Posted on 07/18/2012 7:04:39 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
Does a family photograph of a young Barack Obama posted on the president’s Facebook campaign page offer a clue to the identity of his real father?
A professional graphic artist who examined the 1973 photo believes the image of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, was airbrushed into the scene to cover up an African-American man who was standing next to Obama at the Honolulu airport.
Filmmaker Joel Gilbert, who commissioned the analysis, told WND there’s substantial evidence that the man in the original photograph was Frank Marshall Davis, the Communist Party member, pro-Soviet propagandist and pornographer who played a fatherly role in Obama’s teen years.
In his full-length documentary “Dreams from My Real Father,” Gilbert presents a compelling case that Davis was Obama’s biological father as well as his ideological mentor. He believes the Dunham family recruited the Kenyan student Barack Hussein Obama to act as the father, to cover up an illicit affair with a subversive political activist.
Gilbert posted a page on his website at the time this article was published with details of his find.
Gilbert says the black male hand under Obama’s armpit is strikingly similar to the right hand of Davis.
“We know from Obama’s own writing and interviews with Davis’ neighbors, that Obama was a regular visitor to Davis’ house from age 10,” Gilbert told WND. “This doctored photo on Obama’s own Facebook page seems to be part of a pattern of document forgery by President Obama to hide his biological and ideological relationship to communist Frank Marshall Davis.”
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
I hope Sheriff Joe sees this — and it’s genuine.
(check out the “bio” on the poster at bottom of page.)
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012/07/obamas-kenyan-birth-records-discovered.html
I’ve analyzed it using several different methods in Photoshop and can see no evidence of the photo being manipulated.
I think her hand, though it does look very dark, is simply in a shadow.
That was just to give you a rough idea of what the original photo must’ve looked like. It’s not the original photo. That’s long gone or hidden somewhere.
If I had some potentially embarrassing photo from my past and if I thought if the truth got out it could damage me or my career, I do not think I would spend my time trying to get control of them.
I would do the opposite. I would flood the market with embarrassing obvious fakes.
This way if a real photo should surface it can be brushed aside as a fake. True believers and true haters do not care about the truth. It is those in the middle that need to be confused so they give you the benefit of the doubt.
We know the main stream media will not investigate any story that may harm this President. So the fakes only have to be good enough to get it out there to cause doubt and something to be held up when any evidence is presented.
Serious question ~ why would the commies have to infiltrate the dock workers in Hawaii in the 1940s. Weren’t they under commie rule from the late 1910s?
Oh, come on now... any good leftist would say that Stanley had been doing some home improvement, restaining the banister or something.
Clearly it is the bottom photo that has been
photoshopped to erase the “O”.
Look at the repeated pattern in the cinderblock wall.
Yes, this is a real newsweek cover. Sullivan argues that Obama had to come out of the "closet" of being black or something.
To be honest though, I think this doctored pic might be more accurate regarding O's character than the other ones are regarding his past.
Raise your hand if you think 0bama’s head looks way to big here..
The notion of ‘her hand is in a shadow’ is a complete and total CROCK. THERE IS NO SHADOW THERE, never was and never will be. Study the little girl in the shadows and grandpa’s right hand then tell me ‘Ann’s hand’ is in a shadow. It’s broad daylight with the light coming from the front! What you REALLY have to wonder is why is this photo tweaked to be so faded on Obama’s Facebook page so you’ll not notice this alteration?
I’ve seen thousands and thousands of pictures and never have seen someone’s hand suddenly turn so dark. Perhaps if there had only been one light source in the room and something occluded the light from her hand, throwing it into complete darkness, perhaps then but even then I would be surprised to see it turn so dark on someone so light skinned. Here though the light is diffused pretty much evenly, so that even if Obama’s body were casting a shadow upon the hand it shouldn’t be that much of one.
What is also incredible is that the MSM is not on this case like stink on sh*t. The whole affair screams of a national conspiracy.
Many easy Pulitzer prizes to be won, but no takers among our “journalists”.
I am thinking it’s actually the boy who has been inserted into the picture. Also, I find it nearly impossible to believe that anyone would have used the original image (a positive, negative or Polaroid-type film) to make or assemble various alterations in this rendition. Most likely, all the person had to start with were two or more prints, which were scanned and then manipulated using Photoshop.
Because it’s bad enough Obama’s mothers’ naked photos are on the Internet. Worse would be that his father was a communist Soviet OPERATIVE AND A PORNOGRAPHER. How do you think those naked photos came to be?
That kid doesn’t look like Obama. He’s in a number of photos, including the grade-school pic in the Honolulu Star and one with Stanley at a zoo. all the same kid, totyally different from Obama. I’ve commented on this before so if I am boring everybody, well, that’s what I do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.