Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Energy-efficient CFL bulbs cause skin damage, say researchers
The Daily Caller ^

Posted on 07/23/2012 9:28:46 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Energy-efficient CFL bulbs cause skin damage, say researchers 8:52 AM 07/23/2012 ADVERTISEMENT

New research funded by the National Science Foundation has scientists warning consumers about the potentially harmful effects energy-saving CFL light bulbs can have on skin.

The warning comes based on a study conducted by Stony Brook University and New York State Stem Cell Science — published in the June issue of Photochemistry and Photobiology — which looked at whether and how the invisible UV rays CFL bulbs emit affect the skin.

Based on the research, scientists concluded that CFL light bulbs can be harmful to healthy skin cells.

“Our study revealed that the response of healthy skin cells to UV emitted from CFL bulbs is consistent with damage from ultraviolet radiation,” said lead researcher Miriam Rafailovich, Professor of Materials Science and Engineering at Stony Brook University, in New York, in a statement. “Skin cell damage was further enhanced when low dosages of TiO2 nanoparticles were introduced to the skin cells prior to exposure.”

According to Rafailovich, with or without TiO2 (a chemical found in sunblock), incandescent bulbs of the same light intensity had zero effects on healthy skin.

The scientists found that cracks in the CFL bulbs phosphor coatings yielded significant levels of UVC and UVA in all of the bulbs — purchased in different locations across two counties — they examined.

With high levels of ultraviolet radiation present, the researchers delved into how the exposure affected the skin. According to the findings, skin damage from exposure to CFLs was consistent with harm caused by ultraviolet radiation.

“Despite their large energy savings, consumers should be careful when using compact fluorescent light bulbs,” said Rafailovich. “Our research shows that it is best to avoid using them at close distances and that they are safest when placed behind an additional glass cover.”

The research was inspired by a similar 2008 European study conducted by the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks which found a potential for skin damage and suggested the use of double-enveloped bulbs as a mitigation tool.

CFLs have been the source of political rumblings since 2007 when Congress approved new energy standards that would have started to phase out the traditional incandescent light bulb in favor of the energy-efficient CFL bulb this year. In December, Congress offered a provision to prevent the Department of Energy from enforcing the standards for nine months. The regulation is still on the books.

The restriction on consumer choice has represented a political battle cry for Tea Partiers and conservatives alike who view the regulation as an infringement on individual liberty. Environmentalists and CFL proponents argue the bulbs are environmentally friendly and economically efficient


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: envirowhackos; health; lightbulbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: palmer; ArrogantBustard

Okay, I stand corrected and apologize to Bustard for misreading his post.

Enjoy the rest of your day.


21 posted on 07/23/2012 10:42:38 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

I like the LED bulbs, they don’t get as hot so my AC doesn;t have to work so hard against them...


22 posted on 07/23/2012 11:06:39 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

No offense taken ...

These bad science articles really annoy me.


23 posted on 07/23/2012 11:16:17 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Quick...think of ONE thing congress passed that Bush vetoed.

Then think of all the things he DID do that were detrimental to our country, especially in the Middle East.

And the TSA, Homeland Security, Patriot Act, and on and on and......

24 posted on 07/23/2012 11:34:09 AM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: diogenes ghost
Then think of all the things he DID do that were detrimental to our country, especially in the Middle East.

Hmmm ....

If you think that disposing of the Taliban and Saddam Hussein were bad, that's your business. I disagree.

As for the rest ...

Bush was often foolish.

Bam-Bam is evil.

25 posted on 07/23/2012 11:37:59 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

I like the LED bulbs, they don’t get as hot so my AC doesn;t have to work so hard against them...

* * *

I am starting to like LED bulbs too. I have a couple of LED flashlights which my kids have NOT managed to break, unlike all the incandescent bulb flashlights before them.

(But CFLs still suck! ;o)


26 posted on 07/23/2012 11:42:09 AM PDT by Hetty_Fauxvert ( "Be Breitbart, baby!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

Yes. They all emit UV, so unless they have diffusers (e.g. an additional glass cover, as described in the article), they are doing a modest amount of damage. However, it is pretty negligible:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorescent_lamp#Ultraviolet_emission


27 posted on 07/23/2012 11:42:27 AM PDT by fluorescence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence

The link from that section (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1343229) suggests that long-term exposure raises a person’s lifetime skin cancer risk by 3.9%.


28 posted on 07/23/2012 11:47:58 AM PDT by fluorescence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
...Unanswered questions: What intensity of UV radiation is emitted by CFL? How does that intensity compare to conventional tube fluorescent lights? How does that intensity compare to a day at the beach?

Enquiring minds (at least, the ones who paid attention in science class) want to know.


And ... how do conventional tube fluorescent lights of the past made in the US compare to CLF's from China the land of quality fade where anti freeze finds its way into toothpaste and cough medicine and plastic bits find their way into infant formula and the ingredients for pet food.
29 posted on 07/23/2012 12:06:39 PM PDT by khelus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

I have an LED in the lamp beside my chair, very bright, and no heat, so when I fumble around to turn off the light, I don’t burn myself.

We have changed our family room flood lights to LED, put in a dimmer for them. Our hallway light is a natural light LED, extremely bright and white.


30 posted on 07/23/2012 12:13:06 PM PDT by ican'tbelieveit (School is prison for children who have commited the crime of being born. (attr: St_Thomas_Aquinas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

Here’s my concern:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2909625/posts?page=29#29


31 posted on 07/23/2012 12:15:13 PM PDT by khelus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

later


32 posted on 07/23/2012 12:17:10 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: khelus

Most lamps have shades. Would glass really be necessary to shade from the UV radiation, or are shades enough?

I agree with you on that point as well, helus. There’s no QC in China nor when the products reach our shores. The design companies can blame the manufacturing process despite their poor QC.


33 posted on 07/23/2012 12:20:50 PM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ican'tbelieveit

[ I have an LED in the lamp beside my chair, very bright, and no heat, so when I fumble around to turn off the light, I don’t burn myself.

We have changed our family room flood lights to LED, put in a dimmer for them. Our hallway light is a natural light LED, extremely bright and white. ]

Where I live it gets cold, so I like the LED lights as a replacement for flood lights because the LEDs handle extreme cold temps far far better than CFLs or even regular light bulbs.


34 posted on 07/23/2012 12:34:29 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CVLa_tRslY


35 posted on 07/23/2012 12:36:40 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; TheOldLady; WildHighlander57; netmilsmom; tomdavidd; Freeper; Gvl_M3; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

.

36 posted on 07/23/2012 1:55:10 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
"If you think that disposing of the Taliban and Saddam Hussein were bad, that's your business. I disagree."

Disposed of the Taliban? Really? Then who is killing so many young soldiers? And who will control the country when we leave? Just what in hell have we gained?

Disposed of Saddam Hussein...yup, we did. But just what US interests required that? What did we gain by 'nation building' at the cost of so much blood and treasure?

In hindsight, would you want to repeat either adventure?

37 posted on 07/23/2012 2:04:04 PM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rarestia
Most lamps have shades. Would glass really be necessary to shade from the UV radiation, or are shades enough? ...

Interesting question. IIRC some cloth and some glass can offer some protection, but I don't know how much protection and what affects the amount of protection offered. Perhaps someone with more expertise in UV radiation an answer.
38 posted on 07/23/2012 2:08:52 PM PDT by khelus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: khelus

My only experience with lamp shades came during spring break in college, and I can assure you that I had quite the sunburn despite wearing that lampshade for a majority of the day.

The hotel was not amused and that was reflected in the bill for incidentals when we checked out.


39 posted on 07/23/2012 2:16:42 PM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

ROFL


40 posted on 07/23/2012 2:53:26 PM PDT by khelus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson