Posted on 07/27/2012 7:12:30 PM PDT by RummyChick
defence lawyers argued that Holmes’ constitutional rights had been violated by the “breach of confidentiality and privilege” and sought “sanctions for this misconduct”.
They hide behind this and feel no remorse knowing thier patient caused the murder of innocent people. They are accomplaces and we need to know the danger. These doctors have blood on thier hands. breach of confidentiality
when it comes to harming others infringes on the rights of the victims
he is human. But i suspect he was raised on chemicals and neglect.
More crap from the people who make saving endangered snails a federal priority. Thanks to "privacy" laws, we learn a great deal more about victims than we do about criminals, even those who commit the most horrific crimes. The result is that we are unable to take reasonable measures to protect decent citizens since we are left with no idea of what to look out for in the future.
De 21: 18 If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who does not obey his father and mother and will not listen to them when they discipline him, 19 his father and mother shall take hold of him and bring him to the elders at the gate of his town.20 They shall say to the elders, "This son of ours is stubborn and rebellious. He will not obey us. He is a profligate and a drunkard."
21 Then all the men of his town shall stone him to death. You must purge the evil from among you. All Israel will hear of it and be afraid.
This is not a child. It is one of an age that he can be "profligate and drunkard". He is at an age where he can be dangerous.
He also is totally worrisome to his parents. It is not just the father or the mother that has to bring him to the elders, but it is both of them. They must agree on this course of action. Their own child is so bad that these parents believe the greater danger is his remaining alive rather than dying. Their concern for themselves, their family, and the community is so great that they believe ending his life would be better than what they are experiencing and what they foresee.
That is an incredible indictment against a son by both a mother and a father.
Then, it is the men of the town who will take this offspring and execute the sentence of stoning. Stoning is used so that others would see and fear. It must be a horrendous death. With the men of the town intent upon the execution, one would expect it to be quick. They are to "take him" implies that he is immobilized. An immobilized man subjected to head strikes by large stones could quickly die. Perhaps as fast as with hanging. In any case it is visually brutal, and it is designed to cause fear in others.
Parents will fear and take greater care in the raising of their children. Children will fear when they see the result of rebellion, profligacy, and addiction.
It is that line "purge the evil from among you" that is fascinating. Granted that it could mean no more that "get rid of a bad egg." But, what if in the Wisdom of God there is acknowledgment of defects, genetic or otherwise, that would be terrible to continue in a population that had no defense against them, no medical care to mediate them.
What if it's an acknowledgment that a rabid dog, a mean-natured dog, or a broken dog simply is best served itself by being put down? And what if it's an acknowledgment that an infection in the community can be multiplied in that and ensuring generations if it is tolerated? And what if it matters little if it is behavioral or biological?
Is capital punishment, here, also an acceptance that capital punishment is itself practice of a certain level of eugenics, after due process of law has been brought to bear? It could only be behavioral. I see that. But, could it be both. An intentional controlling that which gets passed on to future generations to prevent a quicker fall into degeneracy?
I really believe he was experimented on
There was some story about him playing video games.
I wonder who her shrink is.
public institutions of education have been “experimenting” on students for a generation at least.
And after that, it will come down to anonymous calls to the police saying "I think he's crazy."
“And after that, it will come down to anonymous calls to the police saying “I think he’s crazy.” “
In the Soviet Union under Stalin, there was one case (and I’m sure many others), where a family had a really nice apartment, and the neighbor had a crappy. The neighbor told the secret police that she ‘heard’ the family saying bad things about Stalin.
...the neighbor then got the vacated apartment.
In stoning, everyone participates, no one know which stone killed.
In this case, the scripture required only the men of the city to participate. With that addition, I’d agree with your post.
Nully, She looks like her eyes are put in backwards (the part that should be near the bridge of the nose is on the outside, by the shape). Did someone photoshop that?
GO see the Chaplain. Often, the chaplain can help you sort stuff out, too.
That makes sense. Whenever someone is trying to cure a schizophrenic, one of the personalities is going to take that as a death threat.
Very good advice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.