Skip to comments.A man who can justify mass murder of innocent human life should be president?
Posted on 07/17/2012 11:55:45 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
I'm sorry folks, but a man who can justify and rationalize in his own mind the wholesale slaughter of innocent human life can justify any kind of evil whatsoever. And he has.
He's justified homosexual marriage, homosexuals in the Boy Scouts, homosexuals in the military. That homosexual couples should be able to adopt children. He's justified that guns are dangerous and should be banned. That free citizens should be forced by the government to purchase insurance contracts against their will or face stiff penalties or taxes. That mandated forced socialized healthcare is a good thing.
That abortion should be safe and legal in America. That since Roe v Wade has been in effect for over twenty years that it is settled law and should be defended as same. That when the government puts Planned Parenthood on the board of his own brainchild signature accomplishment and makes taxpayer funded abortion available on demand, "it's not his fault." That when he appoints liberal judges and appointees, it's not his fault. When a judge rules that homosexual couples should be allowed to marry, so HE orders it done, it's not his fault.
He's justified that the earth is warming and it's caused by man and we are going to have to do something about it. He's justified that since the economy is down and some companies are failing, that it's a good thing that the government stepped in and bailed them out. That government should spend MORE of what it doesn't have to stimulate the economy. That the debt limit should be increased so the government can continue spending even more of what it doesn't have. He's justified in his own mind that fee hikes are not tax increases.
My friends he has justified and personally enacted just about the entire liberal/progressive, abortionist/homosexualist, statist/socialist, big government anti-liberty agenda.
And they have the gonads to ask me for MY vote?
They’re not just ‘asking’ you for your vote, Jim ... they’re demanding it.
No surrender to statism.
Are you sure, Fetus, you’re former?
It we were that LOW and scummy, it would be easy to vote for Romney like you are.
It all boils down to my faith and politics cannot be separated.
Up until recently I thought the Obama/Holder/Axelrod crew were just Chicago thug pols who were had a similar mindset as Lenin or Stalin but who were not so ruthless that they would brazenly shoot their opponents in the street or “disappear” them in the middle of the night.
Then I realized that the only thing that upsets them about Fast and Furious is that it failed to nullify the Second Amendment. They are not showing any concern over the hundreds of Mexican lives this subversion and treason has cost so far, and they certainly don’t seem honestly upset at the deaths of US law enforcement personnel. Indeed, they are just continuing to bulldoze and stonewall their way through Congressional oversight and contempt resolutions as if nothing was amiss.
Now my opinion is that the only difference between Obama/Holder and Stalin/Beria is one scale. They appear to be of the same murderous spirit.
I’d like to note, as a point of order, that scum (by definition) is found at the top of a pond ... slime is generally found at the bottom thereof. Neither is an appealing substance, but slime is lower than scum.
Blood Brothers, same evil blood in their veins.
I imagine that Joe Paterno thought something similar when he supported Jerry Sandusky.
Jim, I think it’s established you ain’t voting for Romney.
For the sake of discussion and with all respect, Romney does not hold many of the positions you cite. Meaning in most cases he changed his position. The clearest is pro choice to pro life.
He’s not the first to make that switch. Imho yes a newly minted pro lifer is a better president than an avowed pro abortionist Obama.
Romney’s softness on the gay agenda, climate change, etc are a sad reflection on the weakness in our society as a whole. But Obama certainly is more evil and Romeny is NOT anti capitalism.
My recommendation: ALLEN WEST
As Mark Levin says...always vote for the most conservative candidate possible.
That’s what I’m doing - unfortunately he isn’t much of a conservative but he’s to the right of Stalin.
Obamacare will eventually kill me if it is allowed to stay...that’s my big issue.
Okay, let’s say it’s 7 people voting. 3 vote for Obama, 2 vote for Romney and 2 vote for a 3rd part candidate. Obama wins re-election. If the two that voted 3rd party had voted for Romney, Obama loses. Under certain circumstances, depending on the vote totals a non vote or a vote for a 3rd party can indeed lead to an Obama victory.
I voted for Santorum. He didn’t win.
Faced with R versus O, I’m voting for R. I’m not going third party, and not leaving the space blank.
I understand the alternate position, but I suspect 95% of FReepers will be voting R and hoping for O to lose. I could be wrong. We’ll see.
And Mitt’s a lousy fighter. Almost like he and Obama are on the same team...
-- Proverbs 29:25
Our Father, we grieve over what our nation has become. We've lost sight of You and have rejected Your ways. Forgive us; please, forgive us. Restore us to Your way. We authorize the destruction of our current government, which blatantly ignores our supreme law, it's own law and Your instruction. We ask for Your help returning to our father's intended government, a Republic under You. Amen.
Oh I don't know about that.
He does not let Latinos eat with metal utensils in his presence.
Nah. He's still a pro-choice democrat. An honest, objective analysis of his supposed "pro-life" statement on his website, to this day, proves it beyond any shadow of doubt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.