Skip to comments.Diverse Interest in LENR Indicates a Paradigm Shift
Posted on 07/21/2012 2:32:23 PM PDT by Kevmo
Diverse Interest in LENR Indicates a Paradigm Shift
Posted on July 18, 2012 by Admin
For many of us, our interest in cold fusion began last January, or thereabouts, when we heard about Andrea Rossi and his e-Cat. For nearly a year we followed the story waiting for Rossis big reveal in October of 2011. Unfortunately, that event was anti-climatic, and while something certainly did happen that day, we are still unsure exactly what. Yet along the way, we began to learn about new players in the game, and some old names re-emerged. Regardless, it seemed that everybody involved in this field was setting us up for that big moment, only for it never to come. Ahern disappeared in early December. NASA threw us a bone in early January, and then quickly snatched it away just as we were sinking our teeth into it. Defkalion promised to put all doubt to rest via independent testing, only to say maybe later as deadlines came and went. Arrgggg! Sometimes following this story has been truly maddening. How you people who have been following this story for more than 18 months (some for two decades) have kept your sanity is beyond me. Although, admittedly, some old-timers have shown signs of the strain and one long-time LENR expert has apparently gone stark raving mad.
Yet, in the midst of our angst, something remarkable has taken place. While many have been hoping for that one piece of evidence that they could hold up and say to the world Hey, look at this! many more than we had realized are not only paying attention, but have become active participants in the unfolding cold fusion/LENR saga.
Duck-rabbit optical illusion used to demonstrate a paradigm shift
Nowhere is this more evident in the case of National Instruments. It seems that Rossi had to petition (or beg) them for 6 months in order for them to agree work with him. Of all the things that did happen on or around October 28, 2011, one was that NI finally relented and agreed to work with AR. However, even then, Ni representative Stefano Concezzi stopped short of offering a ringing endorsement of Rossi or cold fusion, simply stating I would love for him to be right. Whatever transpired between Rossi and National instruments between late October of 2011 and later word that the two parties were no longer working together will have to remain an answered question. However, what is clear is that neither party has had anything negative to say about the relationship. Rossi has said on several occasions that their input was very helpful to him. NI has had several opportunities to distance themselves from Rossi and cold fusion and to date have not done so. In the case of cold fusion research in general, NI has in fact significantly increased its involvement and activity in the field. In a recent presentation given by Mr. Concezzi to Italian government officials in Rome, it came to light that NI is currently working with the following individuals and institutions on cold fusion/LENR projects:
Los Alamos National Laboratory Naval Research Laboratories (NRL) University of Missouri University of Texas at Austin MIT (Peter Hagelstein) Purdue University (Dr. Y.E. Kim) Kobe University Osaka University ENEA (an Italian national research laboratory) INFN (Italian National Institute for Nuclear Physics) CEA (French Atomic Energy and Alternative Energies Commission) SRI (Stanford Research Institute)
In addition, National Instruments is also sponsoring a lab at the physics department at the University of Bologna, under the guidance of Rossi associate and confident Prof. Giseppi Levi. NI also recently sent a large contingent of its staff to the University of Missouri for a cold fusion lecture by Mizzous Vice-Chancellor of Research, Dr. Robert Duncan (watch here), and will soon host a cold fusion presentation at its headquarters in Austin, TX.
According to Stefano Concezzi, the same presentation he gave to the officials of the Italian government, was also delivered to some entity of the EU. He was not specific about said group, but it may have been the European Commission, which serves as the executive body of the European Union. I say this because the European Commission itself has recently released a document advocating further research into cold fusion, and Mr. Concezzis recently released slides have the file name eu_brussels_june_20_2012_concezzi. You do the math. The document released by the EC was entitled Forward Looking Workshop on Materials for Emerging Energy Technologies , and contained an unequivocal statement regarding this technology, stating:
ENEA, SRI and NRL have been involved within review programs in the US and in Italy. The main task was to demonstrate, on the basis of signals well above the measurement uncertainties and with a cross check, the existence of the excess of heat production during electrochemical loading of deuterium in palladium cathodes. The target was achieved and the existence of the effect is no longer in doubt.
The document went on to make the following recommendations: ■ Include LENR in FP7 calls as research on materials as it has unlimited and sustainable future energy technology potential.
■ Support the study in material science as a strategic approach to achieve the control of the technology.
■ Support workshops, meetings, visiting exchanges in Europe and between European and US research institutions.
■ Focus on the fundamental research aspects because of the synergy with other disciplines.
The significance of the executive branch of the EU giving their stamp of approval to this technology cannot be understated. However, whether they follow through on the above recommendations remains an open question. But given the number of people and institutions that are now waking up to the reality of cold fusion, those who continue to drag their feet or dogmatically deny its existence are at increasing risk of being left behind, and ultimately putting themselves at a disadvantage, not only technologically but socially and economically as well.
I think many in the US government, especially in the military, are acutely aware of this. The US Navy has a two decade history of continuous cold fusion research and, as has been reported frequently here and elsewhere, NASA is taking a very active role in this technologys development. But it is not only those entities. They are many others as well, including the Naval Research Laboratory and Los Alamos National Laboratory. There is also active research being done by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). As was recently reported by the web site Next Big Future, DARPA is currently involved in a $34 study of nanotechnology and cold fusion is among the technologies being included in this study. DARPA is not new to the study of cold fusion. Agency documents from several year ago came to the conclusion There is no doubt that anomalous heat is being produced in these experiments. Yet the inclusion of cold fusion in a study of a wider range of nano-technologies, with a budget of $34 million, indicates not only a continued interest in the technology, but also an expanded one. Recent reports also suggest they are collaborating with Italian research lab ENEA on cold fusion research.
Boeing can also be added to the list of names associated with cold fusion in some capacity. According to a NASA document from May of this year, Boeing has been collaborating with the space agency regarding the feasibility of LENR-powered aircraft and space planes. The document also lists the names of quite a few employees of General Electric that were involved in the same study. It has also come to my attention via a very reliable source that another prominent American company is going beyond studies and is soon to begin its own LENR research program. Unfortunately, this is one company I am not at liberty to identify. The only thing I can say is that they are in the same league as Boeing and General Electric.
The expansion of interest of cold fusion goes still farther than than the names and institutions mentioned above. This interest has in fact reached all the way to Goliath himself, the oil industry. An article appeared covering cold fusion recently in the oil-industry publication Journal of Petroleum Technology, and was entitled On the Precipice of a New Energy Source? This article appeared in such an unexpected place that it may have gone unnoticed to most not involved in that industry, save for the fact that one of the co-authors contacted Frank Acland at E-Cat World and informed him of it, stating:
I am from the petroleum industry and LENR is now being watched closely. An article was just published in the July Journal of Petroleum Technology. I authored it. LENR is definitely on the radar.
What is also interesting about the article, besides sounding the call to the rest of the oil-industry that they had better pay attention to this, is the fact that the article was authored by David J. Nagel, one-time cold fusion researcher, CEO of the cold fusion company NUCAT Energy, and retired from the US Naval Research Laboratory. There is strong evidence that he was a party to independent testing of Defkalions Hyperion, as DGT publicly posted photos of the testing with his name attached to them. The mind wonders at what exactly he knows and what he told individuals involved in the petroleum industry. Whatever it was, it certainly grabbed their attention.
Regarding mainstream news coverage, reports have also come out of the recent ILENR in conference in Virgnia that a writer for the magazine Popular Science was in attendance and is currently writing a 8-page article on cold fusion/LENR for that publication. In addition, Americas premier business network, CNBC, just re-aired the 60 Minutes segment from 2009 Cold Fusion is Hot Again. The interesting thing about this is that the program aired in what is considered Prime Time for television viewing, 9:00 p.m. Also, the segment aired alongside, and actually preceded, a story about the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, which right now is the darling of the scientific community due to recent discoveries regarding the elusive Higgs boson.
As a final illustration as to how the nature of the conversation has changed in the last 7 months, let us go back to Dr. Brian Ahern, who was mentioned at outset of this article. He announced in the late fall of 2011 that he would give an LENR presentation that would convince even the most skeptical LENR critic of the reality of the technology. This created quite a bit of excitement and buzz, and many eagerly awaited his planned December 7 presentation. He subsequently canceled his presentation at the last minute and created disappointment among many, and a perverse joy amongst critics and Pathoskeps. Well, Dr. Ahern is giving a similar presentation this very day, perhaps even as this is being written. The venue has changed from a fringe conference on the outskirts of New York City, to a more prominent forum, the New Energy Symposium, in the heart of NYC at 7 World Trade Center. While in late 2011 this may have been a focal, even crucial, presentation, right now it is just another in a long line of ongoing disclosures. Dont get me wrong, it may in hindsight turn out to be important and I certainly wish him luck and hope things go well. However, whether the presentation is a great success, or even occurs at all, it will not have nearly to the impact it would have had just 7 months ago. The fact is cold fusion/LENR research and interest is now expanding rapidly beyond the ability of one person or one event to have a significant impact on the overall narrative, whether it be Andrea Rossi or Brian Ahern. Things have changed indeed.
The Cold Fusion/LENR Ping List
A guess of Martin Marietta. They are not simply aggregate and concrete.
Me not understand
Me neither. ??
Cold fusion is still a promising energy source of clean, cheap energy, but it remains the pipe dream it has since someone first thought “why can’t we duplicate the power of the sun here on earth”.
People gave up on cold fusion to use to supply energy for our homes, airplanes, cars, machines, & etc.
Fast forward to 2011, and one guy claims he got more energy from a cold fusion process than he put into. Prior to that, you had to put more energy into creating fusion than you got out of it, which is good for nothing.
Now that someone finally got a tiny more energy out of some powdered nickel than they put into it, some major players have put this technology back on their radar.
Basically, most of the energy experts in science and business have gone from “that is flat impossible” to “well, OK, it MIGHT be promising and maybe someday in the far off future we’ll have something that can compete with oil and coal and nuclear”.
I hope cold fusion works. (LENR is Low Energy Nuclear Reaction). It would revolutionize the earth, bringing clean energy to every remote backwater of the earth. You could power your home on site with no losses from transmission lines and you would not have to have a smart meter because you would be refueling the machine in your home closet. You could power stand alone computers. You could have electric cars because LENR cold fusion would power your car from on-board fuel instead of charging with electricity from a grid.
LENR changes everything if it works.
In the meantime, nobody on the planet knows today if this will supply sufficient current for adequate duration at practical costs.
It is a pipe dream that wend from “no way”, to “well, maybe and maybe not but I wouldn’t get too excited about it because we still have long way to go before we know anything here.”
Not quite true. Rossi got out the gate with the biggest energy output demo, and thus broke the dam of silence that has surrounded LENR since shortly after Pons/Fleischmann. But MANY other researchers have published reports with results of positive experimental results, both with Pd/D2 and Ni/H2 systems. At least some of them have energy outputs at a comparable watts/gram level to Rossi, but they are typically working with much smaller reaction systems, so the absolute wattage is significantly less.