Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Impy

Nicholson was “bigger” than Keaton. Ditto that Marlon Brando and Gene Hackman were bigger than Christopher Reeve in 1978, the latter a soap opera actor (which was considered the lowest rung on the acting totem pole, below primetime tv actors) who mostly did stage work (and had only a small part in a film the same year “Superman” was released). Reeve wouldn’t have justifiably earned top billing until the second film, even if he was the lead actor.


28 posted on 07/21/2012 4:06:10 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj

I’m of the opinion that the protagonist should get top billing, especially if they are the title character. Though it’s been a while since I’ve seen it the first Batman may as well have been called “The Joker” though IIRC.

Wasn’t Brando in Superman in a glorified cameo?


29 posted on 07/23/2012 5:36:05 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson