Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Residents of Wrentham public housing complex ordered to remove U.S. flags
Attleboro MA Sun Chronicle ^ | 7/11/12 | Matt Kakley

Posted on 07/12/2012 8:33:50 AM PDT by raccoonradio

WRENTHAM — Just a week after the nation celebrated its birthday, residents of the Garden Lane public housing complex are being told they can no longer display their patriotism by hanging U.S. flags outside their homes.

Tenants of the complex, operated near the center of town by the Wrentham Housing Authority, were notified of the new policy through a letter taped to their doors sometime Wednesday afternoon.

The letter, which is unsigned but is on housing authority letterhead, says the move was made after a tenant repeatedly complained to the state Department of Housing and Community Development over the July 4th holiday.

“(The) Wrentham Housing Authority has been informed that the public display of the American flag in common areas is not permitted,” it said.

The letter goes on to say that flags can still be displayed inside tenants’ apartments, just not outside.

“Flags may be visible through the apartment windows, but may not be displayed on the exterior of the buildings or on the ground around the buildings,” it said.

There is no explanation given for the rule, other than the complaints of a tenant. Housing Authority Executive Director Nancy Siegel was not available Wednesday afternoon for comment.

A call to a spokeswoman for the Executive Office of Housing and Community Development was not returned Wednesday.

Ironically, flag-holding hardware is affixed to doors throughout the complex.

The issue in Wrentham is similar to one that developed last year at Gardner Terrace, a privately owned, but government subsidized affordable housing complex in Attleboro.

There, tenants were forbidden from putting any decorations, including flags, on their doors after a resident posted an Irish slur.

Whatever the reasoning for the rule, it quickly rankled residents of the Wrentham housing, including Barbara Marshall, the only tenant to have a flag hung up outside her home Wednesday afternoon.

Marshall, 82, called the policy “unbelievable,” and said she’s proudly hung a flag outside her apartment for more than a dozen years.

“I’ve always had a flag,” she said. “I’m very upset.”

At times speaking through tears, Marshall said veterans have played an important role in her family’s history, from her brother landing in Normandy D-Day invasion during World War II, to her work in shelters, to her grandson clearing graves in Plainville.

“All my family is so indebted to the veterans, to that flag,” she said.

Upon reading the letter, Marshall, who is recovering from surgery, said she had to lie down because she was so upset.

She said she will not remove the flag herself and will document any other attempts to discard it.

“If somebody wants to come and take the flag down, I’ll take pictures,” she said.

Marshall said she intends to call U.S. Sen. Scott Brown, a Wrentham resident, to see if his office can help change the policy.

“Somebody’s got to help,” she said.

For now, though, Marshall said she’ll continue to hang her flag proudly despite what the letter, which also contains regulations for gardening, says.

“I don’t care about the gardening, but don’t take my flag,” she said.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: ban; firstamendment; flag; freespeech; freespeechnazis; publichousing; wrentham
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
This ain't no rag it's a flag
1 posted on 07/12/2012 8:34:00 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
Upon reading the letter, Marshall, who is recovering from surgery, said she had to lie down because she was so upset.


Easily my favorite part.
2 posted on 07/12/2012 8:36:13 AM PDT by OnlyTurkeysHaveLeftWings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

One person complained. Hey, if I complain to Congress about funding of NPR, will they obey me, even though it’s just one person? Why not?

Sen. Scott Brown lives in Wrentham...I’m sure he’ll say “c’mon gimme a break” when he hears this.


3 posted on 07/12/2012 8:36:57 AM PDT by raccoonradio (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

4 posted on 07/12/2012 8:37:46 AM PDT by MarineBrat (Better dead than red!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OnlyTurkeysHaveLeftWings

If burning a flag is free speech, isn’t flying a flag also free speech?


5 posted on 07/12/2012 8:37:46 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup (Common sense although common knowledge is seldom common practice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OnlyTurkeysHaveLeftWings

Note that this singles out American Flags on the 4th of July. Please feel free to fly the Daily Planet Flag during World Cup.


6 posted on 07/12/2012 8:38:26 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

Let’s have a little experiment. They should all fly the gay rainbow flags instead and see if they get the same response. If not then sue their butts—pun intended.


7 posted on 07/12/2012 8:40:03 AM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

good point

and to use the oft-quoted bit (I’ll use a slightly amended version from talk host Pat Whitley (added words in
parentheses):
It is the soldier, not the reporter who has given us freedom of the press.
It is the soldier, not the poet, who has given us the freedom of speech.
It is the soldier, not the campus organizer, who has given us the freedom to demonstrate.
It is the soldier, not the lawyer, who has given us the right to a fair trial.
It is the soldier who salutes the flag, who serves under the flag and whose coffin is draped by the flag who allows the protester (the freedom he abuses) to burn the flag.


8 posted on 07/12/2012 8:42:41 AM PDT by raccoonradio (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio; Andonius_99; Andy'smom; Antique Gal; Big Guy and Rusty 99; bitt; Barset; ...

Howie Carr list ping. People’s Republic of Wrentham


9 posted on 07/12/2012 8:44:55 AM PDT by raccoonradio (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup; raccoonradio; massgopguy

Eh? I just enjoyed the idea of someone being so upset they have to lie down. Not even my grandma’s like that and she’s Irish.


10 posted on 07/12/2012 8:52:11 AM PDT by OnlyTurkeysHaveLeftWings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

The letter, which is unsigned but is on housing authority letterhead, says the move was made after a tenant repeatedly complained to the state Department of Housing and Community Development over the July 4th holiday.


Tyranny of the minority. Get used to it.

“Flags may be visible through the apartment windows, but may not be displayed on the exterior of the buildings or on the ground around the buildings,” it said.


Don’t expect that to last long, because surely the complainers eyes will still be offended.


11 posted on 07/12/2012 8:58:25 AM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
a tenant repeatedly complained to the state Department of Housing and Community Development over the July 4th holiday.

WHO?

12 posted on 07/12/2012 9:00:55 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

What if a tenant complains about the lack of a flag?


13 posted on 07/12/2012 9:04:29 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

There was a recent study that suggested the sight of American Flags induces people to think conservatively, and act conservatively in the voting booth.

The Leftists know this.


14 posted on 07/12/2012 9:07:09 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
The letter, which is unsigned but is on housing authority letterhead, says the move was made after a tenant repeatedly complained to the state Department of Housing and Community Development over the July 4th holiday.

Some very confused math at work here.

A single individual is upset so we are going to upset dozens so that this individual can be at peace.

Only an agent of government could calculate so poorly.

15 posted on 07/12/2012 9:11:08 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
Tenants of the complex, operated near the center of town by the Wrentham Housing Authority, were notified of the new policy through a letter taped to their doors sometime Wednesday afternoon.

the move was made after a tenant repeatedly complained to the state Department of Housing and Community Development over the July 4th holiday.

So here we have a person living in public housing; housing that is at least subsidized by government funds.

So this tenant while living in his/her apartment by the grace of charity of the tax paying citizens of the united states can not bare to look upon the flag which represents the people upon whose charity he or she depends.

This ungrateful wretch should be asked to seek other accommodations.

16 posted on 07/12/2012 9:17:23 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Make everyone fly one and call it a “tax”.


17 posted on 07/12/2012 9:26:11 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

Apparently someone came to their senses:

http://www.myfoxboston.com/story/19009901/state-housing-authority-flag-display-ban-a-mistake

I would hav ethought thare was some kind of lease, even for public housing, and adding a rule that was not part of the original agreement might have offered some legal recourse for the tenants. It appears a few thousand calls/emails were more efficient than any legal recourse.


18 posted on 07/12/2012 9:30:28 AM PDT by Gil4 (Sometimes it's not low self-esteem - it's just accurate self-assessment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

I’d start flying the Stars and Bars.


19 posted on 07/12/2012 9:30:33 AM PDT by arderkrag (ABOs are Romneybot trolls. LOOKING FOR ROLEPLAYERS. Check Profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

“What if a tenant complains about the lack of a flag?”

What if ALL the tenants complained about the lack of a flag, and repeatedly called the Housing Authority.

Wouldn’t that trump the lone caller?

If that won’t work, then it’s time for a blanket party.


20 posted on 07/12/2012 9:31:48 AM PDT by READINABLUESTATE ("We must hang together, gentlemen...else, we shall most assuredly hang separately." - Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson