Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jayster

I agree serious questions are raised by the report.
The judge is right to acknowledge those questions as valid and serious.
I’m providing serious answers, or at least pointing the way thereto.

Gonna be REAL embarrassing for birthers if the defense produces the explanation I described.
That’s why I’m posting it: to give you guys a heads-up.


43 posted on 07/20/2012 4:13:14 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2

It is always good to have people question and take the other side.

I keep an open mind on this topic and when I first met Mara and we talked about the BC, I was not totally convinced.

I was not saying that the “birthers” were wrong, but that I just was not convinced.

The main thing that got me was the birth announcement in the 2 local newspapers but now I have read why it was in there and it is a very good explanation.

I don’t see the BC as a single issue/problem but as just one of the many documents that have so many questions about them.

And it is not just the documents.... it is also his younger years and who he associated with.

As far as I am concerned, you can keep asking the questions but do keep an open mind.


46 posted on 07/20/2012 4:25:34 PM PDT by Jayster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson