Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal documents show Romney tied to company that disposes of aborted babies
bound4life ^ | July 6, 2012 | Susan Michelle Tyrrell

Posted on 07/11/2012 7:55:12 AM PDT by EternalVigilance

As presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney surged in fundraising after the Supreme Court’s decision on the Affordable Care Act, new questions have arisen about the candidates potential ties to a company known for its disposal of aborted fetuses.

Mother Jones reports the reality of Romney’s downplayed connection with Stericycle who provides what is, perhaps, one of the most despicable business services in our nation. A medical waste company, Stericycle is infamous for its willingness to go to various abortion centers and pick up the remains of aborted babies and dispose of them as medical waste. Federal documents from the Securities and Exchange Commission show the dates in which Romney reports being connected with his investment company don’t match up with the dates in which he was listed as being involved with a large investment in Stericycle, which leads us to ask if he was connected with Stericycle at times they were disposing of aborted fetuses.

Originally reported by the Huffington Post in January, Romney’s camp managed to avoid it as a campaign issue by insisting, as the news outlet reports:

“By the time Bain Capital [Romney’s investment firm] had made the investment in Stericycle, he had left the firm to run the 2002 Winter Olympic Games. He maintained ownership in Bain and kept holdings in its private equity funds, which included Stericycle stock, but he had no say in the managerial or strategic decisions at the firm, according to Bain officials.”

However, recent documents from the Securities and Exchange (SEC) Commission filed by Romney’s firm show that the timing wasn’t quite how Romney portrayed it. The document from November 22, 1999, reports, “W. Mitt Romney (“Mr. Romney”) is the sole stockholder, sole director, Chief Executive Officer, Managing Director and President of BCI VI Inc,” (SEC FORM SC 13D) in the Stericycle investment.

That means Romney was an active member of the firm when the $75 million investment was made in Stericycle. Stericylce isn’t just a medical waste business that is above board.  As recently as last year, Stericylce was cited for improper disposal of fetuses in Texas. For a quick rundown of some news articles about Stericycle’s seedy history, click here. You will find a list of fines, truck leasing companies breaking contracts with them because of their fetus disposal business, and other serious controversies that the pro-life candidate must distance himself from by addressing these issues and either showing us proof there was no abortion activity back then or publicly addressing the wrongdoing and breaking his tie with them in keeping with his pro-life conversion, rather than simply misleading the American people about the dates he was there. It’s a concern if Romney actually was the “sole shareholder” as the SEC documents say, unquestionably say he was.  You can read the filings from the SEC documents here and here. (Simply do a search within them for the name “Romney” and it will show you the relevant shareholder information.)

This information clearly contradicts what the Romney camp reported publicly in January. That is unacceptable and raises a serious issue for pro-lifers who have embraced him as a pro-life candidate.

There are too many unanswered questions to let this issue be a non-issue in this race. The man running on a pro-life platform actually was the “sole shareholder” in a company that made a $75 million investment in a company that has for an indeterminate amount of time profited directly from from the shedding of innocent blood. Their work helps polluted the land with bloodshed, putting fetuses in incinerators and waste areas. Stericycle is evasive in its responses to those who question its abortion business, claiming that abortion is only a “small portion” of its business, which is only true on a technicality. There are only a few hundred abortion centers in the nation and many more medical facilities that need waste services; however, Stericycle is the largest provider of disposing of fetal remains.  Stop Stericycle.com reports:

Aside from the fact that we have recorded phone calls of Stericycle’s own representatives admitting that they accept fetal remains, many people are confused about Stericycle’s waste acceptance policy. The vaguely worded policy does not mention fetal remains, but rather craftily states that “complete human remains” are unacceptable. Stericycle has told the Campaign to Stop Stericycle (CSS) that it does not know when a fetus is considered to be human, and that the determination is up to the abortion mill and state law. Obviously, abortion mills never admit that aborted babies are human.

Additionally, during an undercover investigation, the Campaign to Stop Stericycle obtained a hypothetical contract for an abortion mill in which the pickup of fetal remains was included. CSS was also informed that the abortion mill would receive “incinerate only” stickers so that the fetal remains would be incinerated.

Furthermore, Stericycle is currently under government investigation in the state of Texas for illegally dumping aborted fetuses into a municipal landfill. During the initial investigation, Stericycle representatives told the government that “medical waste containing fetuses or tissue should be sent for incineration,” and that aborted fetuses in Texas should be transported to Stericycle’s plant in Apopka, Florida to be incinerated.

Because of such a clear controversy of pro-life issues, and the reports which show that the Romney’s investment firm ultimately profited $49.5 million from the Stericycle investment. There are two important questions we must address:

First, we do not have any evidence that the aborted fetal remains pick-ups began after Romney left the firm. Records like this are not easily available unless one knows what he is seeking exactly. StopStericycle.com has records from 2003, which is after Romney left, but until Stericycle or Romney can provide evidence that Stericycle’s suddenly started its business with fetuses after Romney sold his investment, we can’t conclusively be satisfied that was the case.

Second, Romney claims a pro-life conversion, though he does allows for exceptions in certain cases. He must address his relationship with the abortion profiteer. Even if some evidence exists showing perhaps it was after he sold his investment, Stericycle began this practice, Romney needs to address this to pro-lifers because he is running on a pro-life platform but is tied in some ways to a business linked to abortion since clearly the dates of his involvement were not as he reported.

 We are a nation that endorses and sanctions the shedding of innocent blood, and we must draw a clear and bold line in the pro-life community that doesn’t allow for a blur that might have occurred in the name of business.

Romney cannot remain silent on this issue. After the inconsistencies about the dates, we know, it’s not enough to assume a conclusion that they didn’t pick up fetuses then.

According to Stericycle, “We became a publicly traded company in 1996, and emerged as North America’s largest provider of medical waste services in 2000.

So when did fetus pick up begin? How does the now pro-life Romney address this? The lines blur too much, and while we hope that some evidence may exist to show that Stericycle did not get involved in the abortion industry until after Romney left, we have not seen that. We’d like to.Bound4LIFE is still pursuing information on this story and searching for documents and updates; we will bring you updates as we have them.

 


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News
KEYWORDS: abortedbabies; blogwhore; ghouls; huffpost; liberalrags; libsdivideandconquer; medicalwaste; motherjones; romney; romneyattack; romneyhitpiece; stericycle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-209 next last
The silence from most pro-lifers on this story is deafening...and telling.
1 posted on 07/11/2012 7:55:21 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I put the blame on mothers who don’t want to be punished with a baby. If they hadn’t have allowed someone to murder their children, there would be no need to “dispose” of these babies.


2 posted on 07/11/2012 7:57:50 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk; wagglebee; Jim Robinson; Tau Food; Finny; joanie-f; Gelato; Steve Schulin

Ping ...


3 posted on 07/11/2012 7:57:54 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (If you've surrendered your principles out of fear of Obama you've already lost. TomHoefling.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Based on a Mother Jones report? Are you freaking serious? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


4 posted on 07/11/2012 7:58:05 AM PDT by TheRhinelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Certainly you don’t think they’re the only ones who are culpable?


5 posted on 07/11/2012 7:59:56 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (If you've surrendered your principles out of fear of Obama you've already lost. TomHoefling.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Big deal.

His opponent is an enthusiastic supporter of the creation of aborted babies.


6 posted on 07/11/2012 8:00:39 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Ok, so don’t vote for Romney.

Choose Obama because he is the more pro-life candidate, right?


7 posted on 07/11/2012 8:01:47 AM PDT by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander
Exactly. Mother Jones publishing an anti-Romney hit piece intended to appeal to conservatives, that actually has more questions than real facts, and some people apparently are taking the bait.

Mother Jones' motivations on this are obvious.

8 posted on 07/11/2012 8:02:37 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
And Mother Jones and HuffPo are whining large crocodile tears. When Obama declared that he is in favor of murdering babies that survived botched abortions, however, they could not care less. I guess you have to be a liberal to understand this sort of “advanced dialectics”…
9 posted on 07/11/2012 8:02:51 AM PDT by cartan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander

Based on a Mother Jones report? Are you freaking serious? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA If this is possibly true, could his tie be an mutual fund or investment that is a package of stocks or part of some investment group. I doubt if anyone in politics, even the leftist idiots would knowingly invest in a company like that. Even to leftist constituents, fetus disposal is gruesome.


10 posted on 07/11/2012 8:05:38 AM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Lifesite news has already debunked this.


11 posted on 07/11/2012 8:06:55 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Wasn’t Romney pro-choice back in the day? This was 13 years ago...just sayin...


12 posted on 07/11/2012 8:07:23 AM PDT by BreezyDog (PLAN A: A Peaceful Restoration of the Republic.....PLAN B: A Restoration of the Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

oh no....

its a good thing Obama never supported anything like this...

oh wait


13 posted on 07/11/2012 8:08:54 AM PDT by Mr. K (OBAMA MUST BE STOPPED ROMNEY/GINGRICH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

oh no....

its a good thing Obama never supported anything like this...

oh wait


14 posted on 07/11/2012 8:09:13 AM PDT by Mr. K (OBAMA MUST BE STOPPED ROMNEY/GINGRICH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Poor Romney..just gets pushed around so much...has no control over his abortion stocks. And the MA legislature supporting gay marriage had complete control there as well! Poor Mittens! He had nothing to do with it! Just leave him alone!


15 posted on 07/11/2012 8:09:36 AM PDT by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Not the only ones but certainly the most responsible. Who do you blame?


16 posted on 07/11/2012 8:11:32 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Mother Jones and HuffPo? No thanks. I’d rather give myself a vasectomy.


17 posted on 07/11/2012 8:11:32 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Congrats to Ted Kennedy! He's been sober for two years now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Not this @#$ again. Been through this once already, just the other day.


18 posted on 07/11/2012 8:12:07 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

And the point IS?

You would rather have a guy who is the Abortion King as president?

PERSPECTIVE!!!!!!


19 posted on 07/11/2012 8:13:27 AM PDT by ZULU (See: http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=D9vQt6IXXaM&hd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

So, just what should be done with aborted fetuses...flush them Dow a toilet somewhere? It’s a MEDICAL WASTE company, they dispose of all kinds of medical waste, from used syringes to amputated limbs.


20 posted on 07/11/2012 8:14:44 AM PDT by FrankR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

new questions

Mother Jones reports—————

I stopped there.


21 posted on 07/11/2012 8:14:59 AM PDT by Freddd (No PA Engineers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Lifesite news has already debunked this.

Mother Jones is more reliable.

22 posted on 07/11/2012 8:15:12 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (If you've surrendered your principles out of fear of Obama you've already lost. TomHoefling.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller
Mother Jones and HP honest reporting?

His offshore accounts which is over most people's head.

He had to setup overseas accounts to be paid from foreign investors who do not want to pay US taxes so they paid Bain in overseas accounts that all Hedge Funds do.

23 posted on 07/11/2012 8:15:17 AM PDT by scooby321 (h tones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

“Dow” should be “down”...typing on my IPad.


24 posted on 07/11/2012 8:16:16 AM PDT by FrankR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander
Based on a Mother Jones report? Are you freaking serious? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

No. Based on SEC documents.

I've seen them. Have you?

25 posted on 07/11/2012 8:16:35 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (If you've surrendered your principles out of fear of Obama you've already lost. TomHoefling.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Mittbots don’t concern themselves with right and wrong. That takes moral courage and they have none.


26 posted on 07/11/2012 8:17:55 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freddd
I stopped there.

Too bad. You should read the documents the story is based on.

There's no doubt about Romney's involvement.

27 posted on 07/11/2012 8:18:05 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (If you've surrendered your principles out of fear of Obama you've already lost. TomHoefling.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Obama: Born Alive Act

"On all three bills, Obama voted "present," effectively the same as a "no." Defining "a pre-viable fetus" that survived an abortion as a "person" or "child," he argued, "would essentially bar abortions, because the Equal Protection Clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an anti-abortion statute."

In 2002, Obama voted "no" on the bill.

http://www.humanevents.com/2008/01/16/more-on-obama-and-babies-born-alive/

28 posted on 07/11/2012 8:19:51 AM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cartan
When Obama declared that he is in favor of murdering babies that survived botched abortions, however, they could not care less.

Wow, you actually said "could not care less" instead of "could care less"......that's awesome........THANK YOU! :)

29 posted on 07/11/2012 8:20:20 AM PDT by Badabing Badablonde (New to the internet? CLICK HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Mother Jones reports

That about says it all...super left wing rag, slinging mud. It will only get worse as Obama sees defeat on the horizon.

30 posted on 07/11/2012 8:20:20 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

mitt’s soul will be damned if he does not give up his science fiction cult and stop embracing the work of satan. I am one PRO LIFE man that will not remain silent.

LLS


31 posted on 07/11/2012 8:20:20 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

That’s right.

If honest folks want to understand the dangers posed by Romney Republicanism, all they have to do is watch the spin intended to justify this indefensible bit of history.

As dangerous as Obama is, a “conservative” movement that has abandoned all principle, and has begun to justify evil, is much more of a threat to the survival of this free republic.


32 posted on 07/11/2012 8:21:08 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (If you've surrendered your principles out of fear of Obama you've already lost. TomHoefling.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
The problem with the story is it isn't put together all that well. It's got factoids but it needs coherence.

I've dug my way through, and assuming the claims are correct, Mitt made a lot of money on dead babies.

Typical of GOP-e to force the nomination of someone like that. Wonder what some of them made on this deal.

33 posted on 07/11/2012 8:22:10 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Maybe I’m missing something or I’m not the purist that some are on this thread.
Does investing in a company that disposes of fetus’ support or encourage abortions? Granted Stericycle is not exactly the type of company or business model that I would actively search out but are they not performing a service demanded by a marketplace? Medical waste disposal is kinda specialized and someone’s gotta do it. Surely the pro-life preference is not toilet flushing or dark-of-nite deposits in Wastemanagement or Violia dumpsters.

So why should I care if Romney’s firm invested in them?


34 posted on 07/11/2012 8:22:22 AM PDT by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

What is your purpose in posting this article?


35 posted on 07/11/2012 8:22:30 AM PDT by ardara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

ANYONE but Obama.


36 posted on 07/11/2012 8:23:43 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
They have?

Provide a source for your assertion. I went to the website of the organization that's been bird dogging this company for quite some time and they seem to have their ducks in a line.

37 posted on 07/11/2012 8:24:17 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

The Left would not have had the opening if the SEC documents didn’t show without a doubt that Romney profited to the tune of at least $50 million dollars from the killing of little boys and girls.

Blowing it off because a leftwing source broke the story wide open is not very honest.

The left is reveling in exposing the hypocrisy of Romney Republicans who claim to be pro-life.


38 posted on 07/11/2012 8:24:58 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (If you've surrendered your principles out of fear of Obama you've already lost. TomHoefling.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Please dont let facts get in the way here


39 posted on 07/11/2012 8:25:32 AM PDT by italianquaker ( Mr Obama inherited an AAA rating and made it AA, thnx Resident Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Badabing Badablonde

Is that mistake so rampant? :)


40 posted on 07/11/2012 8:26:08 AM PDT by cartan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cartan

Thank you for actually showing some vigilance in research, unlike the guy who just thinks it makes for a cool name.


41 posted on 07/11/2012 8:26:08 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Well since neither Obama nor Romney are pure enough on this issue, which possible candidate would be 100% untainted by these unseemly facts and/or innuendo? Who would be this masked caped crusader? Underdog?
42 posted on 07/11/2012 8:26:32 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
No one forces them to pick up dead babies.

I had a friend who bought a liquor store. He was looking at cash flow ~ and next thing you know a crazy guy in the building set fire to his store on the first floor first.

Do you know how fast liquor stores burn? Can you imagine how many years it takes for any insurance company to pay the first claim when there's been an arson?

He finally got his money back after the arrest and conviction of the crazy guy.

At the time he bought that store I told him that liquor stores are going to exist but why did he need to be one of the owners?

He never had a good answer, and after all the trouble he had with that one he never bought another one!

43 posted on 07/11/2012 8:28:07 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ardara
What is your purpose in posting this article?

Fulfilling the mission statement of FreeRepublic.com.

Ever read it? It's on the homepage.

"As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc."

44 posted on 07/11/2012 8:28:49 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (If you've surrendered your principles out of fear of Obama you've already lost. TomHoefling.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ardara
What is your purpose in posting this article?

To help make sure Romney loses the election.

45 posted on 07/11/2012 8:29:38 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Congrats to Ted Kennedy! He's been sober for two years now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: cartan

Agonizingly so! Along with the use of ‘irregardless’.


46 posted on 07/11/2012 8:30:06 AM PDT by Badabing Badablonde (New to the internet? CLICK HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

I’m running, for one.

http://www.tomhoefling.com/

I’m the author of this:

http://www.equalprotectionforposterity.com/the-equal-protection-for-posterity-resolution.html


47 posted on 07/11/2012 8:31:13 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (If you've surrendered your principles out of fear of Obama you've already lost. TomHoefling.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

You’re tied to an entire country that disposes of aborted babies...so what was your point again?


48 posted on 07/11/2012 8:33:40 AM PDT by lewislynn ( What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in commom? Misinformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bossmechanic
So why should I care if Romney’s firm invested in them?

Basic human decency.

49 posted on 07/11/2012 8:34:49 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (If you've surrendered your principles out of fear of Obama you've already lost. TomHoefling.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_w9pquznG4

In his own words.

LLS


50 posted on 07/11/2012 8:35:25 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson