Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: narses

ummmm....okay.

Now can we have some context?
(Just askin’...lol)


5 posted on 07/23/2012 8:55:30 PM PDT by Hazelwood Redneck Brain Trust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hazelwood Redneck Brain Trust
*** ummmm....okay. ~~ Now can we have some context? ~~ (Just askin’...lol) ***

Scroll down to post number eight. There's your 'context'.
Better still I'll save you the time, here:
S-R must provide info on anonymous commenter (Idaho) July 10, 2012 | Thomas Clouse

And to save you more time, here's the Reader's Digest condensed version:

Judge rules no one posting on the Internet is really anonymous. Screen Names mean squat and be careful of what you post about 'public figures'.

You were in in June so you should have seen the thread, it's pretty important and pertinent to FReepers. There were other threads besides this one on this Judge's ruling.

9 posted on 07/24/2012 7:37:15 AM PDT by Condor51 (Never mess with an old man. He won't fight you he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson