Communist mentor Obama backers trying to hide

When a biographer sets out to understand a president, he naturally begins with mentors, the people who helped shape his character, career and worldview, notes author Paul Kengor.

But when it comes to explaining Barack Obama, the establishment media has shown virtually no interest in delving into the life of the man the president himself held up as a guiding and affirming voice at every major point in his life.

"Such as it is, however, the press has become the greatest power within the Western countries, more powerful than the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. One would then like to ask: by what law has it been elected and to whom is it responsible? In the communist East a journalist is frankly appointed as a state official. But who has granted Western journalists their power, for how long a time and with what prerogatives?"
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Speech at Harvard University, June 8, 1978

Well, we don't know "FOR CERTAIN" that you're capable of pouring pee from a boot if the instructions are inscribed on the sole.

OH my, I can just "Feel the luv" from here.

Where did all that "civility thingy" come from?

From "he" who you spoiled, puerile, rabid, PAUL-BOTS want to see reelected, out of SPITE because "your" (loony-tune) candidate, did so bad? Barack Hussein Obama?

But AT BEST, Mr. Etch-a-Sketch is a pig in a poke, a surprise package, and we must disregard his entire political history to think there is anything delightful in there.

Gee, did you EVEN bother to re-read what you wrote? Or is English your 2nd language?

You are simply REPEATING what I advanced and AGREEING with me: "Mittens is a "pig in a poke," and his "history," does not bode well for what we Cons want.

You want a different scoundrel in the White House? Appeal to fear. Urge people to vote their fear of Obama. But don't insult their intelligence by saying we don't know how Romney would govern. He's an incorrigible repeat offender.

OK, let me see if I understand you: "You KNOW how Romney would govern, but REFUSE to even ADMIT or suggest you KNOW the same about Dear Leader?

Like all of your delusion "buds" you IGNORE my "CHALLENGE" to produce ONE SINGLE instance of whereby Mitt has EVER said or DONE anything to reflect a HATRED or intent on HARMING our Republic.......CUZ YOU CAN'T!!!

....while at the same time, IGNORING all the damage that Obama has done, and IGNORING what more he could do if reelected.

Now that's logic (nay, : "DENIAL") that one would expect from a Lib

That speaks volumes as to you (and your ILK's) BLIND HATRED toward Mitt and Mormons and ALMOST leads one to believe y'all REALLLLY want Obama to win!

Y'all have to live with your conscience; mine will be clear!

The only way back from where we are now requires a major reconfiguration of the media. We essentially have propagandists now. The current American media is in some ways worse than the worst days of Pravda. Pravda was at least recognized as state run media. The current American MSM operates under the guise of independence and non-bias, which makes them much more dangerous. Luckily a good portion of the American public no longer believes in the impartiality of the American media. Unfortunately, that includes the delusional who think that CNN is unbiased but Fox is a right wing outlet.

We have so much work to do.

“Y’all have to live with your conscience; mine will be clear!”

Your conscience gonna be clear when Mitt looses?

Rino McCain is the reason we are stuck with Odumbo now.

And should Mitt happen to win and continues or accelerates the slide into Socialism, how clear will your conscience be.

BTW. Calling folks who don’t like Mitt “anti-Morman” is getting a little tiresome. Kinda like being called a racist. It just doesn’t have quite the shock value it once did

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.