Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon Develops Easy Capture Nano-second Electrical Pulse Stun Gun
gadizmo.com ^ | 12 July, 2012 | R.J. Huneke

Posted on 07/12/2012 2:58:30 PM PDT by marktwain

Get fired upon and instantaneously be rendered unconscious by the Department of Defense’s newest non-lethal, but beefed up, stun gun.

This Nano-second Electrical Pulse Stun Gun (nsEP) is one of several projects that the Department of Defense showcased on June 22 at the Non-Lethal Weapons Industry Day in Quantico, Virginia.

It is in the early prototype stages, per the Pentagon’s PDF, and the nsEP gun is currently being tested on animals (ouch) to see if it will be safe for human utilization. They say the Nanosecond Electrical Pulses (nsEP) have the potential to cause a non-lethal disabling effect, and that the electrical parameters bring about durations of hundreds of nanosecond and peak potentials of tens of kilovolts under load.

What this means is that the government enforcement agent carrying one of these stun gun whoppers will be able to direct hundreds of volts of more powerful electricity than your standard stunner at a human being for fractions of a second so that they are incapacitated but not permanently damaged (as Darth Vader would say).

The Pentagon has plenty of lethal weapons on file, so they are now looking into the non-lethal variety. The new pulse gun is a lightweight device supposed to be an improvement over the existing — and often limited — stun guns, says Defense News.

Forget the current stunners (that have run rampant in the attack on Occupy Wall Street camps), because those allow the victim to recover as soon as the electricity stops zapping. The nsEP stun gun will render that enemy (activist?) unconscious for several minutes, making detainment far easier than it is right now. Having worked with high voltage electricity before, this sounds like it hurts (but I could be wrong).

The evolution of weapons never ceases to amaze.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; electric; pentagon; stungun; zzzaplist
Non-lethal devices give people more options. I wonder when this super tazer will be available to people outside of the military.
1 posted on 07/12/2012 2:58:41 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Non-lethal until it isn’t.


2 posted on 07/12/2012 3:01:20 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Aye, Kiptin, it was set on stun! I swear it!


3 posted on 07/12/2012 3:05:57 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Electroshock therapy for the masses...


4 posted on 07/12/2012 3:07:00 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1268 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Heroes aren't made Frank, they're cornered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Hmmmm... This could become the Home invasion weapon of choice. Both by the police and the ‘professionals’ in the trade.


5 posted on 07/12/2012 3:09:21 PM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

It’s a kidnappers dream.


6 posted on 07/12/2012 3:10:55 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Sounds like a small high voltage capacitor charged up by a voltage multiplier circuit and then discharged into the subject (victim)

Not sure how quickly a cap like that would discharge since there is a lot of resistance on the surface of the skin. Across a dead short the pulse would be very short.

Perhaps they overcome the skin resistance by using small barbed needles like some stun guns do. Or perhaps small projectiles that are tipped with a carbon doped sticky substance.

The only way to induce momentary unconsciousness is for the discharged pulse to be across the head. It need not be from temple to temple, it just needs to be an inch or more apart.
ECT is most often administered only on one side of the head and not across the head as in the old days. It’s well known that a single strong short duration pulse to the head from a ECT machine results in momentary loss of consciousness and memory disruption.

There was a case years back where a stupid intern discharged a defibrillator across his head. He was knocked out for a moment but recovered fully. (how embarrassing)


7 posted on 07/12/2012 3:14:35 PM PDT by Bobalu (It is not obama we are fighting, it is the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

What’s the standoff range? Or did I miss it?

Mr. Beretta has a respectable standoff range. He’s lethal, granted.


8 posted on 07/12/2012 3:16:25 PM PDT by tgusa (gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger .......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast

lol

“instantaneously be rendered unconscious”

Shoot, that nearly happens to me every time Obamugabe comes on TV and starts yakking his baloney.


9 posted on 07/12/2012 3:18:25 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, 5:13; John 3:17-18, 6:69, 11:25, 14:6, 20:31; Rom10:8-11; 1 Tim 2:5; Titus 3:4-5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tgusa

The standoff range would be either the length of the leads to the device OR the stun gun might charge a small object that contains the charged capacitor and which would discharge on impact with the target.

I wrote a paper detailing a system somewhat similar to what is described. If built it would have launched small bean-bag like projectiles that had the circuitry inside and were covered with small sticky patches that adhere to the skin and were also the electrodes for the electrical discharge. The cost was modest as the system incorporated only simple low-cost elements.... not complicated at all.


10 posted on 07/12/2012 3:29:14 PM PDT by Bobalu (It is not obama we are fighting, it is the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

Oh, in the paper I also described a low-cost but totally effective counter measure for the system. Chain mail sacks...just pull it over your head for protection. The electrical pulse harmlessly shorts out across the chain mail surface and you have no problem seeing right through the sack...just like looking through a screen door.

A cheap and simple counter measure.


11 posted on 07/12/2012 3:36:51 PM PDT by Bobalu (It is not obama we are fighting, it is the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
so that they are incapacitated but not permanently damaged...

Yup, can't be killing our slaves now, can we. We need all our Taxpayers...undamaged!

12 posted on 07/12/2012 3:42:40 PM PDT by Dubh_Ghlase (Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls, It tolls for thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
Shoot, that nearly happens to me every time Obamugabe comes on TV

And if not then, soon after the dozen shots necessary to make it through hit.

13 posted on 07/12/2012 3:51:28 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Non-lethal weapons mean attackers don’t have to be afraid of dying. They can keep coming, and stomp you to death.

IN any case, this look like just another taser gun. So added “limited shots” and “limited penetration” to the uselessness of the device.


14 posted on 07/12/2012 3:51:59 PM PDT by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

/ close enough

15 posted on 07/12/2012 3:56:33 PM PDT by TonyInOhio ("If we want to get rid of Obamacare, we're going to have to replace President Obama.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain; Black Agnes

A lesson that the Brits learned in Northern Ireland was that “less than lethals” didn’t really stop the fight. Folks didn’t go home and take up knitting after being hit by plastic bullets, etc. Instead, they got even MORE pissed off, and took up long range methods of retaliation.


16 posted on 07/12/2012 6:18:58 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Non-lethal = used more.


17 posted on 07/13/2012 3:06:57 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson