoing and breaking his tie with them in keeping with his pro-life conversion, rather than simply misleading the American people about the dates he was there. It’s a concern if Romney actually was the “sole shareholder” as the SEC documents say, unquestionably say he was. You can read the filings from the SEC documents here and here. (Simply do a search within them for the name “Romney” and it will show you the relevant shareholder information.)
This information clearly contradicts what the Romney camp reported publicly in January. That is unacceptable and raises a serious issue for pro-lifers who have embraced him as a pro-life candidate.
There are too many unanswered questions to let this issue be a non-issue in this race. The man running on a pro-life platform actually was the “sole shareholder” in a company that made a $75 million investment in a company that has for an indeterminate amount of time profited directly from from the shedding of innocent blood. Their work helps polluted the land with bloodshed, putting fetuses in incinerators and waste areas. Stericycle is evasive in its responses to those who question its abortion business, claiming that abortion is only a “small portion” of its business, which is only true on a technicality. There are only a few hundred abortion centers in the nation and many more medical facilities that need waste services; however, Stericycle is the largest provider of disposing of fetal remains. Stop Stericycle.com reports:
Aside from the fact that we have recorded phone calls of Stericycle’s own representatives admitting that they accept fetal remains, many people are confused about Stericycle’s waste acceptance policy. The vaguely worded policy does not mention fetal remains, but rather craftily states that “complete human remains” are unacceptable. Stericycle has told the Campaign to Stop Stericycle (CSS) that it does not know when a fetus is considered to be human, and that the determination is up to the abortion mill and state law. Obviously, abortion mills never admit that aborted babies are human.
Additionally, during an undercover investigation, the Campaign to Stop Stericycle obtained a hypothetical contract for an abortion mill in which the pickup of fetal remains was included. CSS was also informed that the abortion mill would receive “incinerate only” stickers so that the fetal remains would be incinerated.
Furthermore, Stericycle is currently under government investigation in the state of Texas for illegally dumping aborted fetuses into a municipal landfill. During the initial investigation, Stericycle representatives told the government that “medical waste containing fetuses or tissue should be sent for incineration,” and that aborted fetuses in Texas should be transported to Stericycle’s plant in Apopka, Florida to be incinerated.
Because of such a clear controversy of pro-life issues, and the reports which show that the Romney’s investment firm ultimately profited $49.5 million from the Stericycle investment. There are two important questions we must address:
First, we do not have any evidence that the aborted fetal remains pick-ups began after Romney left the firm. Records like this are not easily available unless one knows what he is seeking exactly. StopStericycle.com has records from 2003, which is after Romney left, but until Stericycle or Romney can provide evidence that Stericycle’s suddenly started its business with fetuses after Romney sold his investment, we can’t conclusively be satisfied that was the case.
Second, Romney claims a pro-life conversion, though he does allows for exceptions in certain cases. He must address his relationship with the abortion profiteer. Even if some evidence exists showing perhaps it was after he sold his investment, Stericycle began this practice, Romney needs to address this to pro-lifers because he is running on a pro-life platform but is tied in some ways to a business linked to abortion since clearly the dates of his involvement were not as he reported.
We are a nation that endorses and sanctions the shedding of innocent blood, and we must draw a clear and bold line in the pro-life community that doesn’t allow for a blur that might have occurred in the name of business.
Romney cannot remain silent on this issue. After the inconsistencies about the dates, we know, it’s not enough to assume a conclusion that they didn’t pick up fetuses then.
According to Stericycle, “We became a publicly traded company in 1996, and emerged as North America’s largest provider of medical waste services in 2000.
So when did fetus pick up begin? How does the now pro-life Romney address this? The lines blur too much, and while we hope that some evidence may exist to show that Stericycle did not get involved in the abortion industry until after Romney left, we have not seen that. We’d like to.Bound4LIFE is still pursuing information on this story and searching for documents and updates; we will bring you updates as we have them.
I put the blame on mothers who don’t want to be punished with a baby. If they hadn’t have allowed someone to murder their children, there would be no need to “dispose” of these babies.
Based on a Mother Jones report? Are you freaking serious? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Certainly you don’t think they’re the only ones who are culpable?
His opponent is an enthusiastic supporter of the creation of aborted babies.
Ok, so don’t vote for Romney.
Choose Obama because he is the more pro-life candidate, right?
Mother Jones' motivations on this are obvious.
Based on a Mother Jones report? Are you freaking serious? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA If this is possibly true, could his tie be an mutual fund or investment that is a package of stocks or part of some investment group. I doubt if anyone in politics, even the leftist idiots would knowingly invest in a company like that. Even to leftist constituents, fetus disposal is gruesome.
Lifesite news has already debunked this.
Wasn’t Romney pro-choice back in the day? This was 13 years ago...just sayin...
its a good thing Obama never supported anything like this...
its a good thing Obama never supported anything like this...
Poor Romney..just gets pushed around so much...has no control over his abortion stocks. And the MA legislature supporting gay marriage had complete control there as well! Poor Mittens! He had nothing to do with it! Just leave him alone!
Not the only ones but certainly the most responsible. Who do you blame?
Mother Jones and HuffPo? No thanks. I’d rather give myself a vasectomy.
Not this @#$ again. Been through this once already, just the other day.
And the point IS?
You would rather have a guy who is the Abortion King as president?
So, just what should be done with aborted fetuses...flush them Dow a toilet somewhere? It’s a MEDICAL WASTE company, they dispose of all kinds of medical waste, from used syringes to amputated limbs.
Mother Jones reports—————
I stopped there.
Mother Jones is more reliable.
His offshore accounts which is over most people's head.
He had to setup overseas accounts to be paid from foreign investors who do not want to pay US taxes so they paid Bain in overseas accounts that all Hedge Funds do.
“Dow” should be “down”...typing on my IPad.
No. Based on SEC documents.
I've seen them. Have you?
Mittbots don’t concern themselves with right and wrong. That takes moral courage and they have none.
Too bad. You should read the documents the story is based on.
There's no doubt about Romney's involvement.
"On all three bills, Obama voted "present," effectively the same as a "no." Defining "a pre-viable fetus" that survived an abortion as a "person" or "child," he argued, "would essentially bar abortions, because the Equal Protection Clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an anti-abortion statute."
In 2002, Obama voted "no" on the bill.
Wow, you actually said "could not care less" instead of "could care less"......that's awesome........THANK YOU! :)
That about says it all...super left wing rag, slinging mud. It will only get worse as Obama sees defeat on the horizon.
mitt’s soul will be damned if he does not give up his science fiction cult and stop embracing the work of satan. I am one PRO LIFE man that will not remain silent.
If honest folks want to understand the dangers posed by Romney Republicanism, all they have to do is watch the spin intended to justify this indefensible bit of history.
As dangerous as Obama is, a “conservative” movement that has abandoned all principle, and has begun to justify evil, is much more of a threat to the survival of this free republic.
I've dug my way through, and assuming the claims are correct, Mitt made a lot of money on dead babies.
Typical of GOP-e to force the nomination of someone like that. Wonder what some of them made on this deal.
Maybe I’m missing something or I’m not the purist that some are on this thread.
Does investing in a company that disposes of fetus’ support or encourage abortions? Granted Stericycle is not exactly the type of company or business model that I would actively search out but are they not performing a service demanded by a marketplace? Medical waste disposal is kinda specialized and someone’s gotta do it. Surely the pro-life preference is not toilet flushing or dark-of-nite deposits in Wastemanagement or Violia dumpsters.
So why should I care if Romney’s firm invested in them?
What is your purpose in posting this article?
ANYONE but Obama.
Provide a source for your assertion. I went to the website of the organization that's been bird dogging this company for quite some time and they seem to have their ducks in a line.
The Left would not have had the opening if the SEC documents didn’t show without a doubt that Romney profited to the tune of at least $50 million dollars from the killing of little boys and girls.
Blowing it off because a leftwing source broke the story wide open is not very honest.
The left is reveling in exposing the hypocrisy of Romney Republicans who claim to be pro-life.
Please dont let facts get in the way here
Is that mistake so rampant? :)
Thank you for actually showing some vigilance in research, unlike the guy who just thinks it makes for a cool name.
I had a friend who bought a liquor store. He was looking at cash flow ~ and next thing you know a crazy guy in the building set fire to his store on the first floor first.
Do you know how fast liquor stores burn? Can you imagine how many years it takes for any insurance company to pay the first claim when there's been an arson?
He finally got his money back after the arrest and conviction of the crazy guy.
At the time he bought that store I told him that liquor stores are going to exist but why did he need to be one of the owners?
He never had a good answer, and after all the trouble he had with that one he never bought another one!
Fulfilling the mission statement of FreeRepublic.com.
Ever read it? It's on the homepage.
"As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc."
To help make sure Romney loses the election.
Agonizingly so! Along with the use of ‘irregardless’.
I’m running, for one.
I’m the author of this:
You’re tied to an entire country that disposes of aborted babies...so what was your point again?
Basic human decency.
In his own words.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.