[Alberta's Child]

I would agree with you on that point, but there's an obvious flaw in your argument. Your point is a perfectly legitimate defense of a company like Cinemark if they did nothing to deter a loony-tune from entering the theater and shooting dozens of people. Because let's be honest here -- there simply isn't any way for a business to ensure that all of its customers are fully protected from each other.

However, when a company issues a stated policy of restricting law-abiding gun owners from bringing weapons into their place of business, they have effectively taken upon themselves the responsibility of keeping their customers safe.

So -- yeah, I think Cinemark is going to be sued out of existence. And rightfully so, if they do in fact have a documented policy prohibiting people from carrying weapons into their place of busines.

[Sherman Logan]

I will wager a rather large sum of money that the issue over which they are sued is failure to keep the perp and his weapons out, not their policy of prohibiting concealed carry by patrons.