Feinstein: Election year not ideal for gun debate

Associated Press ^ | July 22, 2012

[LaybackLenny]

Aw, c'mon Di-Fi, go for it.

No, REALLY...go for it.

Let's have a serious debate about EMASCULATING THE CONSTITUTION.

I mean, what's the worst that can happen? Maybe YOU GUYS lose your collective asses in November?

Well, worst for you maybe. As for me...:)

Yeah Diane, let's "throw down"...no time like the present.

[BobL]

“His explosives were illegal... but we are going to discuss guns...”

Actually, judging from WiFi’s words herself, the LAST THING that the Democrats want right now is a discussion about guns. They have enough on their table just to keep from getting cleaned out as it is.

[ZULU]

Translation:

We will try AGAIN to screw the American public out of yet another Constitutional Right AFTER the election.

She doesn’t approve of any weapon she can’t hide in her purse.

These elitist bastards of both sexes in both parties who continue to get elected to an office they view as a personal sinecure are a menace to the Republic.

We need term limits or an electorate intelligent enough to deprive them of their “Titles of Nobility” after two terms.

Frankenfeinstein should be out out to pasture with her Bolshevik colleagues like Frank Lautenberg et al.

[catnipman]

“Translation: We know we’ll lose our asses if we even attempt to pass gun legislation this close to the election.”

Yes. And after the election, any stealth gun-controllers who manage to fool the public and get re-elected will have some “breathing-room” for “flexibility”