Posted on 07/23/2012 9:21:28 PM PDT by Fred Garvin-MP
Hello. My name is Fred Garvin-MP. I recently watched the Maricopa County Sheriff Department's press conference. It was intriguing to say the least. What caught my attention were the coding numbers on the document put on the White House server for all Americans to see. The code #9 was the essential 'nail in the coffin' that confirmed the PDF version of the birth certificate was a 'definite' forgery.
Now two pro Obama websites claim that lead Investigator Mike Zullo used the meaning of code #9 from a 1969 Vital Statistics Instruction Manual instead of a manual from 1961. Is this true? One meaning for code #9 is different that the other code #9 and that is giving Obama supporting websites ammunition to claim Sheriff Arpaio's Cold Case Posse got it wrong. To clear this up we need answers. I am sure most of you agree.
Here is the 1961 layout: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/vsus_1961_1.pdf
Here is the 1969 layout : http://www.nber.org/natality/1969/Nat1969-71doc.pdf
Fred Garvin-MP
I thought the de-coding of the #9 was achieved through discussion with VK Lee who actually signed the document?
what of the “Little Buttercup” connection, that 95 year old lady who explained how she had coded them in the day? she didn’t cite a manual did she?
As I recall from watching the same conference, Zullo did mention two different codes and they had to find the one for the time the BC was generated.
The other thing is why would you believe anything coming from a pro-Obama site in the first place?
Smoke and Mirrors! Fog the issue! change the subject. That is what the left does!
I got into a discussion about this on this thread and I saw no coding explained whatsoever in that file.
If I missed it I sure would appreciate you telling me which page it's on.
Yes we need answers. And if possible debunk the debunkers.
Just so you know....there is a technique used by the left. It is called BenSmithing. Basically what they do is when we on the right come up with a story that makes the left look bad, they then do a “so called” investigation on it and in their investigation they either lie or distort the facts but then everyone refers back the the investigation/story as being factual.
Look it up....kinda interesting.
Yes, Ben Smith is the one that started it.
Don’t be too happy. fFed Garvin- Male Prostitute was a Dan Ackroyd charecter from the old Saturday Night Live program.
Also, 07/08/12 as your date joining FreeRepublic? Sniff, sniff . . . . . . get my drift?
One of those pro-Obama sites uses a document that allegedly describes the race codes for 1960-1961, except that the Natality Report for 1960 reports that race was more simply classified than it was in 1961 ... and the pro-Obama document source is from an agency that wasn’t created until 1963. We know that Obama has had documents forged on his behalf (see the Bomford birth certificate), so the legitimacy of this code document is suspect at best.
It would be nice to see it also for comparison instead of something completely different, which is what your first link is IMO, and has nothing whatsoever about the coding therein like your second link does that I can see.
When they show me a document explaining that a #9 code for race means “African”, than I will be impressed.
From what I gathered watching the news conference Mike Zullo used the meaning of code #9 from a 1961 but whoever forged the birth certificate was going by a more recent code system not yet developed at the time of Obama’s Birth.
Surely that’s not how Negro was denoted at the time?
The Number 9 in the year 1962 means “Male Prostitute”
I think "Negro" may have been used in the 1960s.
Amazing that Obama wishes to talk about the details in his Birth Certificate but fails to release the authentic and legitimate one. It’s on microfiche. All he has to do is allow the investigators to look at it and it’s over. Finished. Case closed (for one side or the other).
In the south the word was “niggra” or “colored”. In the sixties the blacks started asking “Who are colored people?” I thought that was pretty slick of them.
Correct, Zullo made mention that the “African” race designation was not used until 1968.
Do we have a troll amongst us? I mean if Fred really wanted to know, wouldn’t he/she/it have just read both documents and reported just where he/she/it found the discrepancies? Never mind all of the other problems with that one section alone. Obviously this particular point has someone very exercised at the moment.
Or did he use Code 9 from Outer Space?
Sorry, I could not resist.
(I’m a birther)
Please don’t say sniff, sniff when talking about Fred.
Not with his urban dictionary entry.....
http://www.urbandictionary.com/author.php?author=Fred+Garvin+MP
Just. Please. Don’t.
That MP surely does not mean Member of Parliament.
I too smell grody troll with underwear fungus.
Welcome to FReeRepublic. We hope you will enjoy your experience here.
It is always beneficial that FReepers fill out their homepage so fellow readers will know a little about you and add the State you are from.
Enjoy
The father’s race, if it was legitimately entered as “African” most likely would have been coded as 2 - Black. The vital statistics report said: “a reported mixture of Negro with any other race is included in the Negro group” ... I’m pretty sure that if the Hawaiian registrar saw African on a birth certificate, they would have assumed it was Negro and would have coded it as No. 2.
There are a few gay blades on FR, but they sure don’t swish those blades in others’ faces. That’s a way to get pounced on with twenty feline claws in a hurry.
Did you watch the press conference?
Honestly, it wouldn’t even matter much which one they used as the term “African” would never have been used in that square in 1961. It becomes more concerning when one compares the #9 from the earlier manual (the one in use at the time) because it indicates “No Information Given”, which means that square should have been EMPTY, same with the other square.
BTW: Welcome to FR!
May I inquire what the “MP” stands for? Military Police, or something else?
PING to the thread...
not going to look through 246 pages of tables to try and figure out what he is talking about
Is it Moderator, Administrator or what that we report this stuff to? The next signature is our buddy Fred has not come back to make any counter points. Unusual for someone asking us for answers.
It might also be of interest to note - are these the SPECIFIC HAWAIIAN codes? Hawaii was in a different system during the time they were transitioning, IIRC. You need to look at the specific Hawaiian code indexes. (I tried to look at the CDC link, but it was taking forever to download.)
BTW: I totally agree with you - I smell ozone like crazy off of this one...
i believe this is troll exterminator central? surely a Male Prostitute (see Urban Dictionary) can join some raccoons in their oblivion?
Puts hair on your chest to post and then reply.
The same thing goes for FATHER'S EDUCATION - DETAIL Same code structure as Mother's Detail Education (pgs 16 and 17)
What should the code number be for his education according to the 69-71 coding if that is what was used as a reference?
Just curious and I'm far from knowledgeable on this whole coding thingy. It's all so much harder to figure it out when one doesn't have it all nice and neat like with your 69-71 link.
you’re more manly than that troll, ma’am!
Is your retirement a defined pension or defined benefit? Just wondering.
My little brother was born in Los Angeles County, CA in 1961. Where it says 'race of father' on his bc, it says 'negro'.
Some politically correct forger inserted 'African' on Obie's bc. No one would have put that on an American child's bc in 1961.
I highly doubt if anyone would today.
Obama knows all about this and doesn’t even care. It’s like “ha ha ha, I punked you, now you should have known better to ask for it Naughty America!”
To clear this up we need answers. I am sure most of you agree.
Yes answers would be nice, why not ask the CCP?
Here we can only speculate without more information. It does look like they may have made an error without having more information to go on. If so IMO htey should own up to it. These things happen in complex investigations, I doubt it was intentional as that would be foolish.
The other side is putting out a bunch of nonsense that other things have been debunked and IMO have not.
OJ still did it even if the glove did not fit. Its one piece of a ton of evidence.
Seems these two "pro Obama websites" are just making a @WAG. (snicker...'windage')
lol
Only members of the Royal Order of the Freeperhood can post without replying.
I wouldn't be so sure. Inserting the word 'African' in the blank for 'race of father' was a blunder of monumental proportions, and all the little henchmen in Obie's cabal know it.
I can guarantee you, they were none too pleased when they all realized the mistake.
Their people's forging skills haven't gotten any better, though. Some fool forgot to flatten the image, and left all sorts of telltale marks, when they created Obama's LFBC. Rank amateurs...
I’m curious as to how your trusses are staying up? Is Slick still your pimp? That’s a mighty long career you’ve had, you know you didn’t build that right?
Definitely zot bait here...
Just sayin'...
That is the correct date I joined. I haven’t made a thread until now.
It says my posts have to be checked by a moderator before being posted. That is why I am having a delay answering you.
Is it possible the CCP used the Hawaiian Codes then?
Thank you for that reply.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.