[NoGrayZone]

"Yeah, but if he is inventing named sources, what does that say about the veracity of his unnamed source?"

Perhaps he is the insider himself? You can't only read the Ulsterman report....you must also read the comments.

There are very talented people who figure out and post links to what the "insider/s" is trying to say, without saying it. Kind of like a bread trail. Sometimes, they come right out and say it, sometimes just clues.

The comments after the Ulsterman report, to me, are most important. They connect the dots.

barry...."the one who calls himself Barack" has a longer "dead now" trail than the clintons.

[dirtboy]

Perhaps he is the insider himself? You can't only read the Ulsterman report....you must also read the comments.

For what? Discussion about an unnamed source via an unhinged blogger? Anthony Martin re-invents the term 'legend in his own mind' - just to get blog hits. The truth about Obama is bad enough, no need to invent stories unless you have your own motivations for such - such as generating blog traffic.