More homo nonsense...
BSA is on my donate list every year,
why dont the libs just create their own GSA and LSA (Gay/Lesbian Scouts of America) instead of ruining a great institution that helps boys become responsible men??
Fing libs! Won’t hear Republicans talking about this either, too scared.
If the BSA “caves”, it’s dead.
Which is all part of the plan anyway.
The BSA is one of the last nationally recognized bastions teaching and instilling positive values and morals to young men.
In a queer’s mind, it needs to be destroyed, it is the antithesis to queerdom, liberalism and godlessness.
Change.org “petitions” are meaningless. You can “sign” 10,000 times in a row from the same PC if you wish. Try it. Can’t do it on a site like GoPetitions, which blocks repeat emails addresses and IP addresses.
Good for the Boy Scouts standing their ground. The LBGT’s can **** off as far as I am concerned.
Let the LGBTetc start their own scouting-type organization. Then let the kids and their parents decide where they want to go. I’m confident in the result.
The Scouts won’t be safe until they kick-out those corporate executive board members who are supporting gay scouting.
Good related news:
It is a free country let them start their own groups and see how many parents let their kids join
The Catholic Church has had to pay about one billion dollars to compensate children who were victimized by church-provided “authority figures”.
So maybe it is time for the adult leaders of the Boy Scouts of America to tell all the “Progressives”, who think that sexual deviants somehow “deserve” to have free and easy access to innocent young boys, to either “put up” or “shut up”.
By “put up” I mean that — before approval of that policy-change is even discussed — the change-seeking “Progressives” must legally agree to indemnify the Boy Scouts of America from the costs of any sex-abuse-related compensatory judgments that result from that policy-change. IMHO, such indemnities need to be PERSONAL obligations and such indemnities need to be “joint-and-several”.
Then, if the policy-change is made and some poor boy is molested by a deviant scout leader, and if compensatory damages of, say, $10MM are awarded to that child, the end result would be that Mr. Tyrell, as a joint and several indemnitor, would have to write a personal check — up to full value of the $10MM judgment to indemnify the Boy Scouts for their financial loss.
Mr. Tyrell would have to pay his “share” of a second judgment — and a third judgment and so on.
Why should the Boy Scouts of America be driven into bankruptcy by the costs of the policy-change that Mr. Tyrell is so vigorously promoting?
So, let’s see how quickly Mr. Tyrell is able to turn his “petition” into a “Joint-and-Several Contract to Indemnify the Boy Scouts of America”.
If Mr. Tyrell can sign up enough wealthy people to actually PAY a liability of one billion dollars, then the discussion can proceed.
If not, then Mr. Tyrell should just “shut up”....
Why dont these fags and Queers start their own scout group?