Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cost-Effective Medical Treatments Bringing Out the Trial Lawyers ^ | July 26, 2012 | Brian McNicoll

Posted on 07/26/2012 7:36:07 AM PDT by Kaslin

One of my first employers after I moved to Washington, D.C., enrolled us in a Kaiser health maintenance organization. I loved it. I thought it was effective and efficient, convenient and caring.

I was young then. I didn’t know a doctor and didn’t want to know one. My medical issues involved basketball and softball injuries. I needed a quickie X-ray, a pain pill, a brace and a nice form to sign.

But it wasn’t to last. Even then, in the early 1990s, HMOs had become controversial. I wanted my healthcare to be impersonal, but others with more complicated medical needs didn’t. They complained of vending-machine medicine – uncaring, unresponsive, error-prone, focused to an unhealthy degree on cost-containment. The estrangement led to bitterness, the bitterness to piling on by the unwitting media. The media reports, of course, attracted trial lawyers like blood attracts sharks.

By the late-‘90s, corporations were scrambling to get out of the HMO business. A few survived, and there is some evidence the concept is making a comeback. Turns out HMOs had a pretty good business model and did not have a monopoly on uncaring, unresponsive, error-prone medicine.

Today, the same thing is happening with dentistry. Traditional dentists have even less incentive to deal with transient customers, such as the younger me, Medicaid patients and others who seem unlikely to become lucrative and permanent customers. They aren’t often asked to save lives on an emergency basis, so they can pick and choose. And they do.

As a result, a lot of people end up without dental coverage – three times as many kids lack dental coverage as lack health insurance. And since a lot higher percentage of dental bills are paid out of pocket – 40 percent for dentistry, 10 percent for the rest of healthcare – poor kids often miss out.

The dangers of missing out go beyond a little extra brown on the teeth as well. A missing tooth can be the difference between a life in the professions and one spent scrambling to make ends meet in dead-end jobs. Moreover, kids who don’t visit dentists miss school more, access emergency-room care for dental problems far more and run higher risks of diseases such as heart disease, stroke, arteriosclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes. Mothers who grew up without proper dental care are significantly less likely to carry children to term.

And every so often, somebody dies.

It happened in Maryland in 2009. Deamonte Driver, a 12-year-old boy, died when an infection that started in his tooth spread to his brain. His mother tried to find a dentist to treat him but couldn’t because fewer than 1 in 5 today will accept Medicaid patients.

Congress responded by adding a dental benefit to the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and tailored the legislation to encourage the development of Dental Management Service Organizations – DMSOs – which function basically as HMOs for dental care. DMSOs have figured out a way to do something traditional dentists have not – turn a profit treating those transient customers, particularly disadvantaged children.

Basically, management companies buy up dental practices and bring economies of scale into play. They purchase in bulk, manage for efficiency and survive on the low reimbursement rates of Medicaid. The chains they’ve created are growing in notoriety – Kool Smiles, All Smiles, Reachout American and Aspen are among the big brand names.

It’s working. There are two ways you can tell. The first is a recent Pew study that shows more poor kids are getting to see dentists, fewer are missing school over dental problems and more Medicaid patients are getting regular care. Maryland, which had a bad record on children’s dental health before the Driver tragedy, now gets an A from the Pew study of children’s dental health.

The other way you can tell is that the sharks are out. Trial lawyers are trolling for clients … actively encouraging people to find something wrong with the dental work they had done at a DMSO and sue the firms. One firm, Moriarity-Leyendecker in Houston, devotes its Facebook page to condemnation of all things DMSO.A website called, hosted by someone claiming to be a grandmother who became enraged at news reports, delivers shrill, crude and suspiciously targeted attacks on the industry. It took to task the mayor of Dallas last year for allowing All Smiles to give free dental exams at a back-to-school event the city holds each year. It actively solicits embittered former employees of DMSOs to report wrongdoing. It is curiously uninterested in such complaints from former staffers of traditional suburban dentists.

DMSOs are where HMOs were back in the ‘90s. They’ve figured out a new way to profitably deliver dental care to patients who otherwise may well go untreated. They are new and still trying to earn the trust of customers, and a few bad apples have made this even more difficult. There are a few business practices that will have to be adjusted – incentivizing volume when it comes to government-paid healthcare is not conducive to good publicity.

But the answer is to fix the industry, not destroy it. Quality dental care is financially out of reach for more Americans now than ever before, and DMSOs are bringing quality care to millions of American children who could not otherwise access it.

Be wary of the way the media presents these businesses. The TV reports are suspiciously similar. A high-volume clinic is shown. An entrenched family dentist who wouldn’t serve any of those patients on a bet is asked if this clinic is operating properly. “No, it’s not,” he intones. “This is tragic.” It’s tragic, all right. It’s tragic that a niche of the massive dental industry, one that exists solely to serve the underprivileged, is under attacks such as these.

But that’s what happens when you start to have a little success.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government

1 posted on 07/26/2012 7:36:16 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
From Theodore Roosevelt's 1910 speech at the Sarbonne:
There is no more unhealthy being, no man less worthy of respect, than he who either really holds, or feigns to hold, an attitude of sneering disbelief toward all that is great and lofty, whether in achievement or in that noble effort which, even if it fails, comes to second achievement. A cynical habit of thought and speech, a readiness to criticise work which the critic himself never tries to perform, an intellectual aloofness which will not accept contact with life's realities - all these are marks, not as the possessor would fain to think, of superiority but of weakness. They mark the men unfit to bear their part painfully in the stern strife of living, who seek, in the affection of contempt for the achievements of others, to hide from others and from themselves in their own weakness. The rôle is easy; there is none easier, save only the rôle of the man who sneers alike at both criticism and performance.

It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.

2 posted on 07/26/2012 7:51:18 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which “liberalism" coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I remember that story about the kid who died. He had several dental appointments scheduled, but the mother kept “no-showing” for the appointments. I’ve worked in several offices that accept medical assistance. At least 50% of the patients do not show up for their scheduled appointments. Offices routinely double book appointments with medical assistance patients. Sometimes, they will set aside a whole day where they will only see M.A. patients. In fact, this is quite typical, since the M.A. patients tend to “scare away” the “regular” patients.

3 posted on 07/26/2012 9:52:21 AM PDT by toothfairy86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It seems to me, that with an initial and follow-up evaluation from a dentist, that it might be possible to make a “dental maintenance robot”. While it might do some tasks like tartar removal, it would also use special light and fiber optics to detect tooth flaws, infections, stresses and who knows what else, better than the human eye could spot.

4 posted on 07/26/2012 10:23:11 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
A cynical habit of thought and speech, a readiness to criticise work which the critic himself never tries to perform...

Nice quote, and people who are like this make me sick to my stomach!

5 posted on 07/26/2012 11:03:48 AM PDT by rdb3 (We need Ward Cleaver for President. We already have Eddie Haskell. (ATB))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I had read that the latest, greatest treatment for dentistry, will put dentists out of business. They have bio-engineered a bacteria, which will “out compete” the bacteria in your mouth that causes damage to the enamel of your teeth. Essentially it kills off the bacteria that cause tooth decay, and is undergoing state 3 human trials. As I understand it, it will be available within a few years, provided it turns out to be safe.

6 posted on 07/26/2012 11:41:34 AM PDT by krogers58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Locally, dentists are whining that kids under the age of 6 MUST see their dentist every 6 months & get major work.....

7 posted on 07/26/2012 12:11:25 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson