Posted on 07/14/2012 4:02:01 AM PDT by Kaslin
The ghost of Ronald Reagan is about to haunt President Obama. If Mitt Romney has any political savvy at all, he will begin channeling the late president and introduce his ghost into the economic debate forthwith.
Back in July of 1980, when Reagan was challenging President Jimmy Carter, the unemployment rate in America was 7.8 percent -- close to what it is now. But the inflation rate was more than 13 percent, and that was eroding American wealth at a frightening clip. Reagan seized on the economic turmoil to hammer Carter as an incompetent, and that won the election for the former actor and governor of California.
After Reagan moved into the White House, he walked the walk. He convinced Congress to drop the federal income tax rate for the wealthiest Americans from an incredible 70 percent to 28 percent. Reagan also held the line on federal hiring. During his eight years in office, just 12,000 federal workers were added to the payroll. By contrast, Carter hired 100,000 federal employees in four years.
As history unfolded, the American economy roared back during the Reagan era, making him a hero to free-marketers and small-government devotees. His legacy was built on robust capitalism and effective opposition to the communist world.
In 2012, America is not bedeviled by inflation, but we are stuck in the economic mud. Under Obama, government spending has reached record levels, and in three years, Obama has added about 130,000 federal workers to the payroll: more than 10 times the number Reagan added in five fewer years. It is breathtaking.
And now Obama wants to jack up tax rates on the affluent all over the place. Income, capital gains and dividends all will be taxed at a significantly higher rate if Congress goes along with the president. Again, this is the exact opposite of what Reagan did.
What Obama hopes to accomplish is hard to ascertain. The feds will derive about $85 billion in extra revenue a year if the president's proposed tax hike is passed. But listen to this: The feds spend $85 billion every eight and a half days, according to the Treasury Department. Talk about putting your finger in a leaking dike.
Of course, the downside of raising taxes on the wealthy is that it might further constrict investment and consumer spending, thereby harming the already fragile economy. Is that risk really worth eight and a half days of revenue?
And so the ghost of Ronald Reagan hovers, just waiting for a Romney seance in order to make his presence felt. We do indeed live in scary times.
“Look, I was an independent during the time of Reagan/Bush. Im not trying to return to Reagan/Bush.” — Willard
Buy any gas or food lately?
Mitt: Ameriac! You got your “change” now how’s the “hope” workin’ out for ya’?
“But Bill, I dont want to go back to the time of Reagan and Bush. I was an Independent during the time of Reagan” Willard Romney, 1994
“In 1994 I didnt know who Reagan was” Willard Romney during a debate, 2012
“Until 1994 we didnt know any Repubicans. We didnt have any Republican friends” Ann Romney
No Bill I dont think Willard can channel President Ronald Reagan..
from an incredible 70 percent to 28 percent.70% isnt so incredible when you realize that FDR had it at over - I did say over - 90%. The Kennedy tax cut took it from 91% down to 70%.
Much as I disliked Kennedy as president, if you told me today I could skip the election and have JFK - as he was in 1962 for four years, with no risk of an Obama reelection, Id take it in a heartbeat.Especially since the best alternative we can hope for is Romney . . .
When I saw the title I thought for sure that the article would talk about Reagans There you go again meme in response to Obamas scurrilous falsehoods.
Remembering the probably most prophetic words ever to come out of the mouth of Tom Brocaw (former Main Stream news anchor).
As Ronald Reagan was appearing for perhaps his last time as President, Tom Brocaw said—Mr. President, maybe in the future when America is really in touble, you will come over the hill on your white horse and rescue her!
I am sure I have the essence correct of what he said and wish I had the exact quote. Does anyone else remember this??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.