Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE OTHER RUSH: Obama's armor of evil
WND ^ | July 19, 2012 | Erik Rush

Posted on 07/19/2012 11:52:26 PM PDT by Perseverando

Exclusive: Erik Rush asks how far a 'naked communist' must go before he's exposed

For quite a while now, I’ve referred to President Barack Obama as a communist – not a progressive (which he has said he is), a liberal or a socialist – but a communist. It only made sense, given that the man was bred, raised and mentored by communists, employed and was employed by communists, eagerly fraternized with communists and diligently studied communism throughout his entire adult life. Even if one ignores his life before political office, there’s certainly enough remaining evidence of Obama’s communistic bent, most notably his “crowning achievement” of Obamacare and his administration’s insinuation into American industry. I believe in telling it like it is, and I see no reason to soft pedal communism for the sake of professional decorum – and certainly not for political correctness.

Liberals have a very pat, sophisticated response to the charge of Obama being a communist; so pat and sophisticated, in fact, that one might think each and every one had received a memo on the appropriate response.

Roll your eyes and smirk. State “no, he’s not.”

Unfortunately, many otherwise rational Americans’ assessments of Obama have been predicated upon what he says he is, as opposed to what he demonstrates he is. To this day, they hold those of us who are willing to employ “the c-word” as completely delusional.

If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen …

– Barack Obama, July 13, 2012

Every now and then, however the dirty little secret slips out. Obama’s speech to supporters in Roanoke, Va., last week evidenced his communist sympathies, when he maintained that business owners owe everything to others: workers and, of course, the government. It was more of

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho; communism; communist; erikrush; liberals; progressive; roanokeva; socialists

1 posted on 07/19/2012 11:52:39 PM PDT by Perseverando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

When Warren or Obama proudly announce that business did not create a building, that someone else created the building, they are highlighting their socialist belief and proud of it. They are misguided and it would be cute if such ignorance was not in power doing horrific damage to our country. It is appalling.

For a business to have contracted a builder to build the building the business and the contractor had to agree upon a trade off of mutually rewarding benefits for each party. The business gets a building and the builders get money to use where they see fit.

Once the building is finished and the contractor is paid, is the contractor still owner of the building? Does he still have a say in what is done there? No of course not. He was paid for his services therefore it is the end of the contract. Liberals believe that they own everything forever, like perpetual children that never grow up becoming responsible for themselves.

After a doctor helps give birth to a baby does he still have responsibility for the baby’s outcome? Does he have to pay for its diapers or in parenting of this child? No he got paid for his services and the parents got their baby. The liberals believe that society owns the baby forever.

After a waiter brings me the food that I order is the waiter responsible for paying for it? After all, I didn’t make it. Of course not but the Liberals believe they own all the food that others produced forever. The producers should want to give all their hard work away with no chance of getting anything for themselves. Those selfish capitalist!!

This is the perfect example of a socialist. They do not believe in ownership. They hate capitalist.

With this gang rule or community ownership of the world, there is no responsibility. This philosophy goes against the nature of man. When man is not responsible for the fruits of his labor nothing will last. If man does not own his labor he has no reason to be responsible. What would be the incentive for any individual to make any effort at all to produce goods to trade so as to sustain their own life if anyone can come in and take the fruits of their labor without trade of mutual benefit? Whether they realize it or not liberals are proponents of death and chaos.

Liberals are a high control group as is religious cults who take over people’s individuality and encourages group thought, us and them, class warfare. High control groups frown upon those who go rogue. Liberals hate those who speak outside the hoi polloi. That is why they hate El Rushbo. He represents the rogue. The rogue individual is generally the stronger of the individuals with the most confidence and the most courage. They are not afraid to stand alone. They put their capital where their mouths are. The rogues are the true capitalist.

The rogues were the group of individuals that America was born from. In destroying them you destroy America.

2 posted on 07/20/2012 12:20:03 AM PDT by jacheff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando
Joe McCarthy was right, so was Robert W. Welch Jr.


3 posted on 07/20/2012 1:13:23 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson