Skip to comments.Every second rape convicted is a foreigner (Muslims in Denmark)
Posted on 07/24/2012 8:57:32 AM PDT by Milagros
Every second rape convicted is a foreigner By Lars Fogt Sunday, July 22, 2012
More than half of those who were convicted of rape in 2010 were immigrants or descendants of immigrants. (Foto: Jeppe Bøje Nielsen) (Photo: Jeppe Nielsen Buoy)
Iraqis, Iranians, Turks and Somalis are dramatically overrepresented in rape convictions in Denmark.
More than every second time judges in 2010 took deed men guilty of rape, was the culprit immigrants or descendants of foreigners, official figures from Statistics Denmark.
Exactly was 32 with a Danish background in 2010, convicted of rape against 27 migrants and 7 descendants of immigrants, totaling 34th
Shocked Taking rape sentencing of the last seven years is more than one out of three convicted of rape either immigrant or descendant - exactly means 156 of the 450 rape convicted since 2004 immigrant background.
As immigrants and their descendants accounts for barely ten percent of the Danish population - are thus more than three times as many people with foreign backgrounds who are convicted of rape in relation to the...
(Excerpt) Read more at translate.google.com ...
Danish police: Immigrant criminals target Danes to make them move out of the (Muslim) area On January 24, 2012 By Nicolai Sennels
Muslims; right to rob non-Muslims has been established since their prophet (always "their", not "the") attracted fighters by allowing booty and rape when attacking non-Muslims. An anonymous Danish police officer now says that "immigrant" criminals are targeting non-Muslims because they want them to leave the area. http://theunitedwest.org/danish-police-immigrant-criminals-target-danes-to-make-them-move-out-of-the-muslim-area/
There’s more than one way to infiltrate and take over a country.
Now click our heels three times kids and repeat after me...
“Diversity is our strength...”
“Diversity is our strength...”
“Diversity is our strength...”
Goodbye Europe. Coming to the United States soon.
We are asked to have over-the-top tolerance to those that preach/act intolerance...
“As immigrants and their descendants accounts for barely ten percent of the Danish population.”
Then they are in MUCH better shape than the US.
Notice the commonality of the demands of “tolerance” from Mohammadans, Gays, Ultraleftists, OWS’ers, Peaceniks, anti-Christians, et al...
I think we’re long past time to give back to them EVERYTHING they have coming... and more.
...and it's "Perfect Specimen and Founder" (the psychotic, murering, pederast, thug, Moo-Ham-Ud) who ALL Muslims are encouraged to "Emulate" in EVERY respect.
It is against Islam to rape Muslim women, but Muhammad actually encouraged the rape of others captured in battle. This hadith provides the context for the Quranic verse (4:24):
Actually, as the hadith indicates, it wasn't Muhammad, but "Allah the Exalted" who told the men to rape the women in front of their husbands - which is all the more reason not to think of Islam as being the same as other religion.
Note also that the husbands of these unfortunate victims were obviously alive after battle. This is important because it flatly contradicts those apologists who like to argue that the women Muhammad enslaved were widowed and thus unable to fend for themselves. (Even if the apologists were right, what sort of a moral code is it that forces a widow to choose between being raped and starving?)
There are several other episodes in which Muhammad is offered the clear opportunity to disavow raping women - yet he instead offers advice on how to proceed. In one case, his men were reluctant to devalue their new slaves for later resale by getting them pregnant. Muhammad was asked about coitus interruptus in particular:
As indicated, the prophet of Islam did not mind his men raping the women, provided they ejaculated within the bodies of their victims.
As one might imagine, Muhammad's obvious approval of raping women captured in battle and his own personal participation as recorded in many places is of intense inconvenience to the Muslim apologists of our time.
For this reason, some of them attempt to explain away these many episodes and Qur'anic references to sex with captives by pretending that these are cases in which women have fled bad marriages and sought refuge with the Muslims. Some apologists even refer to them as "wives," even though the Qur'an makes a clear distinction between "those whom thy right hand possesses" and true wives (see Sura 33:50).
Beyond the desperation of the 21st century apologist however, there is absolutely nothing in the historical text that supports this rosy revision of Muslim history. The women of the Banu Mustaliq were sold into slavery following their rape:
In fact, female slaves were traded like any other simple commodity by Muhammad and his bad of devoted followers:
Is it Islamic to sell one's wife for horses? Clearly these were not wives!
More importantly, by definition a "captured" woman is not one who is fleeing her husband. She is fleeing her captor (ie. the Muslim slave raider). This hadith describes a typical raid, in which the women and children are captured as they are attempting to flee the attacking Muslims:
The Muslim narrator (who happens to be Muhammad's adopted son) sees the women trying to escape (following the massacre of their men) and cuts off their route by shooting an arrow into their path. These aren't women trying to seek refuge with the Muslims. They are trying to avoid capture by the Muslims.
The same hadith goes on to recount that Muhammad personally demanded one of the captured women for his own use:
The prophet of Islam and his companions used war to collect women for personal sexual use and for trading. Unless she was arbitrarily declared as someone's wife, the woman became a sex slave. In no case was her fate tied to anything that she had personally done, nor was she given a choice about her future.
That is almost every other crime...they are 12% of the population.
Civilized people must respond to the attacks from the feral types everywhere.
Aint diversity great?
What is fun to see in this mess is that countries that historically have called America racist, are beginning to get a look at how well their countries can handle what America has been dealing with for 250 years.
These countries like England and Sweden had a mostly Caucasian population and they sat back and took the side of the downtrodden minorities. Now they are getting a taste of the real problems, and they don’t have a clue as to how to handle it.
Diversity is only a strength when the differences are superficial and harmless, things like skin color, wearing silly hats, singing weirds songs etc...
When the other group wants to stone people and chop their heads off and dominate any culture through terror, then it is not diversity it is cultural suicide.
“These countries like England and Sweden had a mostly Caucasian population and they sat back and took the side of the downtrodden minorities.”
Whitey McCracker-Honkey took their side because the ancient Greeks idealized poverty as a virtue. This later influenced Christian thinking. Leftist then took it and twisted it to their own ends.
We even have that ideal engraved in the form of a poem by Emma Lazarus on a tablet on the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty.
‘With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,’
I forgot to include the rest of the poem.
‘The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”’
And this is what the Leftists are doing today. They are taking that ideal and allowing in every diseased wastrel from as many Third World countries as possible and signing them up for any and all entitlement programs.
Bankrupt morals and ethics of a nation leads to bankruptcy of its economy.
Geez. As if being raped once is not bad enough.
These huddled masses 100 years ago learned to speak English, and they worked hard to become Americans.
But if you read those words today they sound like a Leftists wet dream for more entitlement spending!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.