Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerLikesRooster
If I remember correctly, the DF-21D was a ballistic missile originally designed to carry a nuclear warhead. In short, China wants to attack our carrier battle groups with a circa 400 kT nuclear warhead inside a maneuverable re-entry vehicle (MARV). The Russians had a similar idea, but their system was based on large cruise missiles guided by specially-modified Tu-95 Bear bombers equipped with special long-range guidance radars.

Mind you, I'm not sure if this is practical, especially now that US Navy destroyers are now re-equipping with the new versions of the Standard SAM that can intercept a target over 100 miles up.

20 posted on 07/16/2012 1:39:40 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RayChuang88
See my post 21 the DF-21D anti carrier weapon (and they say it will have a conventional warhead) is a red herring. I do not believe it exists at all for th reasons I cite. We are to believe they have such a weapon, with not a shred of evidence (other than what amounts to chatter in Chinese white papers)...not one operational test...that would require significant and expensives break throughs by the Chinese in multiple areas at once, and would then be attacking into the teeth of our carrier defenses, the AEGIS System which, is designed to defend against just this sort of attack (anti-air, missile attacks) and is now equipped with a system that has been tested and shown to be able to shoot down attacking ballistic missiles? I'm not buying it.
22 posted on 07/16/2012 3:56:54 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free, never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson