Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: moonshot925

“...said the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to give details of the investigation”.

“It was not immediately clear where the alleged conversation took place or exactly how many officers took part in the conversation”.

“It was not immediately clear what type of firearm was allegedly shown”.

“Police officials declined to identify the officer. Officials from the U.S. Attorney’s office declined comment”.

” police union chief Kristopher Baumann said he did not have details on the matter”.

” A Secret Service spokesman declined to provide further details...”

Very informative story. at least you got it out first, thats all that really matters.


6 posted on 07/12/2012 3:42:43 PM PDT by Gettin Betta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gettin Betta

I think we can all agree that threatening to shoot the first lady isn’t cool.


7 posted on 07/12/2012 3:47:17 PM PDT by Winstons Julia (Hello OWS? We don't need a revolution like China's; China needs a revolution like OURS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Gettin Betta

I would bet it wasn’t a threat at all and nothing will come of it.


8 posted on 07/12/2012 3:54:06 PM PDT by babygene (Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Gettin Betta

My bet is:

It was a picture of an elephant gun.


14 posted on 07/12/2012 5:25:23 PM PDT by lack-of-trust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson