Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Minnesota: The Latest Shameful Attack on Voter ID
The Foundry/Heritage Foundation ^ | July 16, 2012 at 4:20 pm | Hans von Spakovsky

Posted on 07/16/2012 5:59:41 PM PDT by Hunton Peck

The latest attack on voter ID is occurring in Minnesota, where on Tuesday, the state Supreme Court will hear a case filed by the League of Women Voters (LWV).

In League of Women Voters Minnesota v. Ritchie, the LWV is trying to convince the court to remove a referendum question from the November ballot. Its argument is that voters won’t be able to understand the ballot question.

This referendum was passed by the Minnesota legislature in April and would amend the state constitution to require all voters voting in person to “present valid government-issued photographic identification before receiving a ballot.” The amendment would also require absentee voters to be “subject to substantially equivalent identity and eligibility verification.”

In Minnesota, once a constitutional referendum has been approved by the legislature, it has to be approved by the voters of the state. But unlike some states that simply put the entire constitutional amendment on the ballot, Minnesota puts a shorter summary of the referendum. There have been 213 prior ballot questions decided by Minnesota voters, and the legislature has typically provided voters with a single-sentence description. The legislature designated the ballot question for this constitutional amendment as:

Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?

According to LWV, this ballot question is “so fundamentally unfair and misleading that it evades the constitutional requirement to submit the proposed constitutional amendment to a popular vote.” In other words, Minnesota voters are too dumb and ill-informed to understand a ballot question that says that it will amend the state constitution to require photo ID of all voters.

To no one’s great surprise in Minnesota, the ACORN-endorsed secretary of state, Mark Ritchie, who helped Al Franken pull the 2008 Senate race right out from under Norm Coleman, refused to file an answer to the lawsuit. That indicates that he agrees with the plaintiff and would no doubt like to lose the case (what is called collusive litigation in legal circles).

The Minnesota legislature intervened in the case to defend the ballot referendum and hired a prominent Minnesota law firm, Winthrop & Weinstine, to protect the interests of the Minnesota legislature and, most importantly, the voters of Minnesota.

The legislature has pointed out that under both Minnesota law and longstanding precedent, the language of such a ballot question is solely and exclusively within the province and authority of the legislature. It would indeed be an unprecedented interference in the legislature’s prerogatives and a violation of separation of powers if the court intervened and either changed or eliminated the referendum question from the ballot.

What no doubt annoys the LWV and the other organizations that have joined the suit (such as the ACLU and Common Cause) is that they lost in the legislative process. This amendment was thoroughly debated and discussed by the duly elected representatives of the voters in three House committee hearings, four Senate committee hearings, one conference committee hearing, and numerous floor debates. Fourteen amendments were offered in the House and 15 in the Senate. But neither the LWV nor any of the other opponents of voter ID could make the case that there was anything wrong with this common-sense election reform.

The LWV, whose mission statement says that it works to promote the “active participation of citizens in government,” is trying to prevent the active participation of voters in government in Minnesota. The LWV does not want Minnesota voters to vote on this issue because they are afraid it will pass—polling shows that Americans overwhelmingly approve of voter ID. So the LWV is trying to stop the democratic process through litigation, a thoroughly anti-democratic action that strikes at the very idea of popular sovereignty.

The LWV should be ashamed that it is trying to suppress the vote of Minnesota citizens. Let’s hope the Minnesota Supreme Court is not taken in by this discreditable attempt to circumvent the democratic process.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: leagueofwomenvoters; markritchie; votefraud; voterid

1 posted on 07/16/2012 5:59:49 PM PDT by Hunton Peck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

Minnesota vote integrity ping!


2 posted on 07/16/2012 6:00:59 PM PDT by Hunton Peck (The patient is bleeding to death! Apply more leeches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

The LWV is a bunch of DNC cronies.


3 posted on 07/16/2012 6:02:49 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck
Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?

Lest we maintain voter fraud in Minnesota....

Photobucket

4 posted on 07/16/2012 6:06:08 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

LZV League of Zombie Voters...


5 posted on 07/16/2012 6:08:57 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1272 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Heroes aren't made Frank, they're cornered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck
"Its argument is that voters won’t be able to understand the ballot question."
Incredible. But that is what it comes down to with the democrats. They need idiots to vote for them. As well as the not so dumb who are on the money doles.
6 posted on 07/16/2012 6:14:06 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Like the NAALCP, it’s really the LLWV.


7 posted on 07/16/2012 6:14:11 PM PDT by Hunton Peck (The patient is bleeding to death! Apply more leeches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck
Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?

If voters do not understand that they should not be allowed near a ballot.

LWV should have their voting privilege revoked.

8 posted on 07/16/2012 6:20:44 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
"Its argument is that voters won’t be able
to understand the ballot question."



Help End The Obama Era In 2012
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!

9 posted on 07/16/2012 6:20:44 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

Shame on the LWV for joining such Leftist groups as SEIU in opposing fair elections. Happily, these clueless women are graying and will not be here forever.


10 posted on 07/16/2012 6:23:51 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

I voted in the 2010 elections in Minnesota - the one that gave the state Crazy Eyes Dayton. The State declared that anyone wearing a T shirt with “Ask for My ID” would be arrested.
When I got to the election judge’s table to get my ballot, where all that is needed would be for one to point to the name in the sign in book, I gave the election judge my Minnesota drivers license - without being prompted to do so. I got the stinky eye for that one.
No longer in Minnesota, where my vote does not count anyway, since Mark Ritchie is already bought and paid for.


11 posted on 07/16/2012 6:39:44 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is the operational wing of CPUSA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

Its argument is that voters won’t be able to understand the ballot question.

Possible ... they elected a wrestler for Governor and Al Franken, the local village idiot as Senator .... must observe that the Minnesota public is suspect.


12 posted on 07/16/2012 7:12:48 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Skittle pooping unicorns are more common than progressives with honor & integrity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

When I was a kid, I was taught that the LWV was a good guy group.

The older I get, the more I realize they are NOT.

They are evil.


13 posted on 07/16/2012 7:39:18 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

Theres some truth to what the dem is saying. MOST ppl DON’T understand the political dem view point on why they should be against voter id. Its a racist law, but most ppl don’t see it


14 posted on 07/16/2012 7:55:41 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthWoody; Manic_Episode; mikethevike; coder2; AmericanChef; Reaganesque; ER Doc; lesser_satan; ...

WELCOME TO FREE REPUBLIC’S MINNESOTA PING LIST!

151 MEMBERS AND GROWING...!

FREEPMAIL ME IF YOU WANT ON OR OFF THIS LIST!


15 posted on 07/16/2012 8:19:22 PM PDT by MplsSteve (General Mills is pro-gay marriage! Boycott their products!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

In 2008, I voted at my precinct in southwest Minneapolis.

I gave the pollworker my name and address and and she was looking for it, I asked her “How do you even know if I’m Steve S......? You do realize that I could walk in here and vote under someone else’s name - right?”

I didn’t say it loudly and I didn’t say it with any anger or sarcasm in my voice. The pollworker stopped and looked at me as if I just asked her if she was a space alien too. The pollworker next to her chimed in and told me not to make trouble.

I laughed at both of them, this time in a sarcastic tone and reminded them “You know, you really have no idea if I am who I’m claiming to be”.

You know what? I got the feeling that they truly didn’t care if I committed voter fraud or not.


16 posted on 07/16/2012 8:26:36 PM PDT by MplsSteve (General Mills is pro-gay marriage! Boycott their products!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

You know what? I got the feeling that they truly didn’t care if I committed voter fraud or not.


They probably figured you where going to vote for “their
guy anyway. What are the odds of someone in Minneapolis voting republican?

I think you might be the last one in the city that would.

Keep your gun close and your powder dry.


17 posted on 07/16/2012 9:07:54 PM PDT by cableguymn (For the first time in my life. I fear my country's government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

It (voter is) is a “racist law”?

How?


18 posted on 07/16/2012 9:38:25 PM PDT by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

Hey Steve - do you have a feel - or have you seen any local commentary - on how the SCourt will call this one?


19 posted on 07/16/2012 11:24:36 PM PDT by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jonno
The only reason to object to voter ID, is if you are in favor of voter fraud.

THIS SHOULD BE SHOUTED FROM THE ROOFTOPS ALL ACROSS THE LAND!!!!

20 posted on 07/17/2012 3:31:55 AM PDT by snowtigger (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jonno

“...do you have a feel - or have you seen any local commentary - on how the SCourt will call this one?”

I really don’t. Even amongst GOP bloggers here in Minnesota, there doesn’t seem to be much commentary about it.


21 posted on 07/17/2012 6:29:24 AM PDT by MplsSteve (General Mills is pro-gay marriage! Boycott their products!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
"Its argument is that voters won’t be able to understand the ballot question."

You have to understand Lib-Speak. Notice how, when confronted with a different opinion, libs tend to say "Oh, he's just ignorant"?

In Lib-speak "he's ignorant" or "he doesn't understand" really just means "he hasn't been sufficiently indoctrinated in the Party Line".

22 posted on 07/17/2012 7:07:48 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (If I can't be persuasive, I at least hope to be fun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

I believe you have the far left operators pegged pretty well.


23 posted on 07/17/2012 8:43:22 AM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
Libs tend to lose when they actually have to debate the logic of their positions. This makes it imperative to side-step any actual debate.

The main ways that this is done is by either declaring the opposing speaker as unworthy of debating ("He's ignorant", "He's stupid", "Fox LIES!") or by declaring his position as anathema ("Racist!", "Sexist!", "Homophobic!", "Hate Speech!") and thus not a fit subject to speak about. Just shutting down the opponent is also a favorite, whether accomplished by shouting over him, or prohibiting him from speaking because of threats of violence.

24 posted on 07/17/2012 8:58:02 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (If I can't be persuasive, I at least hope to be fun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RetiredTexasVet
Possible ... they elected a wrestler for Governor and Al Franken, the local village idiot as Senator .... must observe that the Minnesota public is suspect.

The DFL has perfected the art of vote fraud in this state.

Jesse "The Dork" Ventura won because he split the vote 3 ways and used one of the DFL's little tricks to his advantage >> Same day registration.

He got a bunch of young mush heads to show up,register,and vote the day of the election.

Thanks to the DFL, all you have to do to vote in MN is show up at the polls and point at a name in the register.

The DFL is scared to death of the Voter ID amendment passing.They are gearing up for a massive vote fraud run this time because if the Voter ID amendment passes, They know they are in heap big doo doo.

25 posted on 08/04/2012 6:21:32 PM PDT by HP8753 (Live Free!!!! .............or don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson