Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Guts Welfare Reform (We know Why He Did This!!!)
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | July 13, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 07/13/2012 2:34:19 PM PDT by Kaslin

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Barack Obama yesterday or the day before maybe (the days run together) gutted warfare reform. He just wrote it out of existence. He wrote out the work requirements for welfare. It's gone, with an executive command to Health and Human Services, Department of Labor, and whatever departments.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Yesterday the Obama administration issued a new directive stating that the traditional work requirements of the new welfare reform law back in 1996, those new work requirements, can be waived or overridden by a legal device called a waiver authority under the Social Security law. Welfare reform has been gutted, ladies and gentlemen.

That's right. While everybody's worried about who the vice presidential nominee is gonna be and whether or not the nominee's pro-life, pro-choice, pro-Martian, everybody is worried about whether Mitt Romney left Bain Capital in 1999 or 1998 or 2001, Barack Obama continues his systematic dismantling of the private sector economy of the United States of America. After this move, if anybody thinks that the attack on the way this country was founded is simply accidental, you can't.

This is from the Heritage Foundation, Robert Rector, who has been at Heritage probably longer than Obama's been alive. Bob Rector. He's done some of the best work on poverty in this country as compared to poverty around the world. If you have taken my advice and become a Heritage member, you need to search and absorb some of the work of Bob Rector, R-e-c-t-o-r. Kiki Bradley also helped put together this report: "Obama Guts Welfare Reform." It's from yesterday.

"The Obama Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released an official policy directive rewriting the welfare reform law of 1996." The welfare reform law of 1996 was put together in Congress, where all laws are put together. Bill Clinton vetoed it two or three times. Finally, he signed it as part of his need to get reelected in 1996. And when he signed it, finally, a bunch of Democrats, led by the Reverend Jackson, demanded that he change it after the election. But he didn't. It was left intact. It has been working. It requires work or an attempt to work in order to qualify for welfare payments.

"The new policy guts the federal work requirements that were the foundation of the reform law. The Obama directive bludgeons the letter and intent of the actual reform legislation. Welfare reform replaced the old Aid to Families with Dependent Children." That was the program where a mother got paid for every child she had, whether the husband was around or not. Ninety-nine times out of a hundred the husband wasn't around. The federal government became the husband and the provider. It became profitable to have babies and it was a program out of control. Welfare reform fixed it, and AFDC became welfare reform. The actual name of the welfare reform law is Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. TANF is the acronym.

"The underlying concept of welfare reform was that able-bodied adults should be required to work or prepare for work as a condition of receiving welfare aid. The welfare reform law is often characterized as simply giving state governments more flexibility in operating welfare programs. This is a serious misunderstanding. While new law (the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996) did grant states more flexibility in some respects, the core of the act was the creation of rigorous new federal work standards that state governments were required to implement.

"The welfare reform law was very successful. In the four decades prior to welfare reform, the welfare caseload never experienced a significant decline. But, in the four years after welfare reform, the caseload dropped by nearly half." It worked. Half of people on welfare, AFDC, which then became TANF, dropped out of the program. Employment surged. You had to find work to stay on welfare. You had to try to find work to stay on welfare. You had to work, and it worked. Employment surged. "Child poverty," Rector's special area of expertise, "child poverty among affected groups plummeted. The driving force behind these improvements was the rigorous new federal work requirements contained in the TANF law."

Half of the welfare caseload dropped in four years. It worked. Obama can't abide that. We don't want people off of welfare in this regime. We don't want people leaving the welfare rolls. Those are voters that are getting away. We want more people in the welfare rolls. We're gonna advertise food stamps. We're gonna have food stamp parties, and I'm gonna do all this while asking everybody to worry about what Mitt Romney's doing with his money.

So how did Obama do this? What was the trick? "The Obama Administration issued a new directive stating that the traditional TANF work requirements can be waived or overridden by a legal device called the section 1115 waiver authority under the Social Security law (42 U.S.C. 1315). Section 1115 states that 'the Secretary may waive compliance with any of the requirements' of specified parts of various laws. But this is not an open-ended authority: Any provision of law that can be waived under section 1115 must be listed in section 1115 itself. The work provisions of the TANF program are contained in section 407 (entitled, appropriately, 'mandatory work requirements'). Critically, this section, as well as most other TANF requirements, are deliberately not listed in section 1115; they are not waiveable."

I hope this is not too hard to follow. You start throwing numbers out, people get confused. Basically the people that wrote the law suspected that future administrations might try to play tricks and waive the work requirements, so they said the only thing that could be waived is in this section. Well, they did not put the work requirement in that section. So the law says that the work requirements cannot be waived. Yet Obama did it yesterday. That's right, "In establishing TANF, Congress deliberately exempted or shielded nearly all of the TANF program from the section 1115 waiver authority. They did not want the law to be rewritten at the whim of Health and Human Services (HHS) bureaucrats. Of the roughly 35 sections of the TANF law, only one is listed as waiveable under section 1115. This is section 402. Section 402 describes state plans -- reports that state governments must file to HHS describing the actions," and then it gets into a bunch of bureaucratese.

The welfare reform law became a blank slate. This new Obama dictate asserts that because the work requirements are mentioned as an item that state governments have to report, all the work requirements can be waived. It's not the law. That's just their lawless interpretation of it. And their lawless interpretation removes the core of welfare reform. Welfare reform thus becomes a blank piece of paper, blank slate that Health and Human Services bureaucrats and liberal state bureaucrats can rewrite at their own will, like Obamacare is.

"In a December 2001 document, 'Welfare Reform Waivers and TANF,' the non-partisan Congressional Research Service clarified that the limited authority to waive state reporting requirement in section 402 does not grant authority to override work and other major requirements. ... In the past, state bureaucrats have attempted to define activities --" and I'm not making this up. In order to get around the law -- this is what liberals have done in order to get around the welfare reform law, which requires work, liberal "state bureaucrats have attempted to define activities such as hula dancing, attending Weight Watchers, and bed rest as 'work.' These dodges were blocked by the federal work standards. Now that the Obama Administration has abolished those standards, we can expect 'work' in the TANF program to mean anything but work."

And so what happened yesterday, "The new welfare dictate issued by the Obama Administration clearly guts the law. The Administration tramples on the actual legislation passed by Congress and seeks to impose its own policy choices -- a pattern that has become all too common in this Administration. The result is the end of welfare reform." It's over. Have you seen it reported anywhere? Have you seen the media even celebrating it? Have you seen any Democrat go on television and talk about, "Hey, guess what? We have reformed welfare reform and we've taken the work requirement out." Have you seen this story on this at all? You haven't. It's not part of the narrative.

The narrative is what's Romney doing with his money. The narrative is when did Romney leave Bain. The narrative is Romney is a felon. The narrative is Condoleezza Rice, who's pro-choice, gonna be Romney's VP. All the while those diversions are going on, the Barack Obama administration is gutting at every opportunity they have the basic foundations and fiber of this country. While they're out there spreading this class warfare and class envy business, that you're poor because he's not, he's only rich because he's taken what you had, and we're gonna punish him by raising his taxes, and so you'll feel be, all this class warfare stuff. While all that's going on, Barack Obama gutted welfare reform and basically said all you have to do is sit on your ass and we'll now call that work, and you qualify for welfare. That happened yesterday.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: I thought Barack Obama liked work. I thought Barack Obama was out there talking about trying to create jobs, folks. I thought Barack Obama's number one priority was finding a way to keep jobs in this country from being outsourced, and he was going out and he was the expert! "Barack Obama, he's the one that knows how to create jobs in this country." Here he is gutting welfare reform!

I thought, by the way, that Barack Obama -- prior to the Supreme Court decision on health care -- was out there intimidating the justices. He was telling them that they had no business overturning a law passed by "the duly-elected representatives of the people." Do I remember that right? I have that right. Obama, along with Patrick Leahy, were threatening John Roberts and threatening the justices: "You do not overturn laws passed by the duly-elected representatives of the people!"

And Obama himself just went in there and writes an executive order and guts welfare reform. Mr. Job-Creation! Mr. Jobs! No, they didn't call it anything. There wasn't any announcement. They just did it! Now, Romney has responded to Obama's gutting of welfare reform. Romney said, quote, "President Obama now wants to strip the established work requirements from of welfare.

"The success of bipartisan welfare reform passed under President Clinton has rested on the obligation to work. The president's action is completely misdirected. Work is a dignified endeavor. The linkage of work and welfare is essential to prevent welfare from becoming a way of life." Well, that's kind of whispering in a crowd, but he still said something about it. But you ought to turn it into an ad. Turn this into an ad and let everybody know what happened. Half of the welfare rolls...

Let me put it another way: The welfare rolls were reduced by 50% in four years with the passage of welfare reform. Half of the people on welfare found work in the first four years. And yesterday Obama guts it. Mr. Jobs. Mr. Work. Mr. Worried About Outsourcing. Mr. American Dream talking about working hard and getting someplace in life is what his administration's all about. All Obama wanted to do was double government dependency, which he's done.

END TRANSCRIPT


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho44; dependency; rushtranscripts; welfare

1 posted on 07/13/2012 2:34:25 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I believe Obama knows he will be beaten this year, and he is in high speed wrecking mode.

Doing all he can as fast as he can to destroy America.


2 posted on 07/13/2012 2:53:08 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
Yes, was thinking the same thing the other day when I first saw this. Or, at least hedging his bets. But this should end up in court, I would think.
3 posted on 07/13/2012 3:02:29 PM PDT by Major Matt Mason ("Journalism is dead. All news is suspect." - Noamie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Rush, you dint mentioned the part about Oblowme using this to buy votes. But the rest was good. We should hear about this on the Alphabet channels in any minute now, right?


4 posted on 07/13/2012 3:03:50 PM PDT by Gasshog (Tragically,Obama ate the blue dog...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

When I read the title I knew it was to screw Clinton. He hates Clinton and trying to undo all the programs he put into place. Not only welfare reform but also Don’t ask don’t tell. It appears that Rush agrees with me.


5 posted on 07/13/2012 3:22:45 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Rush is right - it should be in an ad.

Hopefully, it will be - it can be another following the theme of “another reason you cannot trust Barack Obama”.


6 posted on 07/13/2012 3:28:05 PM PDT by Principled (It's not enthusiasm for Romney, it's grim determination to remove Hussein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Hey Zer0, why dont you just set up a stand outside the White House? Dont be coy. Have your check book ready and just ask people how much how much they want for their vote in November. For demanding voters, have a guy with a hoop; be prepared to jump through it!!


7 posted on 07/13/2012 3:45:50 PM PDT by Don@VB (Power Corrupts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

His damn supporters DON’T WORK and they DON’T PAY TAXES!!!! These people should not be listened to!!


8 posted on 07/13/2012 3:47:40 PM PDT by Ann Archy ( ABORTION...the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

R E P A R A T I O N


9 posted on 07/13/2012 4:06:23 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

And the sound of crickets comes from the GOP. They should be impeaching the POS.


10 posted on 07/13/2012 4:06:36 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
They should be impeaching the POS.

There is a much quicker, more effective -- and hugely more satisfying -- remedy.

In a little over three months, the voters can vote the POS out of office -- in a resounding landslide.

If we do our jobs, the Congress won't have to do their's.

11 posted on 07/13/2012 4:11:54 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
They should be impeaching the POS.

There is a much quicker, more effective -- and hugely more satisfying -- remedy.

In a little over three months, the voters can vote the POS out of office -- in a resounding landslide.

If we do our jobs, the Congress won't have to do their's.

12 posted on 07/13/2012 4:12:12 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Yeh doing the job congress just won’t do.


13 posted on 07/13/2012 4:15:23 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: okie01
"If we do our jobs, the Congress won't have to do their's."

I've been waiting for years for Congress to start working....wake me when it happens.

14 posted on 07/13/2012 4:19:48 PM PDT by Carbonsteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
And the sound of crickets comes from the GOP. They should be impeaching the POS.

Bump.

But you know, the GOP isn't done with Obozo yet -- they need to know Obamacare will stand up, and that they can tell the Fortune 500 companies to go ahead and dump their healthcare plans and flow their healthcare premiums through to the bottom line. That is why the GOP ditched the 2008 election, and why they're ditching this one, too.

It'll be a miracle if Romney gets elected, and frankly PTB don't want the White House this year. Not until private health insurance (except for executives) is dead and gone.

15 posted on 07/13/2012 4:21:10 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: okie01
"If we do our jobs, the Congress won't have to do their's."

I've been waiting for years for Congress to start working....wake me when it happens.

16 posted on 07/13/2012 4:22:19 PM PDT by Carbonsteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Welfare Under the Obama Administration: Bed Rest as Work

An Analysis of How the Obama Administration is Undermining Welfare Reform

WASHINGTON - In a questionable guidance scheme released yesterday to states, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) believes it can unilaterally grant itself the authority to exempt states from the work requirements that were a critical element of welfare reform and that could allow states to allow things like bed rest, smoking cessation and exercise to count as a work activity to receive these government benefits.

The 1996 welfare reform bill, otherwise known as the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), ended welfare as an entitlement and empowered states with the authority to create unique and robust welfare to work programs.  A central feature of devolution of federal authority back to the states was a vigorous work requirement for states, including a specific set of activities that qualified as “work.”

Over the years, as states used the reduction in the welfare caseload to mitigate compliance with the 1996 TANF work requirement, the focus on vital welfare to work initiatives diminished.

In 2005, the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office reported that several states listed as part of their definition of a “federal work activity” under TANF the following:

1.    Bed rest
2.    Personal care activities
3.    Massage
4.    Exercise
5.    Journaling
6.    Motivational reading
7.    Smoking cessation
8.    Weight loss promotion
9.    Participating in parent teacher meetings
10.    Helping a friend or relative with household tasks and errands

More at link below...

http://www.4-traders.com/news/U-S-Senate-Committee-on-Finance-Welfare-Under-the-Obama-Administration-Bed-Rest-as-Work—14413446/


17 posted on 07/13/2012 4:33:17 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
gutted warfare reform

Sure hope that's a typo. Wouldn't surprise me if it isn't.

18 posted on 07/13/2012 4:43:02 PM PDT by Libloather (The epitome of civility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I am sure it is. On the other hand maybe he is talking or hinting about class warfare?


19 posted on 07/13/2012 4:58:30 PM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

being allowed to vote while on the public dole is a CONFLICT OF INTEREST !!!!
enough is enough.....


20 posted on 07/13/2012 5:20:57 PM PDT by nevermorelenore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

21 posted on 07/13/2012 5:57:06 PM PDT by 4Liberty (88% of Americans are NON-UNION. We value honest, peaceful Free trade-NOT protectionist CARTELS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Major Matt Mason

But this should end up in court, I would think
...........................................................
Who would you think will take him to court?

The same people who watched him make recess appointments when there was no recess? Or the same people who watched him give amnesty after the Senate turned it down 4 times in a row.Maybe the people who and court who watched as Roberts gave Obamacare a new nmae so he could make it Constitutional.

Take him to court? That’s a laugh. The Republicans are frightened to death of being called racist, and the Democrats have their heads up his ass.If he went to court he owns the court. Roberts gave it to him as a gift.

We have but one chance to get out of this mess without a CW2 and that is to vote him out in November, and then have a President who will restore America.

Do i think romney can do it? No, but I intend to give him a chance.


22 posted on 07/13/2012 6:06:50 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

But you know, the GOP isn't done with Obozo yet -- they need to know Obamacare will stand up, and that they can tell the Fortune 500 companies to go ahead and dump their healthcare plans and flow their healthcare premiums through to the bottom line. That is why the GOP ditched the 2008 election, and why they're ditching this one, too.

It'll be a miracle if Romney gets elected, and frankly PTB don't want the White House this year. Not until private health insurance (except for executives) is dead and gone.

Now you sound clinically insane. I mean that sounds like something Alex Jones would say.

Seek help.


23 posted on 07/13/2012 6:58:43 PM PDT by rdb3 (If you were tried in court for being a Christian, would there be enough evidence to convict you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2; Carbonsteel
Yeh doing the job congress just won’t do.

If we've learned one thing over the past twelve-or-so years, we've learned that it's up to us. Nobody else.

We can't count on Congress to do their job. We can't count on the President to do his.

The only recourse we have is a.) the ballot box and b.) the inbox and the answering machine.

As conservatives, much as we'd like to avoid any contact with government, we've got to be involved -- constantly!

Otherwise, government grows -- like a plague or an epidemic...

24 posted on 07/13/2012 9:00:45 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Now you sound clinically insane. I mean that sounds like something Alex Jones would say.

Is Alex Jones saying it? I wouldn't know.

My comment is based on 1) retarded GOP big-donation giving during 2007-8, which brought several commentators the insight that the big donors and RNC didn't really want the White House; they wanted Hillary in it when the ceiling came in on the economy.

Extending the logic, recovery is some time off yet, so why take the responsibility for the economy back?

Item 2), the part about Obozocare is from a Howell Raines article in Conde' Nast's Portfolio in October, 2008, in which he laid out the evidence that Obamacare was in, the deal was done, and the RNC Lords Ordainers and the DNC Lords Ordainers and PTB's were just waiting to get the 2008 election out of the way so they could bulldoze private health insurance plans off corporate books.

Now, I've cited my references. Do you still think I'm "insane"? Or are you just failing to connect dots that fall outside the box constructed by talk radio and the MSM?

25 posted on 07/14/2012 3:51:29 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Welfare parasites will no longer count in the unemployment figures so the unemployment number will drop.

He is rigging the unemployment number right before the election!


26 posted on 07/14/2012 9:27:19 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (I miss Harriet Miers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson